2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Online Collaborative Documents as Media Logic: The Mediatization of Risk Response in the Post-pandemic Era

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Online collaborative documents (OCDs) have previously been the focus of office efficiency, but today they can be a special approach to risk response in public health and natural disaster situations. Studying the mediatization of the risk response by OCDs can help us understand the interaction between digital technologies, online users, and emotions in a post-pandemic world. A mixed-method design involving online ethnography and focus groups was employed to discuss OCD performance during the 2021 Henan flood. The empirical results indicate that four dimensions of technological affordances (i.e., editability, accessibility, activability, and normability) connected the functional features of the digital platform with users’ potential actions. Risk communication as a contextual element of media exposure and discursive practice provided a participatory and constructive framework for users’ gathering. Therefore, affective ties including anxiety, fear, and encouragement supported the affective publics’ mass deliberation and social mobilization. These findings provide an institutional lens for mediatization research to view OCD as media logic and reveal some methods that can be referred to for risk management and humanistic concerns globally.

          Related collections

          Most cited references106

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Perception of risk

          P Slovic (1987)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: the example of vaccination.

            Risk perceptions are central to many health behavior theories. However, the relationship between risk perceptions and behavior, muddied by instances of inappropriate assessment and analysis, often looks weak. A meta-analysis of eligible studies assessing the bivariate association between adult vaccination and perceived likelihood, susceptibility, or severity was conducted. Thirty-four studies met inclusion criteria (N = 15,988). Risk likelihood (pooled r = .26), susceptibility (pooled r = .24), and severity (pooled r = .16) significantly predicted vaccination behavior. The risk perception-behavior relationship was larger for studies that were prospective, had higher quality risk measures, or had unskewed risk or behavior measures. The consistent relationships between risk perceptions and behavior, larger than suggested by prior meta-analyses, suggest that risk perceptions are rightly placed as core concepts in theories of health behavior. (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies

              Leonardi (2011)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                23 June 2022
                2022
                : 13
                : 892569
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Institute of Journalism and Communication, Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences , Chengdu, China
                [2] 2School of Communication and Design, Sun Yat-sen University , Guangzhou, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Runxi Zeng, Chongqing University, China

                Reviewed by: Simone Belli, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain; Yufan Sunny Qin, University of Florida, United States; Qing Huang, Zhejiang University, China; Ştefan Vlăduţescu, University of Craiova, Romania; Yuan Wang, University of Maryland, College Park, United States

                *Correspondence: Hao Jiang, jiangh67@ 123456mail3.sysu.edu.cn

                This article was submitted to Health Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2022.892569
                9260903
                35814134
                0a5f565e-2cfc-49e5-830c-bc10841e07d5
                Copyright © 2022 Jiang, Zhang, Guo, Cheng and Peng.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 09 March 2022
                : 25 May 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 116, Pages: 16, Words: 13613
                Funding
                Funded by: National Social Science Fund, doi 10.13039/501100012325;
                Award ID: 21XXW003
                Funded by: Sixth Academic Innovation Program of the Graduate School of Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                online collaborative documents,mediatization,technological affordances,risk communication,affective publics

                Comments

                Comment on this article