12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Prevalence of lameness and associated risk factors in Canadian Holstein-Friesian cows housed in freestall barns.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Lameness is a severe welfare problem and a production-limiting disease in dairy farming. The objectives of this study were to determine prevalence of lameness and investigate cow- and herd-level factors associated with lameness in dairy cows housed in freestall barns in 3 Canadian provinces. A purposive sample of 40 Holstein-Friesian cows was selected from each of 141 dairy farms in Québec, Ontario, and Alberta. In total, 5,637 cows were scored once for lameness (presence of limping when walking). Data collected included information on individual cows (hock lesions, claw length, body condition score, parity, days in milk, and milk production), management practices (floor and stall cleaning routine, bedding routine, and footbath practices), and facility design (stall dimensions, stall base and bedding type, width of feed alley, flooring type, and slipperiness) hypothesized to be risk factors for lameness. Multilevel mixed logistic regression models were constructed (including farm as a random effect and province as a fixed effect). Herd-level lameness prevalence ranged from 0 to 69% (mean = 21%). Lameness prevalence increased with increasing parity; compared with first parity, cows in parity 2, 3, and ≥ 4 had 1.6, 3.3, and 4 times, respectively, higher odds of being lame. Furthermore, the odds of lameness were 1.6 times greater in cows with low body condition score (≤ 2.5) than in cows with a higher body condition score. In addition, injured hocks and overgrown claws were associated with 1.4- and 1.7-fold increased odds of being lame, respectively, whereas every 1 kg increase in daily milk production was associated with a 3% decrease in the odds of being lame. Lameness prevalence was higher in herds with ≤ 100 cows, but lower in barns with a sand or dirt stall base, or with bedding ≥ 2 cm deep. Cows exposed to very slippery floors had 2 times the odds of being lame compared with cows exposed to nonslippery floors. We attributed the wide range of lameness prevalence to the great variability in facilities and management practices among farms. Finally, we inferred that the prevalence of lameness could be decreased by improving management of multiparous, thin, or injured cows and by adopting management practices intended to improve cow comfort, namely the floor's slip resistance and the stall's lying surface.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J. Dairy Sci.
          Journal of dairy science
          American Dairy Science Association
          1525-3198
          0022-0302
          Oct 2015
          : 98
          : 10
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Production Animal Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4N1. Electronic address: lmsolano@ucalgary.ca.
          [2 ] Department of Production Animal Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4N1.
          [3 ] Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1.
          [4 ] Organic Dairy Research Center, University of Guelph, Alfred, Ontario, Canada, K0B 1A0.
          [5 ] Department of Animal Science, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada, G1V 0A6.
          [6 ] Dairy Education and Resource Centre, University of British Columbia, Agassiz, British Columbia, Canada, V0M 1A0.
          Article
          S0022-0302(15)00556-1
          10.3168/jds.2015-9652
          26254526
          0b9bd27f-d35d-4d0e-857d-903e44f04bfc
          History

          animal welfare,cow comfort,dairy cattle,locomotion,management

          Comments

          Comment on this article