1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      TROPION-Breast03: a randomized phase III global trial of datopotamab deruxtecan ± durvalumab in patients with triple-negative breast cancer and residual invasive disease at surgical resection after neoadjuvant therapy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Despite advances in the treatment of early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), patients with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant therapy have a high risk of disease recurrence and worse survival outcomes than those who have pathological complete response (pCR). Improving outcomes in early TNBC remains an unmet need requiring new adjuvant treatment approaches. Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) is an antibody–drug conjugate comprising a humanized anti-trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody attached via a plasma-stable, cleavable linker to a potent topoisomerase I inhibitor payload, with activity observed in advanced TNBC.

          Objectives:

          TROPION-Breast03 is an ongoing phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of Dato-DXd alone or combined with durvalumab versus standard-of-care therapy as adjuvant treatment in patients with stage I–III TNBC with residual invasive disease at surgical resection following neoadjuvant treatment.

          Methods and design:

          Eligible patients, aged ⩾18 years, will be randomized in a 2:1:2 ratio to receive Dato-DXd [6 mg/kg intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks (Q3W); eight cycles] and durvalumab (1120 mg IV Q3W; nine cycles), Dato-DXd monotherapy (6 mg/kg IV Q3W), or investigator’s choice of therapy (ICT; capecitabine, pembrolizumab, or capecitabine and pembrolizumab). The primary endpoint is invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) for Dato-DXd and durvalumab versus ICT. Key secondary endpoints include safety, distant disease-free survival, and overall survival for Dato-DXd and durvalumab versus ICT and iDFS for Dato-DXd monotherapy versus ICT.

          Ethics:

          TROPION-Breast03 will be approved by the independent ethics committees or institutional review boards at each study site. All study participants will provide written informed consent.

          Discussion:

          TROPION-Breast03 will help define the potential role of Dato-DXd in the treatment of patients with early-stage TNBC who do not have pCR after neoadjuvant therapy.

          Trial registration:

          ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05629585 (registration date: 29 November 2022).

          Plain language summary

          TROPION-Breast03: a clinical trial designed to assess the effectiveness and safety of Dato-DXd, alone or in combination with durvalumab, in patients with triple-negative breast cancer who have cancer cells remaining at the time of surgery after initial systemic therapy

          Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), in which cells do not have estrogen or progesterone receptors or high levels of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, is the most aggressive breast cancer subtype. TNBC is difficult to treat and associated with high risk of recurrence despite standard systemic therapy (treatment targeting the entire body), which can include chemotherapy alone or in combination with immunotherapy (treatment targeting the immune system). To reduce the risk of recurrence, standard systemic treatment is often followed by surgical removal of the patient’s tumors and additional systemic treatment. Dato-DXd is an antibody-drug conjugate, which is an anticancer drug (DXd) connected to an antibody (datopotamab) by a stable linker. Datopotamab binds to TROP2, a protein found on breast cancer cells, and is taken into the tumor cell where the linker breaks, releasing DXd to kill the cell. By delivering DXd directly to cancer cells, Dato-DXd reduces exposure in the rest of the body, reducing the risk of side effects. Since Dato-DXd can recruit immune cells to cancer sites, it may work better combined with durvalumab, a drug that blocks the activity of a protein called PD-L1, making cancer cells more susceptible to being killed by immune cells. The TROPION-Breast03 study will compare Dato-DXd, alone or combined with durvalumab, with standard-of-care therapy in patients with TNBC that has not spread to parts of the body away from the original tumor site(s), but with cancer cells remaining at the time of surgery after initial systemic therapy. It will assess how well each treatment works and describe any side effects. We plan to recruit 1,075 eligible adults who will be randomly assigned in a 2:1:2 ratio to: • Dato-DXd + durvalumab • Dato-DXd alone • Standard-of-care therapy • Patients will receive treatment until they complete the planned course of therapy (8 or 9 cycles), their cancer returns, side effects become unacceptable, or they choose to stop.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries

          This article provides an update on the global cancer burden using the GLOBOCAN 2020 estimates of cancer incidence and mortality produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Worldwide, an estimated 19.3 million new cancer cases (18.1 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) and almost 10.0 million cancer deaths (9.9 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) occurred in 2020. Female breast cancer has surpassed lung cancer as the most commonly diagnosed cancer, with an estimated 2.3 million new cases (11.7%), followed by lung (11.4%), colorectal (10.0 %), prostate (7.3%), and stomach (5.6%) cancers. Lung cancer remained the leading cause of cancer death, with an estimated 1.8 million deaths (18%), followed by colorectal (9.4%), liver (8.3%), stomach (7.7%), and female breast (6.9%) cancers. Overall incidence was from 2-fold to 3-fold higher in transitioned versus transitioning countries for both sexes, whereas mortality varied <2-fold for men and little for women. Death rates for female breast and cervical cancers, however, were considerably higher in transitioning versus transitioned countries (15.0 vs 12.8 per 100,000 and 12.4 vs 5.2 per 100,000, respectively). The global cancer burden is expected to be 28.4 million cases in 2040, a 47% rise from 2020, with a larger increase in transitioning (64% to 95%) versus transitioned (32% to 56%) countries due to demographic changes, although this may be further exacerbated by increasing risk factors associated with globalization and a growing economy. Efforts to build a sustainable infrastructure for the dissemination of cancer prevention measures and provision of cancer care in transitioning countries is critical for global cancer control.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis.

            Pathological complete response has been proposed as a surrogate endpoint for prediction of long-term clinical benefit, such as disease-free survival, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). We had four key objectives: to establish the association between pathological complete response and EFS and OS, to establish the definition of pathological complete response that correlates best with long-term outcome, to identify the breast cancer subtypes in which pathological complete response is best correlated with long-term outcome, and to assess whether an increase in frequency of pathological complete response between treatment groups predicts improved EFS and OS. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Medline for clinical trials of neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. To be eligible, studies had to meet three inclusion criteria: include at least 200 patients with primary breast cancer treated with preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery; have available data for pathological complete response, EFS, and OS; and have a median follow-up of at least 3 years. We compared the three most commonly used definitions of pathological complete response--ypT0 ypN0, ypT0/is ypN0, and ypT0/is--for their association with EFS and OS in a responder analysis. We assessed the association between pathological complete response and EFS and OS in various subgroups. Finally, we did a trial-level analysis to assess whether pathological complete response could be used as a surrogate endpoint for EFS or OS. We obtained data from 12 identified international trials and 11 955 patients were included in our responder analysis. Eradication of tumour from both breast and lymph nodes (ypT0 ypN0 or ypT0/is ypN0) was better associated with improved EFS (ypT0 ypN0: hazard ratio [HR] 0·44, 95% CI 0·39-0·51; ypT0/is ypN0: 0·48, 0·43-0·54) and OS (0·36, 0·30-0·44; 0·36, 0·31-0·42) than was tumour eradication from the breast alone (ypT0/is; EFS: HR 0·60, 95% CI 0·55-0·66; OS 0·51, 0·45-0·58). We used the ypT0/is ypN0 definition for all subsequent analyses. The association between pathological complete response and long-term outcomes was strongest in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (EFS: HR 0·24, 95% CI 0·18-0·33; OS: 0·16, 0·11-0·25) and in those with HER2-positive, hormone-receptor-negative tumours who received trastuzumab (EFS: 0·15, 0·09-0·27; OS: 0·08, 0·03, 0·22). In the trial-level analysis, we recorded little association between increases in frequency of pathological complete response and EFS (R(2)=0·03, 95% CI 0·00-0·25) and OS (R(2)=0·24, 0·00-0·70). Patients who attain pathological complete response defined as ypT0 ypN0 or ypT0/is ypN0 have improved survival. The prognostic value is greatest in aggressive tumour subtypes. Our pooled analysis could not validate pathological complete response as a surrogate endpoint for improved EFS and OS. US Food and Drug Administration. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.

              In 1986, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) initiated a research program to develop an integrated, modular approach for evaluating the quality of life of patients participating in international clinical trials. We report here the results of an international field study of the practicality, reliability, and validity of the EORTC QLQ-C30, the current core questionnaire. The QLQ-C30 incorporates nine multi-item scales: five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting); and a global health and quality-of-life scale. Several single-item symptom measures are also included. The questionnaire was administered before treatment and once during treatment to 305 patients with nonresectable lung cancer from centers in 13 countries. Clinical variables assessed included disease stage, weight loss, performance status, and treatment toxicity. The average time required to complete the questionnaire was approximately 11 minutes, and most patients required no assistance. The data supported the hypothesized scale structure of the questionnaire with the exception of role functioning (work and household activities), which was also the only multi-item scale that failed to meet the minimal standards for reliability (Cronbach's alpha coefficient > or = .70) either before or during treatment. Validity was shown by three findings. First, while all interscale correlations were statistically significant, the correlation was moderate, indicating that the scales were assessing distinct components of the quality-of-life construct. Second, most of the functional and symptom measures discriminated clearly between patients differing in clinical status as defined by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scale, weight loss, and treatment toxicity. Third, there were statistically significant changes, in the expected direction, in physical and role functioning, global quality of life, fatigue, and nausea and vomiting, for patients whose performance status had improved or worsened during treatment. The reliability and validity of the questionnaire were highly consistent across the three language-cultural groups studied: patients from English-speaking countries, Northern Europe, and Southern Europe. These results support the EORTC QLQ-C30 as a reliable and valid measure of the quality of life of cancer patients in multicultural clinical research settings. Work is ongoing to examine the performance of the questionnaire among more heterogenous patient samples and in phase II and phase III clinical trials.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Journal
                Ther Adv Med Oncol
                Ther Adv Med Oncol
                TAM
                sptam
                Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                1758-8340
                1758-8359
                29 April 2024
                2024
                : 16
                : 17588359241248336
                Affiliations
                [1-17588359241248336]Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
                [2-17588359241248336]Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
                [3-17588359241248336]Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Maywood, IL, USA
                [4-17588359241248336]Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain and HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
                [5-17588359241248336]Seoul National University College of Medicine, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                [6-17588359241248336]Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center at Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
                [7-17588359241248336]Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
                [8-17588359241248336]Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
                [9-17588359241248336]Institut Curie, Paris, France
                [10-17588359241248336]Instituto D’Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil
                [11-17588359241248336]National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
                [12-17588359241248336]Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
                [13-17588359241248336]AstraZeneca, Waltham, MA, USA
                [14-17588359241248336]Cancer Research and Biostatistics, Seattle, WA, USA
                [15-17588359241248336]Biostatistics, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
                [16-17588359241248336]Late Development – Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
                [17-17588359241248336]Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC) Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
                [18-17588359241248336]The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4885-1157
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9744-7372
                Article
                10.1177_17588359241248336
                10.1177/17588359241248336
                11057345
                38686016
                0e7d1454-bc7d-44cd-a5c9-9e3d96396851
                © The Author(s), 2024

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 5 January 2024
                : 3 April 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: AstraZeneca, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100004325;
                Award ID: NCT05629585
                Funded by: Daiichi-Sankyo, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100002973;
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                January-December 2024
                ts1

                adjuvant therapy,antibody–drug conjugates,immunotherapy,programmed cell death ligand-1,triple-negative breast cancer,trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2

                Comments

                Comment on this article