0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      A blind insertion airway device in dogs as an alternative to traditional endotracheal intubation

      , , ,
      The Veterinary Journal
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Endotracheal intubation is the standard of care to establish a secure airway; however, laryngeal airway management systems are increasingly being used in human patients for elective surgical procedures and in emergency settings. In this study, a double lumen, blind insertion airway device (BIAD) was placed in the esophagus of dogs and evaluated for its ability to ventilate the lungs. Initially, 10 euthanazed dogs were evaluated, followed by a group of 15 mixed breed dogs that were undergoing elective spay or neuter procedures, and a group of 10 healthy dogs. Post-procedure evaluation included visual examination with a laryngoscope to inspect for signs of inflammation or mucosal damage. The device provided adequate ventilation in all subjects; the dogs were under anesthesia or heavily sedated for 10 min to 2 h and recovered uneventfully. No evidence of esophagitis, aspiration pneumonia, tracheitis, subcutaneous emphysema or esophageal laceration was observed. In conclusion, the use of double lumen airway devices warrants further study as an alternative airway management system in dogs.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          The Veterinary Journal
          The Veterinary Journal
          Elsevier BV
          10900233
          February 2015
          February 2015
          : 203
          : 2
          : 187-191
          Article
          10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.12.021
          25599898
          0ae3c822-b077-4c20-b2ce-1253b280e8d5
          © 2015

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article