1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      TQB2450 in patients with advanced malignant tumors: results from a phase I dose-escalation and expansion study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has demonstrated impressive clinical benefits in multiple tumor types. TQB2450, a novel monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death ligand 1, has shown safety and efficacy in preclinical studies.

          Objectives:

          This first-in-human study aimed to evaluate the safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity, and preliminary antitumor activity of TQB2450 in patients with advanced malignant tumors.

          Design and methods:

          In this phase I study, eligible patients with advanced malignant tumors received intravenous TQB2450 once every 3 weeks. This study consisted of a 3 + 3 dose-escalation phase (1–30 mg/kg) and a specific dose-expansion phase (1200 mg). The primary endpoints were maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and safety. The secondary endpoints were PK, immunogenicity, and investigator-assessed response rate.

          Results:

          Between April 2018 and February 2020, 40 patients were enrolled (22 in the dose-escalation phase and 18 in the dose-expansion phase). No DLT was reported and the MTD was not reached. Grade ⩾3 or worse treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 11 (27.50%) patients, with the most frequent being aspartate aminotransferase increased (5.00%), leukopenia (5.00%), and anemia (5.00%). Treatment-related serious AEs were reported in six patients, the most common of which was decompensated liver function (5.00%). No treatment-related death was reported. The maximum serum concentration of TQB2450 increased in a dose-proportional manner. Treatment-induced anti-drug antibodies were detected in 31.58% (12/38) of patients. The investigator assessed the objective response rate as 5.00% and the disease control rate was 52.50%, including 2 partial responses and 19 stable diseases. The median progression-free survival was 2.69 (95% confidence interval, 2.07–6.14) months.

          Conclusion:

          TQB2450 has a manageable safety profile with favorable PK and immunogenicity and has shown early evidence of clinical activity in advanced malignant tumors.

          ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:

          NCT03460457.

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

          Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September, 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles.18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies.A detailed explanation and elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the websites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Fundamental Mechanisms of Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy

            Immune checkpoint blockade is able to induce durable responses across multiple types of cancer, which has enabled the oncology community to begin to envision potentially curative therapeutic approaches. However, the remarkable responses to immunotherapies are currently limited to a minority of patients and indications, highlighting the need for more effective and novel approaches. Indeed, an extraordinary amount of preclinical and clinical investigation is exploring the therapeutic potential of negative and positive costimulatory molecules. Insights into the underlying biological mechanisms and functions of these molecules have, however, lagged significantly behind. Such understanding will be essential for the rational design of next-generation immunotherapies. Here, we review the current state of our understanding of T-cell costimulatory mechanisms and checkpoint blockade, primarily of CTLA4 and PD-1, and highlight conceptual gaps in knowledge.Significance: This review provides an overview of immune checkpoint blockade therapy from a basic biology and immunologic perspective for the cancer research community. Cancer Discov; 8(9); 1069-86. ©2018 AACR.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Delivery technologies for cancer immunotherapy

              Immunotherapy has become a powerful clinical strategy for treating cancer. The number of immunotherapy drug approvals has been increasing, with numerous treatments in clinical and preclinical development. However, a key challenge in the broad implementation of immunotherapies for cancer remains the controlled modulation of the immune system, as these therapeutics have serious adverse effects including autoimmunity and nonspecific inflammation. Understanding howto increase the response rates to various classes of immunotherapy is key to improving efficacy and controlling these adverse effects. Advanced biomaterials and drug delivery systems, such as nanoparticles and the use of T cells to deliver therapies, could effectively harness immunotherapies and improve their potency while reducing toxic side effects. Here, we discuss these research advances, as well as the opportunities and challenges for integrating delivery technologies into cancer immunotherapy, and we critically analyse the outlook for these emerging areas.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Journal
                Ther Adv Med Oncol
                Ther Adv Med Oncol
                TAM
                sptam
                Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                1758-8340
                1758-8359
                6 January 2024
                2024
                : 16
                : 17588359231220516
                Affiliations
                [1-17588359231220516]Department of Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
                [2-17588359231220516]Department of Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
                [3-17588359231220516]Department of Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
                [4-17588359231220516]Department of Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
                [5-17588359231220516]Department of Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
                [6-17588359231220516]Department of Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
                [7-17588359231220516]Department of Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
                [8-17588359231220516]Pyrotech (Beijing) Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China
                [9-17588359231220516]Department of Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
                [10-17588359231220516]China Innovation Center of Roche, Shanghai, China
                [11-17588359231220516]Department of Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, No. 1800 Yuntai Road, Shanghai 200123, China
                [12-17588359231220516]Department of Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, No. 1800 Yuntai Road, Shanghai 200123, China
                Author notes
                [*]

                These authors contributed equally to the manuscript and thus shared the first authorship

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1813-9815
                Article
                10.1177_17588359231220516
                10.1177/17588359231220516
                10771754
                38188467
                0e58ca34-5dee-43a9-b4b2-8de6c970fb35
                © The Author(s), 2024

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 4 July 2023
                : 21 November 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: Top-level Clinical Discipline Project of Shanghai Pudong, ;
                Award ID: No. PWYgf2021-07
                Funded by: Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd, ;
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                January-December 2024
                ts1

                advanced malignant tumors,phase i,programmed cell death ligand 1,safety,tqb2450

                Comments

                Comment on this article