6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Use of Panel of Markers in Serous Effusion to Distinguish Reactive Mesothelial Cells from Adenocarcinoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction:

          Although cytological examination helps in diagnosis of malignancy in serous effusion, at times it is difficult to differentiate atypical reactive mesothelial cells from adenocarcinoma (AC) cells. To resolve this problem, various ancillary methods have been used. Immunocytochemistry (ICC) is one such commonly used technique in which various panel of antibodies has been tried. Unfortunately, so far no unique marker is available to solve this issue. Hence, the present study evaluates the efficacy of four antibody panel comprising of MOC-31, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), calretinin (CAL), and mesothelin (MES) to solve this problem.

          Materials and Methods:

          Forty-two cases suspected of malignant effusion in pleural/peritoneal fluid and 42 cases of reactive effusion were included. Cytospin smears were prepared and stained with Giemsa stain for cytomorphological diagnosis. Cytospin smears and cell blocks were made forICC. ICC for MOC-31, EMA, CAL, and MES was performed.

          Results:

          Among the suspected malignant effusion cases, 30 cases were AC and 12 cases were suspicious for malignancy by cytomorphology. MOC31 demonstrated 100% sensitivity (Sn) and 95.24% specificity (Sp), and EMA had 88.1% Sn and 92.86% Sp for AC cases. CAL demonstrated 100% and 97.62%, and MES 97.62% and 88.1% Sn and Sp in reactive mesothelial cells, respectively.

          Conclusion:

          In conclusion, combination of MOC-31 and CAL as a limited panel will be helpful in giving an appropriate diagnosis in difficult cases and thereby, help in patient management. In addition, ICC on cytospin smears gave results similar to cell blocks, and if standardised cytospin is simple technique to perform, unlike cell blocks.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Value of mesothelin immunostaining in the diagnosis of mesothelioma.

          Mesothelin is a cell surface antigen of unknown function that is strongly expressed in mesothelial cells. Although it was reported in 1992 that immunostaining with the K1 anti-mesothelin antibody could be very useful in distinguishing between epithelioid mesotheliomas and pulmonary adenocarcinomas, no further studies have been published on the value of this marker in the diagnosis of mesotheliomas. To determine whether mesothelin can assist in discriminating epithelioid mesotheliomas from lung adenocarcinomas or from other carcinomas metastatic to the serosal membranes, 55 mesotheliomas (44 epithelioid, 3 biphasic, and 8 sarcomatoid), 48 carcinomas of the lung (31 adenocarcinomas, 17 squamous carcinomas), and 86 nonpulmonary adenocarcinomas (14 ovary, 5 peritoneum, 9 endometrium, 11 pancreas, 4 stomach, 16 colon, 12 breast, 9 kidney, 4 thyroid, and 2 prostate) were investigated for mesothelin expression using the recently available 5B2 anti-mesothelin monoclonal antibody. Reactivity was obtained in all 44 (100%) of the epithelioid mesotheliomas, 12 (39%) of the lung adenocarcinomas, and 42 (49%) of the nonpulmonary adenocarcinomas (14 [100%] ovary; 5 [100%] peritoneum; 6 [67%] endometrium; 10 [91%] pancreas; 2 [50%] stomach; 5 [31%] colon; and in none [0] of the breast, kidney, thyroid, or prostate). Three (18%) of the squamous carcinomas of the lung, but none of the sarcomatoid mesotheliomas, exhibited positivity for this marker, nor was any reactivity seen in the spindle cell component of the biphasic mesotheliomas. It is concluded that despite the low specificity of mesothelin for discriminating between epithelioid mesotheliomas and adenocarcinomas, immunostaining for this marker may have some utility in those instances in which the results obtained with the standard panel of immunohistochemical markers used for the diagnosis of mesotheliomas are equivocal. Because mesothelin is a highly sensitive positive marker for epithelioid mesotheliomas, a negative staining for this marker is an indication against such a diagnosis; however, because of its limited utility, it is not recommended for inclusion in the standard panel of immunohistochemical markers used in the distinction between mesotheliomas and adenocarcinomas.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cell block cytology. Improved preparation and its efficacy in diagnostic cytology.

            Cell blocks prepared from residual tissue fluids and fine-needle aspirations can be useful adjuncts to smears for establishing a more definitive cytopathologic diagnosis. They can be particularly useful for categorization of tumors that otherwise may not be possible from smears themselves. A modified cell block technique using an improvised ethanol formalin fixative (Nathan alcohol formalin substitute) followed by a simple paraffin processing schedule is described. This improved preparation offers excellent cytomorphologic features corresponding closely to cells in Papanicolaou-stained smears and ensures optimal preservation of histochemical and immunocytochemical properties. The technique is simple and reproducible and uses routine safe laboratory chemicals. The efficacy of cell blocks also is discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Diagnostic accuracy of effusion cytology.

              The aim of this investigation was to report on the diagnostic accuracy of conventional effusion cytology. Cytological diagnoses of 300 pleural effusions and 300 ascites were compared with clinical and/or histological follow-ups of the respective patients. Sensitivity of our cytological diagnoses on pleural effusions was 50.0%, specificity 97.0%, positive predictive value 95.7%, and negative predictive value 86.4%. Sensitivity in ascitic effusions was 62.4%, specificity 98.0%, positive predictive value 100.0%, and negative predictive value 88.3%; 5.8% of diagnoses for pleural and 4.4% for peritoneal effusions were suspicious or doubtful. The overall false-positive rate was 0.5%, while the false-negative rate was 31.5%. False-negative results were due to sampling errors in 71% of pleural and 73% of peritoneal effusions and to screening errors in 29% and 27%, respectively. Our data and those from the literature show that diagnostic accuracy of effusion cytology is still unsatisfactory and should be improved. Therefore, the use of different adjuvant methods is recommended.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Cytol
                J Cytol
                JCytol
                Journal of Cytology
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                0970-9371
                0974-5165
                Jan-Mar 2019
                : 36
                : 1
                : 28-31
                Affiliations
                [1]Pathology Department, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Kelambakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
                [1 ]Pathology Department, Maulana Azad Medical College and Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Dr. Devi Subbarayan, Pathology Department, D Block, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Kelambakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu - 603 103, India. E-mail: sdevi2001@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                JCytol-36-28
                10.4103/JOC.JOC_13_18
                6343394
                0ff6c545-c01e-4a7a-a429-31a74d80524f
                Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Cytology

                This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                Categories
                Original Article

                Pathology
                adenocarcinoma,calretinin,cell block,immunocytochemistry,moc-31,reactive mesothelial cells
                Pathology
                adenocarcinoma, calretinin, cell block, immunocytochemistry, moc-31, reactive mesothelial cells

                Comments

                Comment on this article