0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Letter to the Editor Regarding “Clinical Application of Different Doses of Hydromorphone Slow-Release Analgesia in Lumbar Fusion in Elderly Patients”

      letter
      ,
      Pain and Therapy
      Springer Healthcare

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring acute postoperative pain using the visual analog scale: the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in spine surgery

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Comparison of the Efficacy of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block With Epidural Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Relief After Unilateral Total Knee Replacement

              Introduction With recent developments in postoperative pain management after total knee replacement (TKR), the continuous femoral nerve block is becoming a common practice. The purpose of this study was to compare a femoral nerve block with time-tested epidural analgesia in a tertiary care setup in a developing country. Methodology A randomized control trial took place at Shifa International Hospital (SIH), Islamabad, Pakistan. Sixty patients, aged 40 to 90 years old, 12 males and 48 females, who were undergoing unilateral TKR for osteoarthritis in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classes I and II, weighing between 50 and 99 kg, and fully able to understand and respond to the numeric rating scale (NRS) were included in the study. While patients belonging to ASA physical status class ≥3, with chronic opiate therapy, having allergies to local anesthetics or equipment material, or with neuromuscular disease, were excluded from the study. Ethical approval was obtained, and patients were divided into two groups, with group A given epidural and group B given a femoral nerve block for pain management postop. Data were collected. The pain was recorded using the NRS at six, 12, and 24 hours postop. Results The results for six hours and 12 hours were found to be significant. Patients in group A had a lower NRS rating postop as compared to group B and required a lesser amount of additional boluses for pain management.  Conclusion The femoral nerve block is inferior to epidural analgesia for pain management after unilateral TKR in the first 24 hours, with a greater need for extra boluses to relieve pain.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jimmynetchu@163.com
                Journal
                Pain Ther
                Pain Ther
                Pain and Therapy
                Springer Healthcare (Cheshire )
                2193-8237
                2193-651X
                10 October 2024
                10 October 2024
                December 2024
                : 13
                : 6
                : 1715-1716
                Affiliations
                Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, ( https://ror.org/041r75465) Tongbai North Road 16, Zhongyuan District, Zhengzhou, Henan China
                Article
                664
                10.1007/s40122-024-00664-9
                11543970
                39388071
                103897d9-6f7e-4b46-a52a-8759d8b8edf7
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 18 July 2024
                : 18 September 2024
                Categories
                Letter
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Healthcare Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024

                Comments

                Comment on this article