23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      “Placebo by Proxy” and “Nocebo by Proxy” in Children: A Review of Parents' Role in Treatment Outcomes

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The “placebo (effect) by proxy” (PbP) concept, introduced by Grelotti and Kaptchuk ( 1), describes a positive effect of a patient's treatment on persons in their surrounding such as family members or healthcare providers, who feel better because the patient is being treated. The PbP effect is a complex dynamic phenomenon which attempts to explain a change in treatment outcome arising from an interaction between a patient and an effect from proxies such as parents, caregivers, physicians or even the media. By extension the effect of the proxy can also have a negative or adverse effect whereby a proxy feels worse when a patient is treated, giving rise to the possibility of a “nocebo (effect) by proxy” (NbP), and by extension can influence a patient's treatment response. While this has yet to be systematically investigated, such an effect could occur when a proxy observes that a treatment is ineffective or is perceived as causing adverse effects leading the patient to experience side effects. In this narrative review, we take these definitions one step further to include the impact of PbP/NbP as they transform to affect the treatment outcome for the patient or child being treated, not just the people surrounding the individual being treated. Following a systematic search of literature on the subject using the Journal of Interdisciplinary Placebo Studies (JIPS) database ( https://jips.online) and PubMed (NCBI) resulted in very few relevant studies, especially in children. The effect of PbP per se has been studied in parents and their children for temper tantrums, acupuncture for postoperative symptoms, as well as for neuroprotection in very preterm-born infants. This paper will review the PbP/NbP concepts, show evidence for its presence in children's treatment outcome and introduce clinical implications. We will also offer suggestions for future research to further our understanding of the role of the proxy in promoting or distracting from treatment benefit in children. Increasing an appreciation of the PbP and NbP phenomena and the role of the proxy in children's treatment should improve research study design and ultimately harness them to improve clinical child healthcare.

          Related collections

          Most cited references90

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A comprehensive review of the placebo effect: recent advances and current thought.

          Our understanding and conceptualization of the placebo effect has shifted in emphasis from a focus on the inert content of a physical placebo agent to the overall simulation of a therapeutic intervention. Research has identified many types of placebo responses driven by different mechanisms depending on the particular context wherein the placebo is given. Some placebo responses, such as analgesia, are initiated and maintained by expectations of symptom change and changes in motivation/emotions. Placebo factors have neurobiological underpinnings and actual effects on the brain and body. They are not just response biases. Other placebo responses result from less conscious processes, such as classical conditioning in the case of immune, hormonal, and respiratory functions. The demonstration of the involvement of placebo mechanisms in clinical trials and routine clinical practice has highlighted interesting considerations for clinical trial design and opened up opportunities for ethical enhancement of these mechanisms in clinical practice.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Implications of Placebo and Nocebo Effects for Clinical Practice: Expert Consensus

            Background Placebo and nocebo effects occur in clinical or laboratory medical contexts after administration of an inert treatment or as part of active treatments and are due to psychobiological mechanisms such as expectancies of the patient. Placebo and nocebo studies have evolved from predominantly methodological research into a far-reaching interdisciplinary field that is unravelling the neurobiological, behavioural and clinical underpinnings of these phenomena in a broad variety of medical conditions. As a consequence, there is an increasing demand from health professionals to develop expert recommendations about evidence-based and ethical use of placebo and nocebo effects for clinical practice. Methods A survey and interdisciplinary expert meeting by invitation was organized as part of the 1st Society for Interdisciplinary Placebo Studies (SIPS) conference in 2017. Twenty-nine internationally recognized placebo researchers participated. Results There was consensus that maximizing placebo effects and minimizing nocebo effects should lead to better treatment outcomes with fewer side effects. Experts particularly agreed on the importance of informing patients about placebo and nocebo effects and training health professionals in patient-clinician communication to maximize placebo and minimize nocebo effects. Conclusions The current paper forms a first step towards developing evidence-based and ethical recommendations about the implications of placebo and nocebo research for medical practice, based on the current state of evidence and the consensus of experts. Future research might focus on how to implement these recommendations, including how to optimize conditions for educating patients about placebo and nocebo effects and providing training for the implementation in clinical practice.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies.

              This article shows that 35 years of empirical research on teacher expectations justifies the following conclusions: (a) Self-fulfilling prophecies in the classroom do occur, but these effects are typically small, they do not accumulate greatly across perceivers or over time, and they may be more likely to dissipate than accumulate; (b) powerful self-fulfilling prophecies may selectively occur among students from stigmatized social groups; (c) whether self-fulfilling prophecies affect intelligence, and whether they in general do more harm than good, remains unclear, and (d) teacher expectations may predict student outcomes more because these expectations are accurate than because they are self-fulfilling. Implications for future research, the role of self-fulfilling prophecies in social problems, and perspectives emphasizing the power of erroneous beliefs to create social reality are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychiatry
                Front Psychiatry
                Front. Psychiatry
                Frontiers in Psychiatry
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-0640
                11 March 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 169
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Pediatrics, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, BC, Canada
                [2] 2Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Medical Center , Ulm, Germany
                [3] 3Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital , Boston, MA, United States
                [4] 4Department of Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, University of Basel , Basel, Switzerland
                [5] 5Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Hospital Tübingen , Tübingen, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Charlotte R. Blease, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, United States

                Reviewed by: Christina Papachristou, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece; Miriam Goebel-Stengel, HELIOS Klinik Rottweil, Germany; Michael Bernstein, Brown University, United States

                *Correspondence: Tim F. Oberlander toberlander@ 123456bcchr.ca

                This article was submitted to Psychosomatic Medicine, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00169
                7078585
                32218746
                0b8d8eaa-b531-4b71-8359-518d2b66929e
                Copyright © 2020 Czerniak, Oberlander, Weimer, Kossowsky and Enck.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 08 April 2019
                : 21 February 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 98, Pages: 10, Words: 8856
                Categories
                Psychiatry
                Review

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                placebo effect,nocebo effect,nonspecific effects,treatment environment,clinical implications

                Comments

                Comment on this article