0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The McMaster Health Information Research Unit: Over a Quarter-Century of Health Informatics Supporting Evidence-Based Medicine

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Evidence-based medicine (EBM) emerged from McMaster University in the 1980-1990s, which emphasizes the integration of the best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values. The Health Information Research Unit (HiRU) was created at McMaster University in 1985 to support EBM. Early on, digital health informatics took the form of teaching clinicians how to search MEDLINE with modems and phone lines. Searching and retrieval of published articles were transformed as electronic platforms provided greater access to clinically relevant studies, systematic reviews, and clinical practice guidelines, with PubMed playing a pivotal role. In the early 2000s, the HiRU introduced Clinical Queries—validated search filters derived from the curated, gold-standard, human-appraised Hedges dataset—to enhance the precision of searches, allowing clinicians to hone their queries based on study design, population, and outcomes. Currently, almost 1 million articles are added to PubMed annually. To filter through this volume of heterogenous publications for clinically important articles, the HiRU team and other researchers have been applying classical machine learning, deep learning, and, increasingly, large language models (LLMs). These approaches are built upon the foundation of gold-standard annotated datasets and humans in the loop for active machine learning. In this viewpoint, we explore the evolution of health informatics in supporting evidence search and retrieval processes over the past 25+ years within the HiRU, including the evolving roles of LLMs and responsible artificial intelligence, as we continue to facilitate the dissemination of knowledge, enabling clinicians to integrate the best available evidence into their clinical practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of treatment from Medline: analytical survey.

            To develop and test optimal Medline search strategies for retrieving sound clinical studies on prevention or treatment of health disorders. Analytical survey. 161 clinical journals indexed in Medline for the year 2000. Sensitivity, specificity, precision, and accuracy of 4862 unique terms in 18 404 combinations. Only 1587 (24.2%) of 6568 articles on treatment met criteria for testing clinical interventions. Combinations of search terms reached peak sensitivities of 99.3% (95% confidence interval 98.7% to 99.8%) at a specificity of 70.4% (69.8% to 70.9%). Compared with best single terms, best multiple terms increased sensitivity for sound studies by 4.1% (absolute increase), but with substantial loss of specificity (absolute difference 23.7%) when sensitivity was maximised. When terms were combined to maximise specificity, 97.4% (97.3% to 97.6%) was achieved, about the same as that achieved by the best single term (97.6%, 97.4% to 97.7%). The strategies newly reported in this paper outperformed other validated search strategies except for two strategies that had slightly higher specificity (98.1% and 97.6% v 97.4%) but lower sensitivity (42.0% and 92.8% v 93.1%). New empirical search strategies have been validated to optimise retrieval from Medline of articles reporting high quality clinical studies on prevention or treatment of health disorders.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Users' guides to the medical literature.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Med Internet Res
                J Med Internet Res
                JMIR
                Journal of Medical Internet Research
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1439-4456
                1438-8871
                2024
                31 July 2024
                : 26
                : e58764
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Health Information Research Unit Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact McMaster University Hamilton, ON Canada
                [2 ] Department of Computing and Data Science Birmingham City University Birmingham United Kingdom
                [3 ] Department of Medicine McMaster University Hamilton, ON Canada
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Cynthia Lokker lokkerc@ 123456mcmaster.ca
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2436-4290
                https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3635-2652
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7851-2327
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2810-6942
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9308-173X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1453-3196
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3331-8766
                Article
                v26i1e58764
                10.2196/58764
                11325105
                39083765
                0c8b632a-4d45-414f-a03b-bf6c24791d92
                ©Cynthia Lokker, K Ann McKibbon, Muhammad Afzal, Tamara Navarro, Lori-Ann Linkins, R Brian Haynes, Alfonso Iorio. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 31.07.2024.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (ISSN 1438-8871), is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 28 March 2024
                : 8 June 2024
                : 15 June 2024
                : 16 July 2024
                Categories
                Viewpoint
                Viewpoint

                Medicine
                health informatics,evidence-based medicine,information retrieval,evidence-based,health information,boolean,natural language processing,nlp,journal,article,health information research unit,hiru

                Comments

                Comment on this article