5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      How do people distribute their attention while observing The Night Watch ?

      research-article
      , ,
      Perception
      SAGE Publications
      eye-tracking, painting, Rembrandt, salience, texture

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study explored how people look at The Night Watch (1642), Rembrandt's masterpiece. Twenty-one participants each stood in front of the painting for 5 min, while their eyes were recorded with a mobile eye-tracker and their thoughts were verbalized with a think-aloud method. We computed a heatmap of the participants’ attentional distribution using a novel markerless mapping method. The results showed that the participants’ attention was mainly directed at the faces of the two central figures, the bright mascot girl in the painting, and detailed elements such as the apparel of the key figures. The eye-movement analysis and think-aloud data also showed that participants’ attention shifted from the faces of the key figures to other elements of the scene over the course of the 5 min. Our analyses are consistent with the theory that Rembrandt used light and texture to capture the viewer's attention. Finally, the robustness of the eye-tracking method was demonstrated by replicating the study on a smaller replica.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The central fixation bias in scene viewing: selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions.

            Observers show a marked tendency to fixate the center of the screen when viewing scenes on computer monitors. This is often assumed to arise because image features tend to be biased toward the center of natural images and fixations are correlated with image features. A common alternative explanation is that experiments typically use a central pre-trial fixation marker, and observers tend to make small amplitude saccades. In the present study, the central bias was explored by dividing images post hoc according to biases in their image feature distributions. Central biases could not be explained by motor biases for making small saccades and were found irrespective of the distribution of image features. When the scene appeared, the initial response was to orient to the center of the screen. Following this, fixation distributions did not vary with image feature distributions when freely viewing scenes. When searching the scenes, fixation distributions shifted slightly toward the distribution of features in the image, primarily during the first few fixations after the initial orienting response. The endurance of the central fixation bias irrespective of the distribution of image features, or the observer's task, implies one of three possible explanations: First, the center of the screen may be an optimal location for early information processing of the scene. Second, it may simply be that the center of the screen is a convenient location from which to start oculomotor exploration of the scene. Third, it may be that the central bias reflects a tendency to re-center the eye in its orbit.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Time course of information processing during scene perception: The relationship between saccade amplitude and fixation duration

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Perception
                Perception
                PEC
                sppec
                Perception
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                0301-0066
                1468-4233
                29 September 2022
                November 2022
                : 51
                : 11
                : 763-788
                Affiliations
                [1-03010066221122697]Ringgold 2860, universityDelft University of Technology; , The Netherlands
                Author notes
                [*]Joost C. F. de Winter, Department of Cognitive Robotics, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands. Email: j.c.f.dewinter@ 123456tudelft.nl
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1281-8200
                Article
                10.1177_03010066221122697
                10.1177/03010066221122697
                9557837
                36172741
                0aebec5b-5983-4a8b-8248-58d76a821177
                © The Author(s) 2022

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 3 April 2022
                : 11 August 2022
                Categories
                Articles
                Custom metadata
                ts19

                eye-tracking,painting,rembrandt,salience,texture
                eye-tracking, painting, rembrandt, salience, texture

                Comments

                Comment on this article