12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Effects of Auxins on PIN-FORMED2 (PIN2) Dynamics Are Not Mediated by Inhibiting PIN2 Endocytosis 1

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Auxins and auxin transport inhibitors affect PIN-FORMED2 (PIN2) dynamics in Arabidopsis epidermal root cells through the synthetic and secretion pathway, but they do not inhibit PIN2 endocytosis.

          Abstract

          By using the photoconvertible fluorescence protein Dendra2 as a tag we demonstrated that neither the naturally occurring auxins indole-3-acetic acid and indole-3-butyric acid, nor the synthetic auxin analogs 1-naphthaleneacetic acid and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid nor compounds inhibiting polar auxin transport such as 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid and 1-N-naphthylphthalamic acid, were able to inhibit endocytosis of the putative auxin transporter PIN-FORMED2 (PIN2) in Arabidopsis ( Arabidopsis thaliana) root epidermis cells. All compounds, except Indole-3-butyric acid, repressed the recovery of the PIN2-Dendra2 plasma membrane pool after photoconversion when they were used in high concentrations. The synthetic auxin analogs 1-naphthaleneacetic acid and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid showed the strongest inhibition. Auxins and auxin transport inhibitors suppressed also the accumulation of both newly synthesized and endocytotic PIN2 pools in Brefeldin A compartments (BFACs). Furthermore, we demonstrated that all compounds are also interfering with BFAC formation. The synthetic auxin analogs caused the highest reduction in the number and size of BFACs. We concluded that auxins and inhibitors of auxin transport do affect PIN2 turnover in the cells, but it is through the synthetic rather than the endocytotic pathway. The study also confirmed inappropriateness of the BFA-based approach to study PIN2 endocytosis because the majority of PIN2 accumulating in BFACs is newly synthesized and not derived from the plasma membrane.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Plant Physiol
          Plant Physiol
          plantphysiol
          aspb
          Plant Physiology
          American Society of Plant Biologists
          0032-0889
          1532-2548
          October 2016
          09 August 2016
          : 172
          : 2
          : 1019-1031
          Affiliations
          [1]Comenius University Science Park, Comenius University, 841 04 Bratislava, Slovakia (J.J., B.B., S.S., K.M., J.T.); Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 845 23 Bratislava (J.J.); Department of Molecular Biology, Comenius University, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Mlynská dolina, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia (S.S., J.T.); Department of Botany, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, 811 02 Bratislava, Slovakia (K.M.); and Central Microscopy, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 508 29 Cologne, Germany (E.S.)
          Author notes
          [1]

          This publication is the result of the Comenius University Science Park 2-Phase Implementation, as supported by the Research & Innovation Operational Programme, which is funded by the European Regional Development Fund.

          [* ]Address correspondence to jan.jasik@ 123456rec.uniba.sk .

          The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors ( www.plantphysiol.org) is: Ján Jásik ( jan.jasik@ 123456rec.uniba.sk ).

          J.J. designed the research, performed most of the experiments, analyzed and interpreted data, and wrote the article; B.B. evaluated the images, performed root-growth assay, and contributed to the preparation of the figures; J.T., K.M., S.S., E.S., and J.J. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; J.T., S.S., and K.M. supervised the project; E.S. edited the article; and all authors discussed the results and commented on the article.

          Article
          PMC5047079 PMC5047079 5047079 PP201600563R2
          10.1104/pp.16.00563
          5047079
          27506239
          0ac3634f-0c67-4f44-856f-69c2b4bef93d
          © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved.

          Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at www.plantphysiol.org/site/license.

          History
          : 12 April 2016
          : 04 August 2016
          Page count
          Figures: 9, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 51, Pages: 13
          Categories
          Articles
          Cell Biology
          Custom metadata
          v1

          Comments

          Comment on this article