2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Systemic immune‐inflammation index (SII) predicted clinical outcome in patients with coronary artery disease

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="d1958660e309">This study examines the predictive value of a novel systemic immune-inflammation index (SII, platelet × neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio) in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references2

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          P589Prognostic value of systemic immune-inflammation index in patients with chronic heart failure

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Association of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio with the Severity and Morphology of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques Detected by Multidetector Computerized Tomography

            Background Studies have demonstrated a consistent relationship between white blood cell (WBC) counts and coronary artery disease (CAD). The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been considered as a potential marker for identifying individuals under risk of CAD and associated events. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether NLR was associated with the severity and morphology of coronary atherosclerotic plaques shown by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Methods Our study population consisted of 684 patients who underwent dual-source 64 slice MDCT for the assessment of CAD. Coronary arteries were evaluated on a 16-segment basis and critical coronary plaque was described as luminal narrowing > 50%, whereas plaque morphology was assessed on a per segment basis. Total WBC, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts were determined using commercially available assay kits. Results WBC count [7700 (6400-8800) vs. 6800 (5700-7900), p < 0.05] and NLR [2.40 (1.98-3.07) vs. 1.86 (1.50-2.38), p < 0.001] were found to be higher in patients with critical stenosis than in those without. In the binary logistic regression analysis, NLR was a predictor of critical stenosis (odds ratio, 1.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-2.03, p < 0.001). NLR levels differed among plaque morphology subtypes (p < 0.05) and was significantly higher in non-calcified plaque (NCP) compared to mixed plaque (MP) and calcified plaque (CP) (p < 0.05). In the multinomial logistic regression analysis, NLR was found to be an independent predictor of NCP, MP and CP (p < 0.001). Conclusions These data show that NLR is associated with both the severity and morphology of coronary atherosclerotic disease.
              Bookmark

              Author and article information

              Contributors
              (View ORCID Profile)
              Journal
              European Journal of Clinical Investigation
              Eur J Clin Invest
              Wiley
              0014-2972
              1365-2362
              May 2020
              May 11 2020
              May 2020
              : 50
              : 5
              Affiliations
              [1 ]Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine Healthcare and Management Center Taipei Taiwan
              [2 ]Faculty of Medicine National Yang‐Ming University Taipei Taiwan
              [3 ]Institute of Clinical Medicine and Cardiovascular Research Center National Yang‐Ming University Taipei Taiwan
              [4 ]Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taoyuan Branch Taoyuan Taiwan
              [5 ]Healthcare and Management Center Taipei Taiwan
              [6 ]Department of Medical Education Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan
              Article
              10.1111/eci.13230
              32291748
              0c6adb2f-836a-4d32-984b-0a2588281511
              © 2020

              http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

              http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

              History

              Comments

              Comment on this article