9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Incidence of posterior capsule opacification following the implantation of a foldable hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens: a 4 year follow-up study Translated title: Incidência da opacificação da cápsula posterior após o implante de uma lente intraocular acrílica hidrofílica dobrável: seguimento de 4 anos

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose: To evaluate the incidence of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) four years after the implantation of a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL). Methods: Fifty-eight randomly selected eyes from 58 patients were analyzed four years after phacoemulsification and Ioflex IOL implantation. The patients underwent an ophthalmic examination to detect PCO and a detailed medical history was obtained. The patients' charts were reviewed for their corrected distance visual acuity prior to the IOL implantation, as well as for one month postoperatively. The Student's t-test was used for statistical analysis. Results: The mean age of patients without PCO was 74.6 ± 9.5 years, compared to 70.3 ± 15 years in patients with PCO. Four years after surgery, 39 of the 58 eyes (67%) had detectable PCO and 24 eyes (41.3%) had decreased visual acuity (VA) due to PCO. These patients were referred for Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy. Three patients (5.1%) had decreased VA due to glaucoma, IOL opacification, or age-related macular degeneration. Twelve eyes (20.7%) presented mild PCO with unchanged VA. Systemic arterial hypertension was reported by 45% of the patients, and in 3.5% of these cases this was associated with diabetes mellitus. Conclusion: This study found the incidence of PCO to be 67% four years after phacoemulsification and Ioflex IOL implantation.

          Translated abstract

          Objetivo: Avaliar a incidência da opacificação da cápsula posterior com o implante de uma lente intraocular acrílica hidrofílica. Métodos: Cinquenta e oito olhos, de 58 pacientes, selecionados de forma aleatória, foram examinados 4 anos após a cirurgia de facoemulsificação com implante da lente intraocular Ioflex em uma campanha comunitária para pessoas carentes. Os pacientes foram submetidos ao exame oftalmológico a fim de detectar opacificação da cápsula posterior. Foi obtido histórico médico detalhado. A acuidade visual corrigida antes e 1 mês após a cirurgia foi obtida através de revisão em prontuário médico. O teste t de student foi utilizado para a análise estatística. Resultados: A idade média dos pacientes sem opacificação da cápsula posterior foi 74,6 ± 9,5 anos, e 70,3 ± 15 anos nos pacientes com opacificação da cápsula posterior. Após 4 anos da cirurgia, 39 olhos (67%) foram diagnosticados com opacificação da cápsula posterior, e 24 olhos (41,3%) tiveram redução da acuidade visual causada pela opacificação da cápsula posterior, sendo encaminhados para realização de capsulotomia com Nd:YAG laser. Três olhos (5,1%) tiveram redução da acuidade visual causada por glaucoma, opacificação da lente intraocular e degeneração macular relacionada á idade. Em outros 12 olhos (20,7%) que apresentaram opacificação da cápsula posterior, a acuidade visual ficou mantida. Dentre as doenças sistêmicas, a hipertensão arterial foi relatada por 45% da amostra avaliada e 3,5% referiram diabetes mellitus. Conclusão: O estudo encontrou incidência de 67% de opacificação da cápsula posterior na lente intraocular Ioflex 4 anos após a cirurgia.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Neodymium:YAG laser rates after bilateral implantation of hydrophobic or hydrophilic multifocal intraocular lenses: twenty-four month retrospective comparative study.

          To compare 2-year neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) laser capsulotomy rates after bilateral implantation of hydrophobic or hydrophilic multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Clinical consequences of acrylic intraocular lens material and design: Nd:YAG-laser capsulotomy rates in 3 x 300 eyes 5 years after phacoemulsification

            Background/aims To investigate the incidence of Nd:YAG-laser treatment for posterior capsular opacification (PCO) over a period of 5 years from phacoemulsification in an unselected population, comparing outcomes for three acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs). Methods Retrospective longitudinal cohort study comprising 900 eyes. Three subgroups of 300 eyes, receiving the AR40, AR40e (Abbott Medical Optics, Santa Ana, California), or BL27 (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, New York) IOL respectively, were compared. Data on patient age, gender, IOL type, dates of cataract surgery, Nd:YAG-laser treatment and/or death, and visual acuities before/after cataract surgery/Nd:YAG-laser treatment were collected from five sources: cataract operation register, patient administration system, quality control system for cataract operations, Nd:YAG-laser treatment register and clinical patient records. Results 216 eyes (24%) received Nd:YAG-laser treatment over a 5-year period. Statistically significant differences (p<0.001, χ2 test) were found between treatment rates for the three IOLs: AR40 73 eyes (24%), BL27 91 eyes (30%) and AR40e 52 eyes (17%). Eyes of patients who died during the follow-up period had fewer treatments (23/266, 8.6%) than eyes of patients living (193/634, 30%) at the end of the follow-up period. Conclusion In comparison with a hydrophobic acrylic IOL with sharp posterior optic edge, a hydrophilic acrylic IOL was associated with almost twice the number of Nd:YAG-laser treatments over the 5-year period. The results are useful for discussing the economic long-term consequences of choosing an IOL with a design that makes PCO development more or less likely. Caution is advised when applying data from post-mortem PCO studies on living populations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Changes in posterior capsule opacification after poly(methyl methacrylate), silicone, and acrylic intraocular lens implantation.

              To prospectively evaluate the progression of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) after poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), silicone, and acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Hayashi Eye Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan. Three hundred eyes of 300 patients scheduled to have IOL implantation were initially randomized into 3 groups based on IOL type: PMMA, silicone, or acrylic. Of the 300 eyes, 269 completed the follow-up. The PCO density in these eyes was measured 1 week and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively using special computer software developed for the Scheimpflug videophotography system. Visual acuity and the incidence of neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) laser capsulotomy were also examined. Three months postoperatively and later, the mean PCO value in the PMMA group increased significantly (P <.0001); the increase in the silicone and acrylic groups was not significant. The PCO value in the PMMA group was significantly greater than in the silicone or acrylic group (P <.0001). The PCO value in the acrylic group was slightly less than in the silicone group at 18 and 24 months, but the difference was marginal. The survival rate not requiring Nd:YAG capsulotomy was least in the PMMA group, followed by the silicone and acrylic groups in that order (P <.0001). The mean logMAR visual acuity in the PMMA group increased postoperatively and was worse than in the silicone or acrylic group. The degree of PCO after PMMA IOL implantation progressed significantly with time, while the progression after silicone and acrylic IOL implantation was slight. Therefore, PCO in eyes with a PMMA IOL was significantly more extensive than in those with a silicone or acrylic IOL and resulted in marked impairment of visual acuity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Journal
                abo
                Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia
                Arq. Bras. Oftalmol.
                Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (São Paulo )
                1678-2925
                August 2014
                : 77
                : 4
                : 222-224
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Universidade de São Paulo Brazil
                [2 ] Fundação Leiria de Andrade Brazil
                [3 ] Fundação Altino Ventura Brazil
                Article
                S0004-27492014000400222
                10.5935/0004-2749.20140057
                0d5ed0b8-6e0e-45d2-aacd-a19f9261f861

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Self URI (journal page): http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0004-2749&lng=en
                Categories
                OPHTHALMOLOGY

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                Posterior capsule of the lens,Capsule opacification,Postoperative complications,Cataract/epidemiology,Visual acuity,Cápsula posterior do cristalino,Opacificação da cápsula,Complicações pósoperatórias,Catarata/epidemiologia,Acuidade visual

                Comments

                Comment on this article