RESUMO Este artigo pretende revisitar o tema do reconhecimento em Honneth a partir de duas perspectivas: num primeiro momento aborda as esferas do reconhecimento mediante a proposta de eticidade formal que contém os aspectos normativo-universais e os aspectos contextuais inerentes aos processos de autorrealização. Num segundo momento apresenta a crítica de Thompson a Honneth segundo a qual a teoria do reconhecimento é falha por dois motivos fundamentais: (i) ela é incapaz de lidar com as dinâmicas e efeitos do poder social, isto é, ela prescinde de uma análise ontológica do “poder constitutivo” e da “dominação constitutiva”; (ii) ela se centra nas práticas intersubjetivas de reconhecimento e esquece de enfocar as estruturas e sistemas normativos de integração funcional.
ABSTRACT This article aims to approach the Honneth’s theory of recognition from two perspectives: at first approaches the spheres of recognition from a formal ethical life purpose that maintain both universal and contextual aspects inherent to self-realization processes. Secondly, presents Thompson’s critique of Honneth according to which recognition’s theory fails for two main reasons: (i) it is unable to deal with the dynamics and effects of social power, that is, it dispenses with an ontological analysis of “constitutive power” and “constitutive domination”; (ii) it focuses on the intersubjective practices of recognition and forgets to focus on the normative structures and systems of functional integration.
See how this article has been cited at scite.ai
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.