0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Trajectories of oral bisphosphonate use after hip fractures: a population-based cohort study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Summary

          Bisphosphonates prevent future hip fractures. However, we found that one in six patients with hip fractures had a delay in bisphosphonate initiation and another one-sixth discontinued treatment within 12 months after discharge. Our results highlight the need to address hesitancy in treatment initiation and continuous monitoring.

          Purpose

          Suboptimal antiresorptive use is not well understood. This study investigated trajectories of oral bisphosphonate use following first hip fractures and factors associated with different adherence and persistence trajectories.

          Methods

          We conducted a retrospective study of all patients aged ≥ 50 years dispensed two or more bisphosphonate prescriptions following first hip fracture in Victoria, Australia, from 2012 to 2017. Twelve-month trajectories of bisphosphonate use were categorized using group-based trajectory modeling. Factors associated with different trajectories compared to the persistent adherence trajectory were assessed using multivariate multinomial logistic regression.

          Results

          We identified four patterns of oral bisphosphonate use in 1811 patients: persistent adherence (66%); delayed dispensing (17%); early discontinuation (9%); and late discontinuation (9%). Pre-admission bisphosphonate use was associated with a lower risk of delayed dispensing in both sexes (relative risk [RR] 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21–0.39). Older patients ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\ge$$\end{document} 85 years old versus 50–64 years old, RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.22–0.64) had a lower risk of delayed dispensing. Males with anxiety (RR 9.80, 95% CI 2.24–42.9) and females with previous falls had increased risk of early discontinuation (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.16–2.78).

          Conclusion

          Two-thirds of patients demonstrated good adherence to oral bisphosphonates over 12 months following hip fracture. Efforts to further increase post-discharge antiresorptive use should be sex-specific and address possible persistent uncertainty around delaying treatment initiation.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00198-023-06974-6.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Development and validation of a Hospital Frailty Risk Score focusing on older people in acute care settings using electronic hospital records: an observational study

          Summary Background Older people are increasing users of health care globally. We aimed to establish whether older people with characteristics of frailty and who are at risk of adverse health-care outcomes could be identified using routinely collected data. Methods A three-step approach was used to develop and validate a Hospital Frailty Risk Score from International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) diagnostic codes. First, we carried out a cluster analysis to identify a group of older people (≥75 years) admitted to hospital who had high resource use and diagnoses associated with frailty. Second, we created a Hospital Frailty Risk Score based on ICD-10 codes that characterised this group. Third, in separate cohorts, we tested how well the score predicted adverse outcomes and whether it identified similar groups as other frailty tools. Findings In the development cohort (n=22 139), older people with frailty diagnoses formed a distinct group and had higher non-elective hospital use (33·6 bed-days over 2 years compared with 23·0 bed-days for the group with the next highest number of bed-days). In the national validation cohort (n=1 013 590), compared with the 429 762 (42·4%) patients with the lowest risk scores, the 202 718 (20·0%) patients with the highest Hospital Frailty Risk Scores had increased odds of 30-day mortality (odds ratio 1·71, 95% CI 1·68–1·75), long hospital stay (6·03, 5·92–6·10), and 30-day readmission (1·48, 1·46–1·50). The c statistics (ie, model discrimination) between individuals for these three outcomes were 0·60, 0·68, and 0·56, respectively. The Hospital Frailty Risk Score showed fair overlap with dichotomised Fried and Rockwood scales (kappa scores 0·22, 95% CI 0·15–0·30 and 0·30, 0·22–0·38, respectively) and moderate agreement with the Rockwood Frailty Index (Pearson's correlation coefficient 0·41, 95% CI 0·38–0·47). Interpretation The Hospital Frailty Risk Score provides hospitals and health systems with a low-cost, systematic way to screen for frailty and identify a group of patients who are at greater risk of adverse outcomes and for whom a frailty-attuned approach might be useful. Funding National Institute for Health Research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.

            Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalizability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The STROBE Statement consists of a checklist of 22 items, which relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to cohort studies, case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies, and 4 are specific to each of the 3 study designs. The STROBE Statement provides guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of observational studies and facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of studies by reviewers, journal editors, and readers. This explanatory and elaboration document is intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the STROBE Statement. The meaning and rationale for each checklist item are presented. For each item, 1 or several published examples and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are provided. Examples of useful flow diagrams are also included. The STROBE Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (www.strobe-statement.org) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of observational research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A SAS Procedure Based on Mixture Models for Estimating Developmental Trajectories

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                miriam.leung77@monash.edu
                Journal
                Osteoporos Int
                Osteoporos Int
                Osteoporosis International
                Springer London (London )
                0937-941X
                1433-2965
                10 January 2024
                10 January 2024
                2024
                : 35
                : 4
                : 669-678
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University (Parkville Campus), ( https://ror.org/02bfwt286) 381 Royal Parade, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC 3052 Australia
                [2 ]Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal, ( https://ror.org/0161xgx34) Montreal, Quebec Canada
                [3 ]Centre de Recherche, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, ( https://ror.org/031z68d90) Montreal, QC Canada
                [4 ]Faculty of Pharmacy, Laval University, ( https://ror.org/04sjchr03) Quebec, Canada
                [5 ]Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, ( https://ror.org/02bfwt286) Melbourne, Australia
                [6 ]Pharmacy Department, Austin Health, ( https://ror.org/05dbj6g52) Melbourne, Australia
                [7 ]Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, ( https://ror.org/00cyydd11) Kuopio, Finland
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4259-7058
                Article
                6974
                10.1007/s00198-023-06974-6
                10957648
                38195713
                0b5c2975-dc1a-491f-8aaa-16850484d8b4
                © The Author(s) 2024, corrected publication 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 3 August 2023
                : 7 November 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: Australian Government
                Award ID: Research Training Scholarship
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008710, Dementia Australia Research Foundation;
                Award ID: Yulgilbar Innovation Grant
                Funded by: National Health and Medical Research Council
                Award ID: Dementia Leadership Fellowship
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Monash University
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © International Osteoporosis Foundation and Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation 2024

                Orthopedics
                antiresorptive medication,bisphosphonate,hip fracture,osteoporosis
                Orthopedics
                antiresorptive medication, bisphosphonate, hip fracture, osteoporosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article