15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Variation in photosynthetic induction between rice accessions and its potential for improving productivity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          • Photosynthetic induction describes the transient increase in leaf CO 2 uptake with an increase in light. During induction, efficiency is lower than at steady state. Under field conditions of fluctuating light, this lower efficiency during induction may cost > 20% of potential crop assimilation. Accelerating induction would boost photosynthetic and resource‐use efficiencies.

          • Variation between rice accessions and potential for accelerating induction was analysed by gas exchange. Induction during shade to sun transitions of 14 accessions representing five subpopulations from the 3000 Rice Genome Project Panel (3K RGP) was analysed.

          • Differences of 109% occurred in the CO 2 fixed during the first 300 s of induction, 117% in the half‐time to completion of induction, and 65% in intrinsic water‐use efficiency during induction, between the highest and lowest performing accessions. Induction in three accessions with contrasting responses (AUS 278, NCS 771 A and IR64‐21) was compared for a range of [CO 2] to analyse limitations. This showed in vivo capacity for carboxylation at Rubisco ( V c,max), and not stomata, as the primary limitation to induction, with significant differences between accessions.

          • Variation in nonsteady‐state efficiency greatly exceeded that at steady state, suggesting a new and more promising opportunity for selection of greater crop photosynthetic efficiency in this key food crop.

          Abstract

          See also the Commentary on this article by McAusland & Murchie, 227: 989–991 .

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves.

          A series of experiments is presented investigating short term and long term changes of the nature of the response of rate of CO2 assimilation to intercellular p(CO2). The relationships between CO2 assimilation rate and biochemical components of leaf photosynthesis, such as ribulose-bisphosphate (RuP2) carboxylase-oxygenase activity and electron transport capacity are examined and related to current theory of CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. It was found that the response of the rate of CO2 assimilation to irradiance, partial pressure of O2, p(O2), and temperature was different at low and high intercellular p(CO2), suggesting that CO2 assimilation rate is governed by different processes at low and high intercellular p(CO2). In longer term changes in CO2 assimilation rate, induced by different growth conditions, the initial slope of the response of CO2 assimilation rate to intercellular p(CO2) could be correlated to in vitro measurements of RuP2 carboxylase activity. Also, CO2 assimilation rate at high p(CO2) could be correlated to in vitro measurements of electron transport rate. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that CO2 assimilation rate is limited by the RuP2 saturated rate of the RuP2 carboxylase-oxygenase at low intercellular p(CO2) and by the rate allowed by RuP2 regeneration capacity at high intercellular p(CO2).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: a guide to good practice and understanding some new applications.

            Chlorophyll fluorescence is a non-invasive measurement of photosystem II (PSII) activity and is a commonly used technique in plant physiology. The sensitivity of PSII activity to abiotic and biotic factors has made this a key technique not only for understanding the photosynthetic mechanisms but also as a broader indicator of how plants respond to environmental change. This, along with low cost and ease of collecting data, has resulted in the appearance of a large array of instrument types for measurement and calculated parameters which can be bewildering for the new user. Moreover, its accessibility can lead to misuse and misinterpretation when the underlying photosynthetic processes are not fully appreciated. This review is timely because it sits at a point of renewed interest in chlorophyll fluorescence where fast measurements of photosynthetic performance are now required for crop improvement purposes. Here we help the researcher make choices in terms of protocols using the equipment and expertise available, especially for field measurements. We start with a basic overview of the principles of fluorescence analysis and provide advice on best practice for taking pulse amplitude-modulated measurements. We also discuss a number of emerging techniques for contemporary crop and ecology research, where we see continual development and application of analytical techniques to meet the new challenges that have arisen in recent years. We end the review by briefly discussing the emerging area of monitoring fluorescence, chlorophyll fluorescence imaging, field phenotyping, and remote sensing of crops for yield and biomass enhancement.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield.

              Increasing the yield potential of the major food grain crops has contributed very significantly to a rising food supply over the past 50 years, which has until recently more than kept pace with rising global demand. Whereas improved photosynthetic efficiency has played only a minor role in the remarkable increases in productivity achieved in the last half century, further increases in yield potential will rely in large part on improved photosynthesis. Here we examine inefficiencies in photosynthetic energy transduction in crops from light interception to carbohydrate synthesis, and how classical breeding, systems biology, and synthetic biology are providing new opportunities to develop more productive germplasm. Near-term opportunities include improving the display of leaves in crop canopies to avoid light saturation of individual leaves and further investigation of a photorespiratory bypass that has already improved the productivity of model species. Longer-term opportunities include engineering into plants carboxylases that are better adapted to current and forthcoming CO(2) concentrations, and the use of modeling to guide molecular optimization of resource investment among the components of the photosynthetic apparatus, to maximize carbon gain without increasing crop inputs. Collectively, these changes have the potential to more than double the yield potential of our major crops.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                w.p.quick@irri.org
                slong@illinois.edu
                Journal
                New Phytol
                New Phytol
                10.1111/(ISSN)1469-8137
                NPH
                The New Phytologist
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0028-646X
                1469-8137
                03 March 2020
                August 2020
                : 227
                : 4 ( doiID: 10.1111/nph.v227.4 )
                : 1097-1108
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL 61801 USA
                [ 2 ] C 4 Rice Center International Rice Research Institute Los Baños Laguna 4031 Philippines
                [ 3 ] High Resolution Plant Phenomics Centre Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) Plant Industry Canberra ACT 2601 Australia
                [ 4 ] Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign Urbana IL 61801 USA
                [ 5 ] Department of Plant Sciences University of Cambridge Cambridge CB2 3EA UK
                [ 6 ] Department of Animal and Plant Sciences University of Sheffield Western Bank Sheffield S10 2TN UK
                [ 7 ] Department of Plant Biology University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign Urbana IL 61801 USA
                [ 8 ] Lancaster Environment Centre Lancaster University Lancaster LA1 4YQ UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Authors for correspondence:

                Stephen P. Long

                Tel: +1 217 244 0881

                Email: slong@ 123456illinois.edu

                W. Paul Quick

                Tel: +63 2 8580 5600

                Email: w.p.quick@ 123456irri.org

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3903-0402
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4832-4376
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6951-2835
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4423-4100
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8501-7164
                Article
                NPH16454 2019-31571
                10.1111/nph.16454
                7383871
                32124982
                0d95bddc-9092-41f9-ae99-f50f58e4583c
                © 2020 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2020 New Phytologist Trust

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 25 October 2019
                : 13 January 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 1, Pages: 12, Words: 8023
                Funding
                Funded by: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100000865;
                Funded by: Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100011929;
                Funded by: Department for International Development (UK Aid) , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100000278;
                Award ID: OPP1172157
                Funded by: US Borlaug Fellows in Global Food Security Fellowship
                Funded by: College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100006300;
                Categories
                Full Paper
                Research
                Full Papers
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                August 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.8.5 mode:remove_FC converted:27.07.2020

                Plant science & Botany
                dynamic photosynthesis,food security,photosynthesis,photosynthetic induction,rice,rubisco activase,stomata,water‐use efficiency

                Comments

                Comment on this article