32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Management of a Facilitated Aesthetic Orthodontic Treatment with Clear Aligners and Minimally Invasive Corticotomy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Accelerating orthodontic tooth movement has become a topical issue and the corticotomy seems to be the only effective and safe technique reported in the literature. Simultaneously, aesthetic orthodontic treatment with removable clear aligners has become commonly requested. The aim of this paper is to illustrate the management of facilitated aesthetic orthodontic treatment, a combined approach including piezocision corticotomy and clear aligners for orthodontic treatment. Orthodontic planning for traditional clear aligners should be modified to take advantage of the corticotomy technique in order to facilitate the most difficult orthodontic movements needed to achieve treatment completion, where each aligner will be used for four days rather than 15 days for a total time of four months. A corticotomy with a modified minimally invasive flapless piezocision technique should be performed in both jaws at the same time, before the time window of the orthodontic treatment, where the most difficult orthodontic movements are planned. Treatment planning where difficult orthodontic movements, such as anterior open-bite closure and extraction space closure, are easily managed with clear aligners and are presented as examples of facilitated aesthetic orthodontic treatment application. The combination between aesthetic treatment with clear aligners and modified piezocision corticotomy, if carefully planned, seems to represent a synergy that achieves the current goals of orthodontic treatment. The primary objectives of this combination should be facilitating difficult orthodontic movements and reducing treatment duration.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Prevalence and association analysis of obstructive sleep apnea with gender and age differences - Results of SHIP-Trend

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Braces versus Invisalign®: gingival parameters and patients’ satisfaction during treatment: a cross-sectional study

            Background Fixed orthodontic appliances (FOA) temporarily interfere with periodontal health of patients, as the appliance complicates oral hygiene. The use of aligners in orthodontic therapy increased strongly during the last decade. In the literature, the reports about effects of aligner treatment on oral hygiene and gingival conditions are scarce. This cross-sectional study evaluated oral hygiene and patient’s satisfaction during orthodontic treatment of patients with FOA or Invisalign®. Methods 100 patients (FOA = 50, Invisalign® = 50) were included who underwent orthodontic treatment for more than 6 months. Clinical examinations were performed to evaluate patients’ periodontal condition and were compared with clinical data at the beginning of the orthodontic treatment. Oral hygiene, patients’ satisfaction and dietary habits were documented by a detailed questionnaire. For statistical analysis, the Mann–Whitney U-Test and Fisher’s Exact Test were used; as multiple testing was applied, a Bonferroni correction was performed. Results At the time of clinical examinations, patients with FOA were in orthodontic therapy for 12.9 ± 7.2 months, whereas patients with Invisalign® were in orthodontic therapy for 12.6 ± 7.4 months. Significantly better gingival health conditions were recorded in Invisalign® patients (GI: 0.54 ± 0.50 for FOA versus 0.35 ± 0.34 for Invisalign®; SBI: 15.2 ± 7.6 for FOA versus 7.6 ± 4.1 for Invisalign®), whereas the amount of dental plaque was also less but not significantly different (API: 37.7 % ± 21.9 for FOA versus 27.8 % ± 24.6 for Invisalign®). The evaluation of the questionnaire showed greater patients’ satisfaction in patients treated with Invisalign® than with FOA. Conclusion Patients treated with Invisalign® have a better periodontal health and greater satisfaction during orthodontic treatment than patients treated with FOA. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12903-015-0060-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The biology of fracture healing. An overview for clinicians. Part I.

              The bone healing process normally unites fractures, arthrodeses, osteotomies, and bone grafting operations. The process normally proceeds in successive stages named the fracture, granulation, and modeling/remodeling stages. A separate regional acceleratory phenomenon speeds up each of the other stages. The osteoclast and osteoblast cells that make intercellular substances of each stage do not exist in sufficient numbers to heal the bone at the moment of fracture or operation. They are made by local multicellular mediator mechanisms that contain precursor and supporting cells, capillaries, lymph, and innervation, plus local autocrine and paracrine regulation. Under the influences of local and systemic agents, these mediator mechanisms determine whether new local osteoclasts and osteoblasts will appear, in addition to when, where, how many, what kind, and for how long. Errors in those functions can then lead to several kinds of retarded or otherwise abnormal bone healing that will be discussed in Part II of this work.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Dent J (Basel)
                Dent J (Basel)
                dentistry
                Dentistry Journal
                MDPI
                2304-6767
                15 February 2020
                March 2020
                : 8
                : 1
                : 19
                Affiliations
                [1 ]MeSVA, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila AQ, Italy; silvia.caruso@ 123456univaq.it (S.C.); stefanozemaz@ 123456libero.it (S.Z.); roberto.gatto@ 123456cc.univaq.it (R.G.)
                [2 ]IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy; atanazdarvizeh@ 123456gmail.com
                [3 ]Dental School, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and IRCCS San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3651-1251
                Article
                dentistry-08-00019
                10.3390/dj8010019
                7148540
                32075255
                0bff6864-3f48-496e-8bc9-ee692e12b475
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 18 September 2019
                : 12 February 2020
                Categories
                Article

                orthodontic tooth movement,aesthetics,clear aligner appliances,cortical bone injuries,removable orthodontic appliances

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content224

                Cited by6

                Most referenced authors307