18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Patient factors and their impact on neutropenic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Neutropenia is associated with an increased risk of mortality and hospitalisation. Strategies, including the prescribing of colony-stimulating growth factors (CSFs), are adopted when a high risk (> 20%) of neutropenic complications are seen in the clinical trial setting. With a diverse treatment population that may differ from the patient groups recruited to studies, appropriate prescribing decisions by clinicians are essential. At present, results are conflicting from studies evaluating the risks of certain patient attributes on neutropenic events; we aimed to aggregate these associations to guide future management.

          Design

          A systematic review with a meta-analysis was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Studies were identified through a literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases from inception to December 1, 2017. Studies were included into a meta-analysis if they adjusted for confounders; analyses were conducted in STATA v 15.1 SE.

          Results

          A total of 4415 articles were retrieved by the search with 37 meeting the inclusion criteria and 12 eligible for meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted for increasing age and yielded a pooled odds ratio of 1.39 (1.11, 1.76, I 2 = 24.1%), in our subgroup analysis of 4814 patients. Odds ratios for studies were pooled that reported associations for one co-morbidity compared to none and resulted in an overall odds of 1.54 (CI 1.09–2.09, I 2 = 13.1%), including 9189 patients in total.

          Conclusions

          Results can enhance current guidance in prescribing primary prophylaxis for treatments that either fall marginally under the internationally recognised 20% neutropenia risk.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-019-04773-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration

          Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarise evidence relating to efficacy and safety of healthcare interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, are not optimal. Poor reporting of systematic reviews diminishes their value to clinicians, policy makers, and other users. Since the development of the QUOROM (quality of reporting of meta-analysis) statement—a reporting guideline published in 1999—there have been several conceptual, methodological, and practical advances regarding the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Also, reviews of published systematic reviews have found that key information about these studies is often poorly reported. Realising these issues, an international group that included experienced authors and methodologists developed PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) as an evolution of the original QUOROM guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of evaluations of health care interventions. The PRISMA statement consists of a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram. The checklist includes items deemed essential for transparent reporting of a systematic review. In this explanation and elaboration document, we explain the meaning and rationale for each checklist item. For each item, we include an example of good reporting and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature. The PRISMA statement, this document, and the associated website (www.prisma-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Management of febrile neutropaenia: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Recommendations for the Use of WBC Growth Factors: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update.

              To update the 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline on the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors (CSFs).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +447715252045 , p.chambers@ucl.ac.uk
                y.jani@ucl.ac.uk
                l.wei@ucl.ac.uk
                e.kipps@nhs.net
                martin.forster1@nhs.net
                i.wong@ucl.ac.uk
                Journal
                Support Care Cancer
                Support Care Cancer
                Supportive Care in Cancer
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0941-4355
                1433-7339
                16 April 2019
                16 April 2019
                2019
                : 27
                : 7
                : 2413-2424
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8937 2257, GRID grid.52996.31, UCLH-UCL Centre for Medicines Optimisation Research and Education, Pharmacy Department, , University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, ; 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU UK
                [2 ]ISNI 0000000121901201, GRID grid.83440.3b, UCLH-UCL Centre for Medicines Optimisation Research and Education, , UCL School of Pharmacy, ; 29-39, Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX UK
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0417 0461, GRID grid.424926.f, The Royal Marsden Hospital, ; Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ UK
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8937 2257, GRID grid.52996.31, UCL Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, , University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, ; 72 Huntley Street, London, WC1 6DD UK
                [5 ]ISNI 0000000121742757, GRID grid.194645.b, Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, , University of Hong Kong, ; Hong Kong, China
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6669-9411
                Article
                4773
                10.1007/s00520-019-04773-6
                6541585
                30993453
                0eb105ff-b5d7-4ecc-b258-5afe7bc930c4
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 13 December 2018
                : 22 March 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: National Insitute for Health Research
                Award ID: DRF 2017-10-016
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                neutropenia,cancer,chemotherapy,neutropenic sepsis,risk
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                neutropenia, cancer, chemotherapy, neutropenic sepsis, risk

                Comments

                Comment on this article