2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Dysautonomia in COVID-19 Patients: A Narrative Review on Clinical Course, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization sounded the COVID-19 pandemic alarm. While efforts in the first few months focused on reducing the mortality of infected patients, there is increasing data on the effects of long-term infection (Post-COVID-19 condition). Among the different symptoms described after acute infection, those derived from autonomic dysfunction are especially frequent and limiting.

          Objective

          To conduct a narrative review synthesizing current evidence of the signs and symptoms of dysautonomia in patients diagnosed with COVID-19, together with a compilation of available treatment guidelines.

          Results

          Autonomic dysfunction associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection occurs at different temporal stages. Some of the proposed pathophysiological mechanisms include direct tissue damage, immune dysregulation, hormonal disturbances, elevated cytokine levels, and persistent low-grade infection. Acute autonomic dysfunction has a direct impact on the mortality risk, given its repercussions on the respiratory, cardiovascular, and neurological systems. Iatrogenic autonomic dysfunction is a side effect caused by the drugs used and/or admission to the intensive care unit. Finally, late dysautonomia occurs in 2.5% of patients with Post-COVID-19 condition. While orthostatic hypotension and neurally-mediated syncope should be considered, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) appears to be the most common autonomic phenotype among these patients. A review of diagnostic and treatment guidelines focused on each type of dysautonomic condition was done.

          Conclusion

          Symptoms deriving from autonomic dysfunction involvement are common in those affected by COVID-19. These symptoms have a great impact on the quality of life both in the short and medium to long term. A better understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of Post-COVID manifestations that affect the autonomic nervous system, and targeted therapeutic management could help reduce the sequelae of COVID-19, especially if we act in the earliest phases of the disease.

          Related collections

          Most cited references91

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Persistent Symptoms in Patients After Acute COVID-19

          This case series describes COVID-19 symptoms persisting a mean of 60 days after onset among Italian patients previously discharged from COVID-19 hospitalization.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID-19

            Although COVID-19 is most well known for causing substantial respiratory pathology, it can also result in several extrapulmonary manifestations. These conditions include thrombotic complications, myocardial dysfunction and arrhythmia, acute coronary syndromes, acute kidney injury, gastrointestinal symptoms, hepatocellular injury, hyperglycemia and ketosis, neurologic illnesses, ocular symptoms, and dermatologic complications. Given that ACE2, the entry receptor for the causative coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, is expressed in multiple extrapulmonary tissues, direct viral tissue damage is a plausible mechanism of injury. In addition, endothelial damage and thromboinflammation, dysregulation of immune responses, and maladaptation of ACE2-related pathways might all contribute to these extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID-19. Here we review the extrapulmonary organ-specific pathophysiology, presentations and management considerations for patients with COVID-19 to aid clinicians and scientists in recognizing and monitoring the spectrum of manifestations, and in developing research priorities and therapeutic strategies for all organ systems involved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Characterizing long COVID in an international cohort: 7 months of symptoms and their impact

              Background A significant number of patients with COVID-19 experience prolonged symptoms, known as Long COVID. Few systematic studies have investigated this population, particularly in outpatient settings. Hence, relatively little is known about symptom makeup and severity, expected clinical course, impact on daily functioning, and return to baseline health. Methods We conducted an online survey of people with suspected and confirmed COVID-19, distributed via COVID-19 support groups (e.g. Body Politic, Long COVID Support Group, Long Haul COVID Fighters) and social media (e.g. Twitter, Facebook). Data were collected from September 6, 2020 to November 25, 2020. We analyzed responses from 3762 participants with confirmed (diagnostic/antibody positive; 1020) or suspected (diagnostic/antibody negative or untested; 2742) COVID-19, from 56 countries, with illness lasting over 28 days and onset prior to June 2020. We estimated the prevalence of 203 symptoms in 10 organ systems and traced 66 symptoms over seven months. We measured the impact on life, work, and return to baseline health. Findings For the majority of respondents (>91%), the time to recovery exceeded 35 weeks. During their illness, participants experienced an average of 55.9+/- 25.5 (mean+/-STD) symptoms, across an average of 9.1 organ systems. The most frequent symptoms after month 6 were fatigue, post-exertional malaise, and cognitive dysfunction. Symptoms varied in their prevalence over time, and we identified three symptom clusters, each with a characteristic temporal profile. 85.9% of participants (95% CI, 84.8% to 87.0%) experienced relapses, primarily triggered by exercise, physical or mental activity, and stress. 86.7% (85.6% to 92.5%) of unrecovered respondents were experiencing fatigue at the time of survey, compared to 44.7% (38.5% to 50.5%) of recovered respondents. 1700 respondents (45.2%) required a reduced work schedule compared to pre-illness, and an additional 839 (22.3%) were not working at the time of survey due to illness. Cognitive dysfunction or memory issues were common across all age groups (~88%). Except for loss of smell and taste, the prevalence and trajectory of all symptoms were similar between groups with confirmed and suspected COVID-19. Interpretation Patients with Long COVID report prolonged, multisystem involvement and significant disability. By seven months, many patients have not yet recovered (mainly from systemic and neurological/cognitive symptoms), have not returned to previous levels of work, and continue to experience significant symptom burden. Funding All authors contributed to this work in a voluntary capacity. The cost of survey hosting (on Qualtrics) and publication fee was covered by AA's research grant (Wellcome Trust/Gatsby Charity via Sainsbury Wellcome center, UCL).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Neurol
                Front Neurol
                Front. Neurol.
                Frontiers in Neurology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-2295
                27 May 2022
                2022
                27 May 2022
                : 13
                : 886609
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Infectious Disease Service, University Clinic of Navarra , Pamplona, Spain
                [2] 2COVID-19 Department, University Clinic of Navarra , Pamplona, Spain
                [3] 3Immune and Infectious Inflammatory Diseases Research, IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research , Pamplona, Spain
                [4] 4Neurology Department, Donostia University Hospital-OSAKIDETZA , San Sebastián, Spain
                [5] 5ATHENEA Neuroclinics, Policlínica Gipuzkoa Grupo Quironsalud , Donostia, Spain
                [6] 6Neuroscience Area, Biodonostia Research Institute , San Sebastián, Spain
                [7] 7Neurology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Deusto , Bilbao, Spain
                [8] 8Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Institute Carlos III , Madrid, Spain
                [9] 9Neurology Department, Hospital Reina Sofía de Tudela-OSASUNBIDEA , Tudela, Spain
                [10] 10Aragon Institute for Health Research (IIS-A) , Zaragoza, Spain
                [11] 11Neurodegenerative Diseases Group Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute , Barakaldo, Spain
                [12] 12Neurology Department, Cruces University Hospital-OSAKIDETZA , Barakaldo, Spain
                [13] 13Neurology Practice, Polyclinic Mladost 1 , Sofia, Bulgaria
                [14] 14Infectious Disease Department, Donostia University Hospital-OSAKIDETZA , San Sebastián, Spain
                [15] 15Department of Neurosciences, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) , Leioa, Spain
                [16] 16Pulmonary Department, University Clinic of Navarra , Pamplona, Spain
                [17] 17Internal Medicine Department, University Clinic of Navarra , Pamplona, Spain
                [18] 18Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Institute Carlos III , Madrid, Spain
                Author notes

                Edited by: Beatrice Paradiso, Dolo Hospital, Italy

                Reviewed by: Philip L. Mar, Saint Louis University, United States; Anna Hohler, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, United States

                *Correspondence: Ane Mínguez-Olaondo aminguezolaondo@ 123456gmail.com

                This article was submitted to Neuroinfectious Diseases, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology

                †These authors share senior authorship

                Article
                10.3389/fneur.2022.886609
                9198643
                35720084
                0aca1087-5dbc-4ed7-8156-3bd39d046099
                Copyright © 2022 Carmona-Torre, Mínguez-Olaondo, López-Bravo, Tijero, Grozeva, Walcker, Azkune-Galparsoro, López de Munain, Alcaide, Quiroga, del Pozo and Gómez-Esteban.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 28 February 2022
                : 28 March 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 92, Pages: 16, Words: 11310
                Categories
                Neurology
                Review

                Neurology
                dysautonomia,post-covid-19 condition,socioeconomic impact,orthostatic intolerance syndromes,pots,diagnosis,management

                Comments

                Comment on this article