7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in children: a systematic review of the literature

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Robotic pyeloplasty has become a natural progression from the development of open, then laparoscopic procedures to treat pediatric patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty (RALP) is now considered a new gold standard in pediatric MIS. A systematic review of the literature retrieved from PubMed and published in the last 10 years (2012–2022) was performed. This review underlines that in all children except the smallest infants, where the open procedure has benefits in terms of duration of general anesthetic and there are limitations in the size of instruments, robotic pyeloplasty is becoming the preferred procedure to perform in patients with UPJO. Results for the robotic approach are extremely promising, with shorter operative times than laparoscopy and equal success rates, length of stay and complications. In case of redo pyeloplasty, RALP is easier to perform than other open or MIS procedures. By 2009, robotic surgery became the most used modality to treat all UPJO and continues to grow in popularity. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children is safe and effective with excellent outcomes, even in redo pyeloplasty or challenging anatomical cases. Moreover, robotic approach shortens the learning curve for junior surgeons, who can readily achieve levels of expertise comparable to senior practitioners. However, there are still concerns regarding the cost associated with this procedure. Further high-quality prospective observational studies and clinical trials, as well as new technologies specific for the pediatric population, are advisable for RALP to reach the level of gold standard.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Comparison of the learning curve and outcomes of robotic assisted pediatric pyeloplasty.

          We compared the learning curve and outcomes in children undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty during the initiation of a robotic surgery program compared to the benchmark of open pyeloplasty. The records of our first consecutive 33 children undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty from 2006 to 2009 were retrospectively reviewed and compared to those of age and gender matched children who underwent open repair done by senior faculty surgeons before the initiation of our robotic surgery program. We compared operative time, complications, postoperative pain, length of stay and surgical success for 2 surgeons who adopted the robotic approach at an academic teaching institution. We found no significant differences in length of stay, pain score or surgical success at a median followup of 16 months. The number of complications was similar and they tended to be early and technical in the robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty group. Overall average operative time was 90 minutes longer (38%) for robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (p <0.004). When evaluated chronologically, there was evidence of a learning curve. After 15 to 20 robotic cases overall operative times for robotic assisted laparoscopic cases was consistently within 1 SD of our average open pyeloplasty time with no significant difference in overall operative time (p = 0.23). Of the decrease in overall operative time 70% was due to decreased pyeloplasty time rather than peripheral time. There was similar safety and efficacy with robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty, although complications tended to be technical and early in our initial experience. Operative time decreased with experience and after 15 to 20 cases it was similar to that of open pyeloplasty with similar outcomes and surgical success. Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Meta-analysis of robot-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in children

            To critically analyse outcomes for robot-assisted pyeloplasty(RAP) vs conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) or open pyeloplasty (OP) by systematic review and meta-analysis of published data.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Long-term experience and outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children and young adults.

              Laparoscopic pyeloplasty is one of the more common robotic assisted procedures performed in children. However, data regarding long-term experience and clinical outcomes for this procedure are limited. We evaluated the long-term outcomes in a large series of patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty at a teaching institution, and the effect of a collaborative program between the robotic surgeons, surgical nurses and anesthesiologists on overall operative time.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ciroespo@unina.it
                Journal
                J Robot Surg
                J Robot Surg
                Journal of Robotic Surgery
                Springer London (London )
                1863-2483
                1863-2491
                13 March 2023
                13 March 2023
                2023
                : 17
                : 4
                : 1239-1246
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.4691.a, ISNI 0000 0001 0790 385X, Department of Translational Medical Sciences (DISMET), Pediatric Surgery Unit, , “Federico II” University of Naples School of Medicine, ; Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
                [2 ]GRID grid.34988.3e, ISNI 0000 0001 1482 2038, Faculty of Computer Science, , Free University of Bolzano, ; Bolzano, Italy
                [3 ]GRID grid.4691.a, ISNI 0000 0001 0790 385X, Internal Medicine Unit, , University of Naples “Federico II”, ; Naples, Italy
                Article
                1559
                10.1007/s11701-023-01559-1
                10374693
                36913057
                0ae56ff7-d89b-4c29-876d-25469c647ff0
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 15 January 2023
                : 1 March 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

                Surgery
                pediatric urology,upjo,robotic pyeloplasty
                Surgery
                pediatric urology, upjo, robotic pyeloplasty

                Comments

                Comment on this article