25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sex and Gender Differences Research Design for Basic, Clinical, and Population Studies: Essentials for Investigators

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A sex- and gender-informed perspective increases rigor, promotes discovery, and expands the relevance of biomedical research. In the current era of accountability to present data for males and females, thoughtful and deliberate methodology can improve study design and inference in sex and gender differences research. We address issues of motivation, subject selection, sample size, data collection, analysis, and interpretation, considering implications for basic, clinical, and population research. In particular, we focus on methods to test sex/gender differences as effect modification or interaction, and discuss why some inferences from sex-stratified data should be viewed with caution. Without careful methodology, the pursuit of sex difference research, despite a mandate from funding agencies, will result in a literature of contradiction. However, given the historic lack of attention to sex differences, the absence of evidence for sex differences is not necessarily evidence of the absence of sex differences. Thoughtfully conceived and conducted sex and gender differences research is needed to drive scientific and therapeutic discovery for all sexes and genders.

          Abstract

          A review of study motivation, subject selection, sample size, data collection, analysis, and interpretation in sex and gender differences research for basic, clinical, and population studies is provided.

          Related collections

          Most cited references82

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Gene action in the X-chromosome of the mouse (Mus musculus L.).

          MARY LYON (1961)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sex differences in trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder: a quantitative review of 25 years of research.

            Meta-analyses of studies yielding sex-specific risk of potentially traumatic events (PTEs) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) indicated that female participants were more likely than male participants to meet criteria for PTSD, although they were less likely to experience PTEs. Female participants were more likely than male participants to experience sexual assault and child sexual abuse, but less likely to experience accidents, nonsexual assaults, witnessing death or injury, disaster or fire, and combat or war. Among victims of specific PTEs (excluding sexual assault or abuse), female participants exhibited greater PTSD. Thus, sex differences in risk of exposure to particular types of PTE can only partially account for the differential PTSD risk in male and female participants. (c) 2006 APA, All Rights Reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Estrogen receptors: how do they signal and what are their targets.

              During the past decade there has been a substantial advance in our understanding of estrogen signaling both from a clinical as well as a preclinical perspective. Estrogen signaling is a balance between two opposing forces in the form of two distinct receptors (ER alpha and ER beta) and their splice variants. The prospect that these two pathways can be selectively stimulated or inhibited with subtype-selective drugs constitutes new and promising therapeutic opportunities in clinical areas as diverse as hormone replacement, autoimmune diseases, prostate and breast cancer, and depression. Molecular biological, biochemical, and structural studies have generated information which is invaluable for the development of more selective and effective ER ligands. We have also become aware that ERs do not function by themselves but require a number of coregulatory proteins whose cell-specific expression explains some of the distinct cellular actions of estrogen. Estrogen is an important morphogen, and many of its proliferative effects on the epithelial compartment of glands are mediated by growth factors secreted from the stromal compartment. Thus understanding the cross-talk between growth factor and estrogen signaling is essential for understanding both normal and malignant growth. In this review we focus on several of the interesting recent discoveries concerning estrogen receptors, on estrogen as a morphogen, and on the molecular mechanisms of anti-estrogen signaling.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Endocr Rev
                Endocr. Rev
                edrv
                Endocrine Reviews
                Endocrine Society (Washington, DC )
                0163-769X
                1945-7189
                August 2018
                12 April 2018
                12 April 2018
                : 39
                : 4
                : 424-439
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Women’s Health, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
                [2 ]Connors Center for Women’s Health and Gender Biology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
                [3 ]Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
                [4 ]Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
                [5 ]Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
                [6 ]Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
                [7 ]Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
                [8 ]Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
                [9 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
                Author notes
                Correspondence and Reprint Requests:  Janet W. Rich-Edwards, PhD, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02120. E-mail: jr33@ 123456partners.org .
                Article
                edrv_201700246
                10.1210/er.2017-00246
                7263836
                29668873
                0a9c8018-214b-487b-9a6d-5b5fba604ff5
                Copyright © 2018 Endocrine Society

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 20 November 2017
                : 09 April 2018
                Page count
                Pages: 16
                Funding
                Funded by: NIH, DOI 10.13039/100000002;
                Categories
                Reviews
                Reproductive Biology and Sex-Based Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article