7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Comparative differences in the atherosclerotic disease burden between the epicardial coronary arteries: quantitative plaque analysis on coronary computed tomography angiography

      1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 4 , 10 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 4 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 16 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 1 , 20 , 21 , 1 , for the PARADIGM Investigators
      European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          Anatomic series commonly report the extent and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD), regardless of location. The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in atherosclerotic plaque burden and composition across the major epicardial coronary arteries.

          Methods and results

          A total of 1271 patients (age 60 ± 9 years; 57% men) with suspected CAD prospectively underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Atherosclerotic plaque volume was quantified with categorization by composition (necrotic core, fibrofatty, fibrous, and calcified) based on Hounsfield Unit density. Per-vessel measures were compared using generalized estimating equation models. On CCTA, total plaque volume was lowest in the LCx (10.0 ± 29.4 mm3), followed by the RCA (32.8 ± 82.7 mm3; P < 0.001), and LAD (58.6 ± 83.3 mm3; P < 0.001), even when correcting for vessel length or volume. The prevalence of ≥2 high-risk plaque features, such as positive remodelling or spotty calcification, occurred less in the LCx (3.8%) when compared with the LAD (21.4%) or RCA (10.9%, P < 0.001). In the LCx, the most stenotic lesion was categorized as largely calcified more often than in the RCA and LAD (55.3% vs. 39.4% vs. 32.7%; P < 0.001). Median diameter stenosis was also lowest in the LCx (16.2%) and highest in the LAD (21.3%; P < 0.001) and located more distal along the LCx when compared with the RCA and LAD (P < 0.001).

          Conclusion

          Atherosclerotic plaque, irrespective of vessel volume, varied across the epicardial coronary arteries; with a significantly lower burden and different compositions in the LCx when compared with the LAD and RCA. These volumetric and compositional findings support a diverse milieu for atherosclerotic plaque development and may contribute to a varied acute coronary risk between the major epicardial coronary arteries.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis.

            Adel Malek (1999)
            Atherosclerosis, the leading cause of death in the developed world and nearly the leading cause in the developing world, is associated with systemic risk factors including hypertension, smoking, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus, among others. Nonetheless, atherosclerosis remains a geometrically focal disease, preferentially affecting the outer edges of vessel bifurcations. In these predisposed areas, hemodynamic shear stress, the frictional force acting on the endothelial cell surface as a result of blood flow, is weaker than in protected regions. Studies have identified hemodynamic shear stress as an important determinant of endothelial function and phenotype. Arterial-level shear stress (>15 dyne/cm2) induces endothelial quiescence and an atheroprotective gene expression profile, while low shear stress (<4 dyne/cm2), which is prevalent at atherosclerosis-prone sites, stimulates an atherogenic phenotype. The functional regulation of the endothelium by local hemodynamic shear stress provides a model for understanding the focal propensity of atherosclerosis in the setting of systemic factors and may help guide future therapeutic strategies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              SCCT guidelines for the performance and acquisition of coronary computed tomographic angiography: A report of the society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee: Endorsed by the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI).

              In response to recent technological advancements in acquisition techniques as well as a growing body of evidence regarding the optimal performance of coronary computed tomography angiography (coronary CTA), the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee has produced this update to its previously established 2009 "Guidelines for the Performance of Coronary CTA" (1). The purpose of this document is to provide standards meant to ensure reliable practice methods and quality outcomes based on the best available data in order to improve the diagnostic care of patients. Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines for the Interpretation is published separately (2). The Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee ensures compliance with all existing standards for the declaration of conflict of interest by all authors and reviewers for the purpose ofclarity and transparency.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                2047-2404
                2047-2412
                March 01 2021
                February 22 2021
                November 20 2020
                March 01 2021
                February 22 2021
                November 20 2020
                : 22
                : 3
                : 322-330
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Radiology, Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
                [2 ]Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and the Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
                [4 ]Department of Medicine, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
                [5 ]Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
                [6 ]Department of Medicine, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, CA, USA
                [7 ]Department of Radiology, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, SDN IRCCS, Naples, Italy
                [8 ]Department of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
                [9 ]Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan University Hospital, Busan, South Korea
                [10 ]Department of Radiology,UNICA, Unit of Cardiovascular Imaging, Hospital da Luz, Nova Medical School, Lisboa, Portugal
                [11 ]Department of Cardiology, NOVA Medical School, Lisboa, Portugal
                [12 ]Department of Radiology, Casa de Saude São Jose, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
                [13 ]Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, German Heart Center, Munich, Germany
                [14 ]Department of Medicine and Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
                [15 ]Department of Radiology, Area Vasta 1/ASUR Marche, Urbino, Italy
                [16 ]Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Woman’s University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
                [17 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
                [18 ]Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
                [19 ]Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, South Korea
                [20 ]Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea
                [21 ]Yonsei-Cedars-Sinai Integrative Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea
                [22 ]Department of Pathology, CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
                [23 ]Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
                [24 ]Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
                [25 ]Department of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
                [26 ]Cleerly, Inc., New York, NY, USA
                [27 ]Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Heart, Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, and Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Cardiovascular Health, New York, NY, USA
                Article
                10.1093/ehjci/jeaa275
                1039607e-3d34-48bd-9466-0d2799f30e85
                © 2020

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article