2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Action Effects on Visual Perception of Distances: A Multilevel Bayesian Meta-Analysis

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Previous studies have suggested that action constraints influence visual perception of distances. For instance, the greater the effort to cover a distance, the longer people perceive this distance to be. The present multilevel Bayesian meta-analysis (37 studies with 1,035 total participants) supported the existence of a small action-constraint effect on distance estimation, Hedges’s g = 0.29, 95% credible interval = [0.16, 0.47]. This effect varied slightly according to the action-constraint category (effort, weight, tool use) but not according to participants’ motor intention. Some authors have argued that such effects reflect experimental demand biases rather than genuine perceptual effects. Our meta-analysis did not allow us to dismiss this possibility, but it also did not support it. We provide field-specific conventions for interpreting action-constraint effect sizes and the minimum sample sizes required to detect them with various levels of power. We encourage researchers to help us update this meta-analysis by directly uploading their published or unpublished data to our online repository ( https://osf.io/bc3wn/ ).

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Introduction to Meta-Analysis

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Evaluating Effect Size in Psychological Research: Sense and Nonsense

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Psychological Science
                Psychol Sci
                SAGE Publications
                0956-7976
                1467-9280
                May 2020
                April 09 2020
                May 2020
                : 31
                : 5
                : 488-504
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Laboratoire de Psychologie et NeuroCognition (LPNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Grenoble Alpes
                [2 ]Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University
                [3 ]Laboratoire sur les Interactions Cognition-Action-Émotion (LICAÉ), Université Paris Nanterre
                Article
                10.1177/0956797619900336
                32271656
                0dd38cb1-4b0c-4033-9440-064f7e0fd0c2
                © 2020

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article