14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cardiovascular Safety During Treatment With Baricitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To assess the frequency of cardiovascular and venous thromboembolic events in clinical studies of baricitinib, an oral, selective JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor approved in more than 50 countries for the treatment of moderately‐to‐severely active rheumatoid arthritis ( RA).

          Methods

          Data were pooled from 9 RA studies. Placebo comparison up to 24 weeks included data from 6 studies. Randomized dose comparison between baricitinib doses of 2 mg and 4 mg used data from 4 studies and from the associated long‐term extension study. The data analysis set designated “All‐bari‐ RA” included all baricitinib exposures at any dose.

          Results

          Overall, 3,492 RA patients received baricitinib (7,860 patient‐years of exposure). No imbalance compared to the placebo group was seen in the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (incidence rates [IRs] of 0.5 per 100 patient‐years for placebo and 0.8 per 100 patient‐years for 4 mg baricitinib), arterial thrombotic events (ATE) (IRs of 0.5 per 100 patient‐years for placebo and 0.5 per 100 patient‐years for 4 mg baricitinib), or congestive heart failure (CHF) broad term (IRs of 4.3 per 100 patient‐years for placebo and 2.4 per 100 patient‐years for 4 mg baricitinib). Deep vein thrombosis ( DVT)/pulmonary embolism ( PE) were reported in 0 of 1,070 patients treated with placebo and 6 of 997 patients treated with 4 mg baricitinib during the placebo‐controlled period; these events were serious in 2 of 6 patients, while all 6 had risk factors and 1 patient developed DVT/ PE after discontinuation of the study drug. In the 2 mg–4 mg‐extended data analysis set, IRs of DVT/ PE were comparable between the doses across event types ( IRs of 0.5 per 100 patient‐years in those receiving 2 mg baricitinib and 0.6 per 100 patient‐years in those receiving 4 mg baricitinib). In the All‐bari‐ RA data analysis set, the rates were stable over time, with an IR of DVT/ PE of 0.5 per 100 patient‐years.

          Conclusion

          In RA clinical trials, no association was found between baricitinib treatment and the incidence of MACE, ATE, or CHF. With regard to incidence of DVT/ PE, 6 events occurred in patients treated with 4 mg baricitinib, but no cases of DVT/ PE were reported in the placebo group. During longer‐term evaluation, the incidence of DVT/ PE was similar between the baricitinib dose groups, with consistent IR values over time, and this was similar to the rates previously reported in patients with RA.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism

          Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is categorized by the U.S. Surgeon General as a major public health problem. VTE is relatively common and associated with reduced survival and substantial health-care costs, and recurs frequently. VTE is a complex (multifactorial) disease, involving interactions between acquired or inherited predispositions to thrombosis and VTE risk factors, including increasing patient age and obesity, hospitalization for surgery or acute illness, nursing-home confinement, active cancer, trauma or fracture, immobility or leg paresis, superficial vein thrombosis, and, in women, pregnancy and puerperium, oral contraception, and hormone therapy. Although independent VTE risk factors and predictors of VTE recurrence have been identified, and effective primary and secondary prophylaxis is available, the occurrence of VTE seems to be relatively constant, or even increasing.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI): a review of their usefulness and validity in rheumatoid arthritis.

            Composite indices or pooled indices are useful tools for the evaluation of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). They allow the integration of various aspects of the disease into a single numerical value, and may therefore facilitate consistent patient care and improve patient compliance, which both can lead to improved outcomes. The Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) are two new tools for the evaluation of disease activity in RA. They have been developed to provide physicians and patients with simple and more comprehensible instruments. Moreover, the CDAI is the only composite index that does not incorporate an acute phase response and can therefore be used to conduct a disease activity evaluation essentially anytime and anywhere. These two new tools have not been developed to replace currently available instruments such as the DAS28, but rather to provide options for different environments. The comparative construct, content, and discriminant validity of all three indices--the DAS28, the SDAI, and the CDAI--allow physicians to base their choice of instrument on their infrastructure and their needs, and all of them can also be used in clinical trials.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Carotid ultrasound is useful for the cardiovascular risk stratification of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results of a population-based study.

              To determine if the use of carotid ultrasonography (US) may improve the stratification of the cardiovascular (CV) risk in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A set of 370 consecutive patients without history of CV events were studied to assess carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and plaques. As previously proposed, CV risk was calculated according to the modified EULAR systematic coronary risk evaluation (mSCORE) for RA that was adapted by the application of a multiplier factor of 1.5 in those patients fulfilling ≥ 2 of 3 specific criteria. The mean disease duration was 9.8 years, 250 (68%) had rheumatoid factor/anticyclic citrullinated peptide positivity and 61 (17%) extra-articular manifestations. 43 were excluded because they had type 2 diabetes mellitus or severe chronic kidney disease. CV risk was categorised in the remaining 327 RA patients according to the mSCORE: mild (96 cases; 29.3%), moderate (201; 61.5%) and high/very high risk (30; 9.2%). Only five patients were reclassified as having high/very high CV risk when the mSCORE was applied. Severe carotid US abnormalities (cIMT >0.90 mm and/or plaques) were uncommon in patients with low mSCORE (13%). Nevertheless, in patients with moderate mSCORE, severe carotid US abnormalities were observed in 63% of cases. A model that included a chart mSCORE risk ≥ 5% plus the presence of severe carotid US findings in patients with moderate mSCORE risk (≥ 1% and <5%) yielded high sensitivity for high/very high CV risk (93 (95% CI 88 to 96)). Our results support the use of carotid US in the assessment of CV risk in patients with RA.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                peter.taylor@kennedy.ox.ac.uk
                Journal
                Arthritis Rheumatol
                10.1002/(ISSN)2326-5205
                ART
                Arthritis & Rheumatology (Hoboken, N.j.)
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2326-5191
                2326-5205
                25 May 2019
                July 2019
                : 71
                : 7 ( doiID: 10.1002/art.2019.71.issue-7 )
                : 1042-1055
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] University of Oxford Oxford UK
                [ 2 ] Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston Massachusetts
                [ 3 ] Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
                [ 4 ] Eli Lilly and Company Indianapolis Indiana
                [ 5 ] Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla IDIVAL and University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain and University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa
                [ 6 ] Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Address correspondence to Peter C. Taylor, MA, PhD, FRCP, FRCPE, Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK. E‐mail: peter.taylor@ 123456kennedy.ox.ac.uk .
                Article
                ART40841
                10.1002/art.40841
                6618316
                30663869
                0ea71178-926a-43ba-b50a-245203df6679
                © 2019 Eli Lilly and Company. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 19 July 2018
                : 15 January 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 3, Pages: 14, Words: 9900
                Funding
                Funded by: Eli Lilly and Company
                Funded by: Incyte Corporation
                Categories
                Original Article
                Rheumatoid Arthritis
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                art40841
                July 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.6.5 mode:remove_FC converted:10.07.2019

                Comments

                Comment on this article