9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Theoretical aspects of the CEBAF 89-009 experiment on inclusive scattering of 4.05 GeV electrons from nuclei

      Preprint
      ,

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We compare recent CEBAF data on inclusive electron scattering on nuclei with predictions, based on a relation between structure functions (SF) of a nucleus, a nucleon and a nucleus of point-nucleons. The latter contains nuclear dynamics, e.g. binary collision contributions in addition to the asymptotic limit. The agreement with the data is good, except in low-intensity regions. Computed ternary collsion contributions appear too small for an explanation. We perform scaling analyses in Gurvitz's scaling variable and found that for \(y_G\gtrless 0\), ratios of scaling functions for pairs of nuclei differ by less than 15-20% from 1. Scaling functions for \(<y_G>0\) are, for increasing \(Q^2\), shown to approach a plateau from above. We observe only weak \(Q^2\)-dependence in FSI, which in the relevant kinematic region is ascribed to the diffractive nature of the NN amplitudes appearing in FSI. This renders it difficult to separate asymptotic from FSI parts and seriously hampers the extraction of \(n(p)\) from scaling analyses in a model-independnent fashion.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          12 April 1999
          Article
          10.1103/PhysRevC.60.044601
          nucl-th/9904028
          09dea00b-7249-4110-b8a8-782f55f12dd5
          History
          Custom metadata
          WIS-99/12 Mar-DPP
          Phys.Rev. C60 (1999) 044601
          11 p. Latex file, 2 ps figs
          nucl-th

          Nuclear physics
          Nuclear physics

          Comments

          Comment on this article