1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Aseptic humeral shaft nonunion

      , ,
      Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aseptic humeral shaft nonunions are rare lesions, with less than 700 cases per year in France. This low frequency explains why they are difficult to manage. They can be hypertrophic or atrophic, with or without a defect. The diagnosis is made based on radiographs and/or CT scan images. Nonunion is suspected early on when a patient presents with abnormal motion at the fracture site 6 weeks after the initial injury event in the context of conservative treatment or has large residual displacement after initial treatment or an open fracture. The treatment for hypertrophic nonunion consists in applying stable, rigid fixation, most often using a large-fragment plate with 4.5 mm screws, combined with cancellous autograft. When combined with the osteoperiosteal decortication first described by Judet, it produces union in 98% of cases. Intramedullary (IM) nail fixation with an autograft is another possibility. In atrophic nonunions, resecting the ends and ensuring the soft tissues have good vitality will generally lead to fracture union. Nonunions with critical size defects (larger than 5 cm), which have a high risk of infection, are a treatment challenge that requires stable fixation and recourse to more complex treatments like the two-step induced membrane technique or vascularized fibular graft. In all cases, to avoid complex repeat revision, internal fixation with plate or IM nail must be combined with a bone graft in situ to maximize the chances of union.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Classification of non-union: need for a new scoring system?

          A new scoring system is proposed in order to assist surgeons with the complex analysis associated with non-union surgery. Patients with non-union are rarely easily compared with one another and this has frustrated research in this field. We have therefore attributed values to clinical features based on clinical experience and research evidence, so that patients of similar complexity can be compared with one another. When greater experience with this scoring system has been gained it will be further refined and validated. We propose that surgeons with a sub specialist interest in non-union surgery use this system in reporting results, and that non- specialist surgeons use it to inform their decision to treat the fracture themselves, or refer to a sub specialist.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Exchange nailing of ununited fractures.

            Exchange nailing is most appropriate for a nonunion without substantial bone loss. There is no clear consensus regarding the use of exchange nailing in the presence of active, purulent infection. The exchange nail should be at least 1 mm larger in diameter than the nail being removed, and it has been recommended that it be up to 4 mm larger when the nail being removed was greatly undersized. Canal reaming should progress until osseous tissue is observed in the reaming flutes. Exchange nailing is an excellent choice for aseptic nonunions of noncomminuted diaphyseal femoral fractures, with union rates reported to range from 72% to 100%. On the basis of the available literature, exchange nailing cannot be recommended for distal femoral nonunions at this time. Exchange nailing is an excellent choice for aseptic nonunions of noncomminuted diaphyseal tibial fractures, with union rates reported to range from 76% to 96%. On the basis of the available literature, exchange nailing is generally not indicated for humeral nonunions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Nonunions of the humerus.

              Humerus fractures comprise 5% to 8% of all fractures. Nonunions are uncommon, but when they occur, they present a challenge to the orthopaedic surgeon and often are debilitating to patients. There are risk factors that may predispose patients to nonunion. Many methods of treating these nonunions have been described with varying degrees of success. We review the literature concerning the treatment of proximal, midshaft, and distal humeral nonunions and describe our treatment protocol based on the literature.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research
                Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research
                Elsevier BV
                18770568
                February 2023
                February 2023
                : 109
                : 1
                : 103462
                Article
                10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103462
                36942794
                0f5ad073-7088-4d24-8144-1da4442fa93f
                © 2023

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-017

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-037

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-012

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-029

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-004

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article