15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      The Role of a Change Heuristic in Judgments of Sound Intensity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Leboe and Mondor (2008) demonstrated that participants will apply a change heuristic when making duration judgments. In this study we investigated whether participants would apply this same change heuristic when making judgments about the perceived intensity of a sound. In two experiments, participants were presented with two consecutive sounds on each of a series of trials and their task was to judge whether the second sound was louder or quieter than the first. In Experiment 1, participants were more likely to judge sounds that increased in frequency as louder in intensity than sounds that maintained a constant frequency. In Experiment 2, participants were more likely to judge sounds that either increased or decreased in frequency as louder in intensity than sounds that maintained a constant frequency. We interpret these results as evidence that reliance on a change heuristic leads to the illusion of increased intensity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          On cross-modal similarity: the perceptual structure of pitch, loudness, and brightness.

          Examined how pitch and loudness correspond to brightness. In the Experiment 1, 16 Ss identified which of 2 lights more resembled each of 16 tones; in Experiment 2, 8 of the same 16 Ss rated the similarity of lights to lights, tones to tones, and lights to tones. (1) Pitch and loudness both contributed to cross-modal similarity, but for most Ss pitch contributed more. (2) Individuals differed as to whether pitch or loudness contributed more; these differences were consistent across matching and similarity scaling. (3) Cross-modal similarity depended largely on relative stimulus values. (4) Multidimensional scaling revealed 2 perceptual dimensions, loudness and pitch, with brightness common to both. A simple quantitative model can describe the cross-modal comparisons, compatible with the view that perceptual similarity may be characterized through a malleable spatial representation that is multimodal as well as multidimensional.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Perceptual primacy of dimensions: support for a model of dimensional interaction.

            Do Ss always process multidimensional stimuli according to psychologically primary dimensions? Our hypothesis is that they do: Primary dimensions provide one component of a new model of dimensional interaction, a model that distinguishes information processed at the level of attributes from information processed at the level of the stimulus. By using sound stimuli created from the dimensions pitch-loudness (Experiments 1 and 2), pitch-timbre (Experiment 3), and loudness-timbre (Experiment 4), we tested performance in selective- and divided-attention tasks at each of three orientations of axes: 0 degrees, 22.5 degrees, and 45 degrees. Each experiment revealed strong evidence of primacy: As axes rotated from 0 degrees to 45 degrees, selective attention deteriorated, but divided attention improved, producing a distinct pattern of convergence. Each experiment also revealed effects of congruity: Attributes from corresponding poles of a dimension (e.g., high pitch and loud) were classified faster than those from noncorresponding poles. The results fit well with our new conception but are inconsistent with other current models of dimensional interaction.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The distinction between integral and separable dimensions: evidence for the integrality of pitch and loudness.

              Six experiments are reported that investigated the reality and generality of dimensional integrality (Garner, 1974a) by evaluating whether the auditory dimensions of pitch and loudness are psychologically privileged and whether they combine in an integral fashion. In Experiment 1 we psychophysically scaled the dimensions to ensure that, within the stimulus range used, the perceived value on each dimension would remain constant in the face of variation on the other dimension. In Experiments 2 through 4 we assessed performance by using the converging operations by which Garner defined integrality and separability. Experiment 2 showed that in speeded classification, pitch and loudness lead to facilitation with redundant variation and interference with orthogonal variation. Experiment 3 showed that unspeeded classifications are guided predominantly by overall similarity. Experiment 4 established that the better-fitting metric by which multidimensional similarity is appreciated is Euclidean rather than city block. These results suggest that the dimensions of pitch and loudness combine in an integral fashion. In Experiments 5 and 6 we investigated whether the dimensions of pitch and loudness have a privileged status by assessing the impact of rotating the dimensional axes on performance in a speeded sorting task. Experiment 5 looked at six alternative dimensional orientations to pitch and loudness. If anything, rotating the dimensional axes increased the amount of interference in filtering. In Experiment 6 we assessed an alternative dimensional description of the stimuli based on the dimensions of volume and brightness. We found greater interference when the stimuli varied along the dimensions of volume and brightness than when they varied along the dimensions of pitch and loudness. The fact that the least interference is observed when the stimuli vary along the dimensions of pitch and loudness suggests that these dimensions are the more psychologically valid ones. These findings indicate that integrality is not a "myth," that is, merely a case of psychophysical mismatch. Instead, dimensions that are psychologically real are sometimes processed in a unitary fashion.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                zea
                Experimental Psychology
                Hogrefe Publishing
                1618-3169
                December 2009
                2010
                : 57
                : 5
                : 398-404
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
                Author notes
                Launa C. Leboe, P238 Duff Roblin Bldg., Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada, +204 474 7326, +204 474 7599, leboe@ 123456cc.umanitoba.ca
                Article
                zea_57_5_398
                10.1027/1618-3169/a000048
                20178937
                09eb02a1-9224-44b0-9cf4-074902e7d685
                Copyright @ 2009
                History
                : March 19, 2009
                : June 10, 2009
                : July 14, 2009
                Categories
                Research Article

                Psychology,General behavioral science
                perceived intensity,heuristics,auditory illusions
                Psychology, General behavioral science
                perceived intensity, heuristics, auditory illusions

                Comments

                Comment on this article