15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Outcomes of Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma in the Netherlands: A Nationwide Retrospective Analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Large multicenter series on outcomes and predictors of survival after distal pancreatectomy (DP) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are scarce.

          Methods

          Adults who underwent DP for PDAC in 17 Dutch pancreatic centers between January 2005 and September 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome was survival, and predictors of survival were identified using Cox regression analysis.

          Results

          In total, 761 consecutive patients after DP were assessed, of whom 620 patients were excluded because of non-PDAC histopathology ( n = 616) or a lack of data ( n = 4), leaving a total of 141 patients included in the study [45 % ( n = 63) male, mean age 64 years (SD = 10)]. Multivisceral resection was performed in 43 patients (30 %) and laparoscopic resection was performed in 7 patients (5 %). A major complication (Clavien–Dindo score of III or higher) occurred in 46 patients (33 %). Mean tumor size was 44 mm (SD 23), and histopathological examination showed 70 R0 resections (50 %), while 30-day and 90-day mortality was 3 and 6 %, respectively. Overall, 63 patients (45 %) received adjuvant chemotherapy. Median survival was 17 months [interquartile range (IQR) 13–21], with a median follow-up of 17 months (IQR 8–29). Cumulative survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 64, 29, and 22 %, respectively. Independent predictors of worse postoperative survival were R1/R2 resection [hazard ratio (HR) 1.6, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.1–2.4], pT3/pT4 stage (HR 1.9, 95 % CI 1.3–2.9), a major complication (HR 1.7, 95 % CI 1.1–2.5), and not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 1.5, 95 % CI 1.0–2.3).

          Conclusion

          Survival after DP for PDAC is poor and is related to resection margin, tumor stage, surgical complications, and adjuvant chemotherapy. Further studies should assess to what extent prevention of surgical complications and more extensive use of adjuvant chemotherapy can improve survival.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS).

          The lymph node (Ln) status of patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is an important predictor of survival. The survival benefit of extended lymphadenectomy during pancreatectomy is, however, disputed, and there is no true definition of the optimal extent of the lymphadenectomy. The aim of this study was to formulate a definition for standard lymphadenectomy during pancreatectomy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Advanced-stage pancreatic cancer: therapy options.

            Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is one of the most aggressive cancers, and surgical resection is a requirement for a potential cure. However, the majority of patients are diagnosed with advanced-stage disease, either metastatic (50%) or locally advanced cancer (30%). Although palliative chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with metastatic disease, management of locally advanced adenocarcinoma is controversial. Several treatment options, including extended surgical resections, neoadjuvant therapy with subsequent resections, as well as palliative radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, should be considered. However, there is little evidence available to support treatment options for locally advanced disease. As valid predictive biomarkers for stratification of therapy are not available today, future trials need to define the role of the different treatment options. This Review summarizes the current evidence and discusses available treatment options for both locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy.

              Retrograde distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy is the standard procedure for cancers of the body and tail of the pancreas. However, this procedure has limitations in terms of the posterior extent of resection and the ability to achieve a complete N1 node resection.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31-20-566 9111 , m.g.besselink@amc.uva.nl , m.g.besselink@amc.nl
                Journal
                Ann Surg Oncol
                Ann. Surg. Oncol
                Annals of Surgical Oncology
                Springer US (New York )
                1068-9265
                1534-4681
                27 October 2015
                27 October 2015
                2016
                : 23
                : 585-591
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
                [ ]Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Surgery, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Surgery, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
                Article
                4930
                10.1245/s10434-015-4930-4
                4718962
                26508153
                0dad687d-5b48-4238-af90-45d7e5ec16e6
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 28 July 2015
                Categories
                Pancreatic Tumors
                Custom metadata
                © Society of Surgical Oncology 2016

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                Oncology & Radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article