8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Marker effects and heritability estimates using additive-dominance genomic architectures via artificial neural networks in Coffea canephora

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Many methodologies are used to predict the genetic merit in animals and plants, but some of them require priori assumptions that may increase the complexity of the model. Artificial neural network (ANN) has advantage to not require priori assumptions about the relationships between inputs and the output allowing great flexibility to handle different types of complex non-additive effects, such as dominance and epistasis. Despite this advantage, the biological interpretability of ANNs is still limited. The aim of this research was to estimate the heritability and markers effects for two traits in Coffea canephora using an additive-dominance architecture ANN and to compare it with genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP). The data used consists of 51 clones of C. canephora varietal Conilon, 32 of varietal group Robusta and 82 intervarietal hybrids. From this, 165 phenotyped individuals were genotyped for 14,387 SNPs. Due to the high computational cost of ANNs, we used Bagging decision tree to reduce the dimensionality of the data, selecting the markers that accumulated 70% of the total importance. An ANN with three hidden layers was run, each varying from 1 to 40 neurons summing 64,000 neural networks. The network architectures with the best predictive ability were selected. The best architectures were composed by 4, 15, and 33 neurons in the first, second and third hidden layers, respectively, for yield, and by 13, 20, and 24 neurons, respectively for rust resistance. The predictive ability was greater when using ANN with three hidden layers than using one hidden layer and GBLUP, with 0.72 and 0.88 for yield and coffee leaf rust resistance, respectively. The concordance rate (CR) of the 10% larger markers effects among the methods varied between 10% and 13.8%, for additive effects and between 5.4% and 11.9% for dominance effects. The narrow-sense (

          ) and dominance-only (
          ) heritability estimates were 0.25 and 0.06, respectively, for yield, and 0.67 and 0.03, respectively for rust resistance. The ANN was able to estimate the heritabilities from an additive-dominance genomic architectures and the ANN with three hidden layers obtained best predictive ability when compared with those obtained from GBLUP and ANN with one hidden layer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Learning representations by back-propagating errors

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Genomic Selection in Plant Breeding: Methods, Models, and Perspectives.

            Genomic selection (GS) facilitates the rapid selection of superior genotypes and accelerates the breeding cycle. In this review, we discuss the history, principles, and basis of GS and genomic-enabled prediction (GP) as well as the genetics and statistical complexities of GP models, including genomic genotype×environment (G×E) interactions. We also examine the accuracy of GP models and methods for two cereal crops and two legume crops based on random cross-validation. GS applied to maize breeding has shown tangible genetic gains. Based on GP results, we speculate how GS in germplasm enhancement (i.e., prebreeding) programs could accelerate the flow of genes from gene bank accessions to elite lines. Recent advances in hyperspectral image technology could be combined with GS and pedigree-assisted breeding.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A primer on deep learning in genomics

              Deep learning methods are a class of machine learning techniques capable of identifying highly complex patterns in large datasets. Here, we provide a perspective and primer on deep learning applications for genome analysis. We discuss successful applications in the fields of regulatory genomics, variant calling and pathogenicity scores. We include general guidance for how to effectively use deep learning methods as well as a practical guide to tools and resources. This primer is accompanied by an interactive online tutorial.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: SoftwareRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curation
                Role: Data curation
                Role: Writing – review & editing
                Role: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                26 January 2022
                2022
                : 17
                : 1
                : e0262055
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America
                [2 ] Department of Statistics, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
                [3 ] Rubber Tree and Agroforestry Systems Research Center, Campinas Agronomy Institute (IAC), Votuporanga, São Paulo, Brazil
                [4 ] Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Embrapa Coffee, Brasília, DF, Brazil
                [5 ] Department of General Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
                [6 ] Department of Plant Science, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
                [7 ] Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro, Iturama, Minas Gerais, Brazil
                Government College University Faisalabad, PAKISTAN
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8456-9349
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0438-5123
                Article
                PONE-D-21-25503
                10.1371/journal.pone.0262055
                8791507
                35081139
                0c590404-fd92-455a-9082-1ee6ea24719c
                © 2022 Coelho de Sousa et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 6 August 2021
                : 15 December 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 2, Pages: 14
                Funding
                Funded by: Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel - Brazil (CAPES)
                Award ID: Finance Code 001
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Brazilian Coffee Research and Development Consortium (CBP&D/Café)
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: National Institute of Science and Technology of Coffee (INCT-Café)
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Foundation for Research Support of the State of Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
                Award Recipient :
                This work was financially supported by the Brazilian Coffee Research and Development Consortium (CBP&D/Café), the National Institute of Science and Technology of Coffee (INCT-Café), the Foundation for Research Support of the State of Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG), the National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education people (CAPES) - Finance Code 001.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Computer and Information Sciences
                Artificial Intelligence
                Artificial Neural Networks
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Computational Biology
                Computational Neuroscience
                Artificial Neural Networks
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Computational Neuroscience
                Artificial Neural Networks
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Cell Biology
                Cellular Types
                Animal Cells
                Neurons
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cellular Neuroscience
                Neurons
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Heredity
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Genomics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Plant Science
                Plant Anatomy
                Leaves
                Computer and Information Sciences
                Neural Networks
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Neural Networks
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Genomics
                Plant Genomics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Bioengineering
                Biotechnology
                Plant Biotechnology
                Plant Genomics
                Engineering and Technology
                Bioengineering
                Biotechnology
                Plant Biotechnology
                Plant Genomics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Plant Science
                Plant Biotechnology
                Plant Genomics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Plant Genetics
                Plant Genomics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Plant Science
                Plant Genetics
                Plant Genomics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms
                Custom metadata
                The data are owned by Brazilian Coffee Breeding Program. Interested researchers may negotiate data sharing agreements with the participating companies (Embrapa, Epamig and Universidade Federal de Viçosa), which can be facilitated by Eveline Caixeta ( eveline.caixeta@ 123456embrapa.br ) or Antonio Carlos Baião de Oliveira ( antonio.baiao@ 123456embrapa.br ).

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article