Cystic fibrosis–related diabetes (CFRD) is the most common comorbidity in people with
cystic fibrosis (CF), occurring in ∼20% of adolescents and 40–50% of adults (1). While
it shares features of type 1 and type 2 diabetes, CFRD is a distinct clinical entity.
It is primarily caused by insulin insufficiency, although fluctuating levels of insulin
resistance related to acute and chronic illness also play a role. The additional diagnosis
of CFRD has a negative impact on pulmonary function and survival in CF, and this risk
disproportionately affects women (2
–4). In contrast to patients with other types of diabetes, there are no documented
cases of death from atherosclerotic vascular disease in patients with CFRD, despite
the fact that some now live into their sixth and seventh decades.
These guidelines are the result of a joint effort between the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
(CFF), the American Diabetes Association (ADA), and the Pediatric Endocrine Society
(PES). They are intended for use by CF patients, their care partners, and health care
professionals and include recommendations for screening, diagnosis, and medical management
of CFRD. This report focuses on aspects of care unique to CFRD. A comprehensive summary
of recommendations for all people with diabetes can be found in the ADA Standards
of Medical Care, published annually in the January supplement to Diabetes Care (5).
METHODS
In 2009, CFF in collaboration with ADA and PES convened a committee of CF and diabetes
experts to update clinical care guidelines for CFRD. Investigators at Johns Hopkins
University conducted evidence reviews on relevant clinical questions identified by
the guidelines committee. The reviews were provided to the committee to use in developing
recommendations. Where possible, the evidence for each recommendation was considered
and graded by the committee using the ADA (5) and the U.S. Preventive Services Task
Force (USPSTF) (6) grading systems (Table 1). Recommendations from existing published
guidelines were used when available and appropriate, and these are indicated as consensus
statements. The committee also made consensus recommendations for topics not included
in the evidence reviews or for which limited evidence was available in the literature.
Recommendations will be updated as warranted by new evidence, and the guidelines will
be reviewed 3 years after release date to determine if an update is needed. A summary
of the committee's recommendations is presented in Table 2.
Table 1
Evidence-grading system for clinical practice recommendations
ADA classification system
Level of evidence
Description
A
Clear evidence from well-conducted, generalizable, randomized, controlled trials that
are adequately powered, including
Evidence from a well-conducted multicenter trial
Evidence from a meta-analysis that incorporated quality ratings in the analysis
Compelling nonexperimental evidence, i.e., “all-or-none” rule developed by the Centre
for Evidence-Based Medicine at Oxford
Supportive evidence from well-conducted, randomized, controlled trials that are adequately
powered, including
Evidence from a well-conducted trial at one or more institutions
Evidence from a meta-analysis that incorporated quality ratings in the analysis
B
Supportive evidence from well-conducted cohort studies, including
Evidence from a well-conducted prospective cohort study or registry
Evidence from a well-conducted meta-analysis of cohort studies
Supportive evidence from a well-conducted case-control study
C
Supportive evidence from poorly controlled or uncontrolled studies, including
Evidence from randomized clinical trials with one or more major or three or more minor
methodological flaws that could invalidate the results
Evidence from observational studies with high potential for bias (such as case series
with comparison with historical controls)
Conflicting evidence with the weight of evidence supporting the recommendation
E
Expert consensus or clinical experience
USPSTF recommendation classification system
Estimate of effect
Quality of evidence
Substantial
Moderate
Small
Zero/negative*
High
A
B
C
D
Moderate
B
B
C
D
Low
Insufficient (I)
*A study with significant findings against something is given a grade of D.
Table 2
Summary of recommendations for the clinical care of CFRD
Screening recommendations
The use of A1C as a screening test for CFRD is not recommended. (ADA-B; USPSTF-D)
Screening for CFRD should be performed using a 2-h 75-g OGTT. (ADA-E; Consensus)
Annual screening for CFRD should begin by age 10 years in all CF patient s who do
not have CFRD. (ADA B; USPSTF-B)
CF patients with acute pulmonary exacerbation requiring intravenous antibiotics and/or
systemic glucocorticoids should be screened for CFRD by monitoring fasting and 2-h
postprandial plasma glucose levels for the first 48 h. If elevated blood glucose levels
are found by SMBG, the results must be confirmed by a certified laboratory. (ADA-E;
Consensus)
Screening for CFRD by measuring mid- and immediate postfeeding plasma glucose levels
is recommended for CF patients on continuous enteral feedings, at the time of gastrostomy
feeding initiation and then monthly by SMBG. Elevated glucose levels detected by SMBG
must be confirmed by a certified laboratory. (ADA-E; Consensus)
Women with CF who are planning a pregnancy or confirmed pregnant should be screened
for preexisting CFRD with a 2-h 75-g fasting OGTT if they have not had a normal CFRD
screen in the last 6 months. (ADA-E; Consensus)
Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus is recommended at both 12–16 weeks' and
24–28 weeks' gestation in pregnant women with CF not known to have CFRD, using a 2-h
75-g OGTT with blood glucose measures at 0, 1, and 2 h. (ADA-E; Consensus)
Screening for CFRD using a 2-h 75-g fasting OGTT is recommended 6–12 weeks after the
end of the pregnancy in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (diabetes first diagnosed
during pregnancy). (ADA-E; Consensus)
CF patients not known to have diabetes who are undergoing any transplantation procedure
should be screened preoperatively by OGTT if they have not had CFRD screening in the
last 6 months. Plasma glucose levels should be monitored closely in the perioperative
critical care period and until hospital discharge. Screening guidelines for patients
who do not meet diagnostic criteria for CFRD at the time of hospital discharge are
the same as for other CF patients. (ADA-E; Consensus)
Diagnosis recommendations
During a period of stable baseline health the diagnosis of CFRD can be made in CF
patients according to standard ADA criteria. Testing should be done on 2 separate
days to rule out laboratory error unless there are unequivocal symptoms of hyperglycemia
(polyuria and polydipsia); a positive FPG or A1C can be used as a confirmatory test,
but if it is normal the OGTT should be performed or repeated. If the diagnosis of
diabetes is not confirmed, the patient resumes routine annual testing. (ADA-E; Consensus)
2-h OGTT plasma glucose ≥200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l)
FPG ≥126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l)
A1C ≥ 6.5% (A1C <6.5% does not rule out CFRD because this value is often spuriously
low in CF.)
Classical symptoms of diabetes (polyuria and polydipsia) in the presence of a casual
glucose level ≥200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l)
The diagnosis of CFRD can be made in CF patients with acute illness (intravenous antibiotics
in the hospital or at home, systemic glucocorticoid therapy) when FPG levels ≥126
mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l) or 2-h postprandial plasma glucose levels ≥200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l)
persist for more than 48 h. (ADA-E; Consensus)
The diagnosis of CFRD can be made in CF patients on enteral continuous drip feedings
when mid- or postfeeding plasma glucose levels exceed 200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l) on 2
separate days. (ADA-E; Consensus)
Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus should be made based on the recommendations
of the IADPSG (45) where diabetes is diagnosed based on 0-, 1-, and 2-h glucose levels
with a 75-g OGTT if any one of the following is present:
FPG ≥92 mg/dl (5.1 mmol/l)
1-h plasma glucose ≥180 mg/dl (10.0 mmol/l)
2-h plasma glucose ≥153 mg/dl (8.5 mmol/l) (ADA-E; Consensus)
CF patients with gestational diabetes mellitus are not considered to have CFRD, but
require CFRD screening 6–12 weeks after the end of the pregnancy. (ADA-E; Consensus)
Distinguishing between CFRD with and without FH is not necessary. (ADA-B, USPSTF-D)
The onset of CFRD should be defined as the date a person with CF first meets diagnostic
criteria, even if hyperglycemia subsequently abates. (ADA-E; Consensus)
Management recommendations
Patients with CFRD should ideally be seen quarterly by a specialized multidisciplinary
team with expertise in diabetes and CF. (ADA-E; Consensus)
Patients with CFRD should receive ongoing diabetes self-management education from
diabetes education programs that meet national standards for DSME. (ADA-E; Consensus)
Patients with CFRD should be treated with insulin therapy. (ADA-A; USPSTF-B)
Oral diabetes agents are not as effective as insulin in improving nutritional and
metabolic outcomes in CFRD and are not recommended outside the context of clinical
research trials. (ADA-A; USPSTF-D)
Patients with CFRD who are on insulin should perform SMBG at least three times a day.
(ADA-E; Consensus)
Patients with CFRD should strive to attain plasma glucose goals as per the ADA recommendations
for all people with diabetes, bearing in mind that higher or lower goals may be indicated
for some patients and that individualization is important. (ADA-E; Consensus)
A1C measurement is recommended quarterly for patients with CFRD. (ADA-E; Consensus)
For many patients with CFRD, A1C treatment goal is <7%, bearing in mind that higher
or lower goals may be indicated for some patients and that individualization is important.
(ADA-B; USPSTF-B)
CFF evidence-based guidelines for nutritional management are recommended for patients
with CFRD. (ADA-E; Consensus)
Patients with CFRD should be advised to do moderate aerobic exercise for at least
150 min per week. (ADA-E; Consensus)
Diabetes complications recommendations
Education about the symptoms, prevention, and treatment of hypoglycemia, including
the use of glucagon, is recommended for patients with CFRD and their care partners.
(ADA-E; Consensus)
Patients with CFRD should have their blood pressure measured at every routine diabetes
visit as per ADA guidelines. Patients found to have systolic blood pressure ≥130 mmHg
or diastolic blood pressure ≥80 mmHg or >90th percentile for age and sex for pediatric
patients should have repeat measurement on a separate day to confirm a diagnosis of
hypertension. (ADA-E; Consensus)
Annual monitoring for microvascular complications of diabetes is recommended using
ADA guidelines, beginning 5 years after the diagnosis of CFRD or, if the exact time
of diagnosis is not known, at the time that FH is first diagnosed. (ADA-E; Consensus)
Patients with CFRD diagnosed with hypertension or microvascular complications should
receive treatment as recommended by ADA for all people with diabetes, except that
there is no restriction of sodium and, in general, no protein restriction. (ADA-E;
Consensus)
An annual lipid profile is recommended for patients with CFRD and pancreatic exocrine
sufficiency or if any of the following risk factors are present: obesity, family history
of coronary artery disease, or immunosuppressive therapy following transplantation.
(ADA-E; Consensus)
SCREENING
CFRD is often clinically silent. In other populations, the primary consequences of
unrecognized diabetes are macrovascular and microvascular disease. In CF, the nutritional
and pulmonary consequences of diabetes are of greater concern. CFRD is associated
with weight loss, protein catabolism, lung function decline, and increased mortality
(2,3,7
–17), and thus regular screening is warranted.
Screening tests for CFRD
Although hemoglobin A1C (A1C) may become the standard screening test for type 2 diabetes
(5), the committee concluded that it is not sufficiently sensitive for diagnosis of
CFRD and thus should not be used as a screening test. Eight studies were identified
that assessed A1C as a screening test in this population (7,18
–24). The authors of one prospective cohort study of 62 participants with CF and 107
healthy control subjects reported that A1C levels were higher in the CF group than
among the control subjects, leading them to suggest that the use of A1C was appropriate
(18). However, six studies (including two prospective cohort studies [7,21], two cross-sectional
studies [19,20], one case-control study [23], and one case series [22[) with a total
of 477 participants demonstrated low degrees of correlation between A1C and glucose
tolerance status (7,19
–23). Additionally, a cross-sectional study of 191 participants with CF demonstrated
a low positive predictive value of the A1C test (24).
Use of A1C as a screening test for CFRD is not recommended. (ADA-B; USPSTF-D)
Fructosamine, urine glucose, and random glucose levels have low sensitivity in the
CF population (20,23,25). Continuous glucose monitoring is not recommended as a screening
tool because intermittent hyperglycemia detected in this fashion is not diagnostic
for diabetes and there are no outcome data to determine its clinical significance.
Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) identifies patients with CFRD with but not those without
fasting hyperglycemia (FH), and thus this test will miss the diagnosis of diabetes
in approximately half of CF patients (1). Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG)
with home meters is also not sufficiently accurate to screen for CFRD given that the
International Organization for Standardization only requires that 95% of readings
be within 20% of the actual glucose level (26).
Because of the poor performance of A1C and other tests, the oral glucose tolerance
test (OGTT) is the screening test of choice for CFRD. Although it is an imperfect
test due to the inherent variability of the test and the variability observed in individual
CF patients over time, longitudinal studies demonstrate that a diabetes diagnosis
by OGTT correlates with clinically important CF outcomes including the rate of lung
function decline over the next 4 years (12), the risk of microvascular complications
(27), and the risk of early death (1,2). In a multicenter, multinational study, the
OGTT identified patients who benefited from insulin therapy (28).
The OGTT should be performed in the morning during a period of stable baseline health
(at least 6 weeks since an acute exacerbation) using the World Health Organization
protocol (5). Patients fast for at least 8 h (water is permitted) and should consume
a minimum of 150 g (600 kcal) of carbohydrate per day for the preceding 3 days (generally
not an issue because CF patients have high-calorie diets). The patient drinks a standard
beverage containing 1.75 g/kg glucose (maximum 75 g) dissolved in water and sits or
lies quietly for 2 h. Glucose levels are measured at baseline and 2 h. Unless the
patient is experiencing classical symptoms of polyuria and polydipsia in the presence
of a glucose level >200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l) or has two more diagnostic criteria for
diabetes (such as both fasting and 2-h glucose elevation or a diabetes pattern on
OGTT in the presence of an A1C level >6.5%), the test should be confirmed by repeat
testing.
Screening for CFRD should be performed using the 2-h 75-g OGTT. (ADA-E; Consensus)
The age of screening for CFRD
Three studies with a total of 811 participants were identified that provided information
about the appropriate age at which to start screening for CFRD (1,21,24). These studies—a
retrospective cohort study (1), a prospective cohort study (21), and a cross-sectional
study (24)—reported a significantly higher prevalence and incidence of CFRD beyond
the first decade of life. Screening included both pancreatic sufficient and insufficient
patients. The committee concluded that these findings suggest that annual screening
for CFRD should start by age 10 years in all CF patients. Because clinical deterioration
in nutritional and pulmonary status begins 6–24 months prior to a diagnosis of CFRD
(29,30), early detection by annual screening is warranted.
Annual screening for CFRD should begin by age 10 years in all CF patients who do not
have CFRD. (ADA-B; USPSTF-B)
Screening of CF patients during acute illness
CF patients experience frequent pulmonary exacerbations, some of which require treatment
either in the hospital or at home with intravenous antibiotics. Treatment at times
includes systemic glucocorticoids. In clinical experience, hyperglycemia that develops
during acute illness occasionally resolves after a day or two of medical therapy,
but usually lasts for at least 2–6 weeks. CF patients are frequently ill, and hyperglycemia
returns with each subsequent bout of illness, often several times a year. Insulin
deficiency and insulin resistance generally progress over time. Long-term microvascular
(27) and pulmonary (1,2) outcomes correlate with duration of CFRD first diagnosed
during acute illness, even with intervening periods of normal or impaired glucose
tolerance (IGT).
During acute illness and/or a pulse of systemic glucocorticoid therapy, glucose levels
should be monitored for at least the first 48 h, preferably fasting and 2 h postprandially.
If glucose levels do not meet diagnostic criteria for CFRD, testing can be discontinued
after 48 h. For patients receiving therapy at home, SMBG can be performed. However,
SMBG levels are not sufficiently accurate to make a diagnosis of CFRD, and hyperglycemia
should be confirmed by laboratory plasma glucose measurement.
CF patients with acute pulmonary exacerbation requiring intravenous antibiotics and/or
systemic glucocorticoids should be screened for CFRD by monitoring fasting and 2-h
postprandial plasma glucose levels for the first 48 h. If elevated blood glucose levels
are found by SMBG, the results must be confirmed by a certified laboratory. (ADA-E;
Consensus)
Screening of CF patients during continuous drip enteral feedings
Supplemental continuous drip feedings are commonly prescribed for malnourished CF
patients. Although there are few data available specific to this situation, mid-feeding
hyperglycemia may compromise efforts to gain weight. The Committee felt that glucose
levels in the middle and immediately after the gastrostomy tube feeding should be
measured in the hospital and at these same time points once a month at home using
SMBG. SMBG levels are not sufficiently accurate to make a diagnosis of CFRD, and hyperglycemia
detected by SMBG should be confirmed by laboratory plasma glucose measurement.
Screening for CFRD by measuring mid- and immediate postfeeding plasma glucose levels
is recommended for CF patients on continuous enteral feedings, at the time of gastrostomy
tube feeding initiation and then monthly at home. Elevated glucose levels detected
by SMBG must be confirmed by a certified laboratory. (ADA-E; Consensus)
Screening CF patients who are pregnant or planning a pregnancy
Pregnancy is a state of marked insulin resistance, and many women with CF cannot produce
the extra insulin required to meet this demand (31
–33). In addition to the usual concerns about the effect of hyperglycemia on the fetus,
diabetes can exacerbate the difficulties many women with CF have in achieving a positive
protein balance and sufficient weight gain during pregnancy (32).
Women with CF not known to have CFRD who are contemplating pregnancy should be evaluated
prior to conception to rule out preexisting CFRD or be tested immediately upon confirmation
of the pregnancy if they have not had an OGTT in the previous 6 months. Because women
with CF are at high risk for development of hyperglycemia during pregnancy (gestational
diabetes mellitus), the 2-h 75-g OGTT should be performed at the end of both the first
and second trimesters.
Women with CF who are planning a pregnancy or confirmed pregnant should be screened
for preexisting CFRD with a 2-h 75-g fasting OGTT if they have not had a normal CFRD
screen in the last 6 months. (ADA-E; Consensus)
Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus is recommended at both 12–16 weeks' and
24–28 weeks' gestation in pregnant women with CF not known to have CFRD, using a 2-h
75-g OGTT with blood glucose measures at 0, 1, and 2 h. (ADA-E; Consensus)
Screening for CFRD using a 2-h 75-g fasting OGTT is recommended 6–12 weeks after the
end of the pregnancy in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (diabetes first diagnosed
during pregnancy). (ADA-E; Consensus)
Screening CF patients undergoing transplantation
There is an almost universal requirement for insulin in the immediate critical care
postoperative period in CF patients undergoing transplantation procedures, and many
have long-term insulin requirements after transplantation (34
–36). A diagnosis of CFRD prior to transplantation may increase complications of surgery
and has a negative impact on survival, at least in the early postoperative period
when infection, bleeding, and multiorgan failure are the most common causes of death
(34,37). Aggressive management may have a positive impact on outcomes (35).
CF patients not known to have diabetes who are undergoing any transplantation procedure
should be screened preoperatively by OGTT if they have not had CFRD screening in the
last 6 months. Plasma glucose levels should be monitored closely in the perioperative
critical care period and until hospital discharge. Screening guidelines for patients
who do not meet diagnostic criteria for CFRD at the time of hospital discharge are
the same as for other CF patients. (ADA-E; Consensus)
DIAGNOSIS (Fig. 1)
Figure 1
Criteria for the diagnosis of CFRD under different conditions.
The spectrum of glucose tolerance abnormalities in CF
Diabetes is part of a continuum of glucose tolerance abnormalities defined by ADA
(supplementary Table 1, available at http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/content/full/dc10-1768/DC1).
Few CF patients have truly “normal” glucose tolerance. Many patients with normal fasting
and 2-h glucose levels have elevation in the middle of the OGTT (indeterminate glycemia
[INDET]) or when assessed randomly or by continuous glucose monitoring. Impaired fasting
glucose (IFG) (100–125 mg/dl [5.6–6.9 mmol/l[) may also be present (20,38). The clinical
significance of IFG or INDET in CF is not known. In the general population, they are
considered pre-diabetic conditions, associated with a high risk of future development
of diabetes (39). In prepubertal children with CF both IGT and INDET are associated
with early-onset CFRD (40).
Criteria for the diagnosis of CFRD in stable outpatients
ADA has established diagnostic criteria for diabetes that include specific fasting
glucose levels, 2-h OGTT glucose levels (5), and A1C levels. They are based on the
population risk of microvascular disease, and patients with CF are also at risk for
these complications (27,41
–43). The committee questioned whether the diagnostic thresholds should be lower for
the CF population as CFRD is known to have a negative impact on CF pulmonary status
(2,10,11), given that pulmonary disease is the chief morbidity in CFRD. Even less
severe glucose tolerance abnormalities such as IGT are associated with lung function
decline (12,17). However, sufficient outcome-based data are not available at present
to determine whether more stringent diagnostic glucose thresholds more appropriately
reflect risk for the CF population.
During a period of stable baseline health, the diagnosis of CFRD can be made in CF
patients according to standard ADA criteria. Testing should be done on two separate
days to rule out laboratory error unless there are unequivocal symptoms of hyperglycemia
(polyuria and polydipsia); a positive FPG or A1C can be used as a confirmatory test,
but if it is normal the OGTT should be performed or repeated. If the diagnosis of
diabetes is not confirmed, the patient resumes routine annual testing. (ADA-E; Consensus)
2-h OGTT plasma glucose ≥200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l)
FPG ≥126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l)
A1C ≥6.5% (A1C <6.5% does not rule out CFRD because this value is often spuriously
low in CF.)
Classical symptoms of diabetes (polyuria and polydipsia) in the presence of a casual
glucose level ≥200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l)
Diagnosing CFRD during acute illness or continuous feedings
There are special situations when a diagnosis of CFRD must be considered in patients
who are not in their baseline state of health. CF patients frequently first develop
hyperglycemia during stressors such as acute illness or continuous enteral nutrition.
Blood glucose levels may normalize when the stress is not present. In the past, this
was called “intermittent CFRD” (44). Longitudinal outcome data have shown that CF
morbidity and mortality are associated with CFRD first diagnosed in the acute illness
setting when hyperglycemia has persisted beyond 48 h (1,2,27). Based on this experience,
the committee developed the following recommendations.
The diagnosis of CFRD can be made in CF patients with acute illness (intravenous antibiotics
in the hospital or at home, systemic glucocorticoid therapy) when FPG levels ≥126
mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l) or 2-h postprandial plasma glucose levels ≥200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l)
persist for more than 48 h. (ADA-E; Consensus)
The diagnosis of CFRD can be made in CF patients on enteral continuous drip feedings
when mid- or postfeeding plasma glucose levels exceed 200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l) on two
separate days. (ADA-E; Consensus)
Gestational diabetes mellitus in CF
In the general population, the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO)
study showed a continuous risk of adverse perinatal and maternal outcomes with increasing
glycemia at 24–28 weeks' gestation (45), and a recent multicenter, randomized study
has demonstrated that aggressive treatment of mild gestational diabetes mellitus improves
outcomes (46).
Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus should be made based on the recommendations
of the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG)
(45) where diabetes is diagnosed based on 0-, 1-, and 2-h glucose levels with a 75-g
OGTT if any one of the following is present:
FPG ≥92 mg/dl (5.1 mmol/l)
1-h plasma glucose ≥180 mg/dl (10.0 mmol/l)
2-h plasma glucose ≥153 mg/dl (8.5 mmol/l)
CF patients with gestational diabetes mellitus are not considered to have CFRD but
require CFRD screening 6–12 weeks after the end of the pregnancy. (ADA-E; Consensus)
Differentiating CFRD with and without FH
The 1998 CFF CFRD Consensus Conference recommended that CFRD patients with and without
FH (FH+ and FH-, respectively) be categorized separately because differences in their
treatment needs were unknown (44). However, in a recent retrospective cohort study,
78 patients with CFRD FH- and 77 with CFRD FH+ were treated with insulin with similar
positive effects on nutritional status and lung function (1). In addition, in a randomized
controlled trial, insulin therapy reversed chronic weight loss in patients with CFRD
FH- (28), suggesting that both groups of CFRD patients should receive insulin treatment
and that there is no need to distinguish them diagnostically.
Distinguishing between CFRD with and without FH is not necessary. (ADA-B; USPSTF-D)
Date of onset of CFRD
Defining the date of onset of CFRD is important because long-term outcomes are related
to disease duration. Glucose tolerance gradually worsens with age in CF as a result
of steadily declining insulin production (1,47). At any point in time, however, an
individual's glucose tolerance may acutely fluctuate depending on his or her general
state of health.
The committee defined the onset of CFRD as the first time a patient meets diabetes
diagnostic criteria. Longitudinal studies of patients whose date of diagnosis was
considered to be either the first time they had a positive OGTT or the first time
they had persistent hyperglycemia during acute illness have shown that duration of
CFRD determined by these criteria correlates with clinically relevant outcomes including
microvascular complications (27) and mortality (1,2). Hyperglycemia may resolve without
treatment during periods of stable health, but insulin secretion remains insufficient
to control glucose under stress, and hyperglycemia will recur.
Although in the general population critically ill patients who experience stress hyperglycemia
are not given a diagnosis of diabetes, our recommendation differs for CF patients
who develop hyperglycemia during acute exacerbations of their chronic illness. In
CF, illness-associated hyperglycemia is a reflection of insulin insufficiency as well
as resistance and is a recurrent event. Defining the disease by this criterion encourages
early intervention to improve long-term outcomes.
The onset of CFRD should be defined as the date a person with CF first meets diagnostic
criteria, even if hyperglycemia subsequently abates. (ADA-E; Consensus)
MANAGEMENT OF CFRD
The care team
As per ADA guidelines, CFRD should be managed by a multidisciplinary team of health
professionals with expertise in CF and diabetes (5). The diabetes team should be intimately
familiar with CFRD, recognizing differences between this and type 1 and type 2 diabetes
pathophysiology and treatment. Good communication between diabetes and CF care providers
is essential. Poor team communication and inadequate or conflicting information from
health care providers have been identified as significant sources of stress for patients
with CFRD (48).
Although there are few CF-specific data, it has been well established in the general
diabetes population that patients must be given the educational tools and support
they need to assume a central role in determining their treatment goals and implementing
the management plan (5). Initial and ongoing diabetes self-management education (DSME)
is an integral component of care. In addition to medical issues, the role of the patient-centered
medical team is to encourage and support the patient and family. The treatment team
should address psychosocial issues and recognize the risk of depression. Emotional
well-being is strongly correlated with diabetes outcomes, and the additional diagnosis
of diabetes can be a significant burden. There may also be financial concerns associated
with this diagnosis.
Patients with CFRD should ideally be seen quarterly by a specialized multidisciplinary
team with expertise in diabetes and CF. (ADA-E; Consensus)
Patients with CFRD should receive ongoing DSME from diabetes education programs that
meet national standards for DSME. (ADA-E; Consensus)
Medical therapy
Patients with CFRD are insulin insufficient, and based on available data, insulin
is the only recommended treatment. There is evidence that CF patients on insulin therapy
who achieve glycemic control demonstrate improvement in weight, protein anabolism,
pulmonary function, and survival. Ten studies (with a total of 783 participants) were
identified that addressed insulin therapy in CFRD, including one randomized controlled
trial (28), five before-after studies (49
–53), one retrospective cohort study (1), one prospective cohort study (54), and two
case-control studies (29,30). These studies reported improved outcomes associated
with the use of insulin in patients with CFRD, including those without FH. Reported
outcomes included improved lung function (five studies) (29,30,49,51,54), improved
nutritional status (seven studies), (28,29,49
–53), improved blood glucose/A1C control (two studies) (50,53), decreased pulmonary
exacerbation rates (one study) (49), and decreased mortality (one study) (1).
There is little evidence regarding the superiority of specific insulin regimens in
CFRD, and clinical judgment should be used to choose the best regimen for each patient.
CFRD FH+ is usually treated with standard basal-bolus insulin regimens, including
a combination of basal and rapid-acting insulin by multiple daily subcutaneous injections,
or rapid-acting insulin by continuous subcutaneous infusion (insulin pump) (1,50,54,55).
CFRD patients still have endogenous insulin secretion, and, except during acute illness,
treatment is often similar to that of patients with type 1 diabetes in the honeymoon
period. During acute illness or systemic glucocorticoid treatment, insulin requirements
steeply rise, two- to fourfold. Once the illness resolves, it generally takes about
4–6 weeks for insulin requirements to gradually return to baseline. Careful monitoring
for hypoglycemia is required during this period. Specific insulin treatment suggestions
are presented in supplementary Table 2.
At the time of the last consensus conference (44), it was not clear whether CFRD patients
without FH should receive insulin treatment. A recently completed trial demonstrated
that treatment with premeal rapid-acting insulin was able to reverse chronic weight
loss in this population, and thus insulin therapy is indicated (28). Whether basal
insulin therapy alone (54) or basal-bolus insulin therapy would be as beneficial as
premeal insulin alone in CFRD FH- remains to be determined.
The available data suggest that oral agents are not as effective as insulin in CFRD.
Four studies (with a total of 153 participants) compared oral hypoglycemic therapy
with insulin therapy in CFRD (14,28,56,57). These included one randomized controlled
trial (28), one randomized controlled crossover trial (57), one prospective cohort
study (56), and one retrospective cohort study (14). Oral hypoglycemic agents studied
included sulfonylureas (e.g., glyburide), metformin, meglitinides (e.g., repaglinide),
and thiazolidinediones. The two observational studies (14,56) reported no differences
in lung function, nutritional status, or blood glucose/A1C control comparing those
who received oral hypoglycemic agents with those who received insulin. However, two
randomized studies suggested that oral hypoglycemic agents were not as effective as
insulin in improving nutritional status (28), blood glucose/A1C control (28), and
2-h and 5-h insulin area under the curve (57). Potential CF-specific concerns associated
with various noninsulin diabetes agents are presented in supplementary Table 3.
CF patients with CFRD should be treated with insulin therapy. (ADA-A; USPSTF-B)
Oral diabetes agents are not as effective as insulin in improving nutritional and
metabolic outcomes in CFRD and are not recommended outside the context of clinical
research trials. (ADA-A; USPSTF-D)
Management goals
ADA has established plasma glucose goals for people with diabetes (5). These are primarily
based on the need to decrease the risk of microvascular complications and thus apply
to CFRD with slight modifications (supplementary Table 4). Whether more stringent
goals should be adopted for CF patients based on the relationship between hyperglycemia,
nutrition, and pulmonary disease cannot be determined at present.
To safely achieve glucose goals, ADA recommends that all patients on insulin therapy
perform SMBG at least three times daily (5). Continuous glucose monitoring has been
validated in CF and may be useful for clinical management in some patients (58
–60).
Patients with CFRD who are on insulin should perform SMBG at least three times a day.
(ADA-E; Consensus)
Patients with CFRD should strive to attain plasma glucose goals as per the ADA recommendations
for all people with diabetes, bearing in mind that higher or lower goals may be indicated
for some patients and that individualization is important. (ADA-E; Consensus)
ADA considers A1C the primary target for glycemic control in type 1 and type 2 diabetes
(5). Although A1C levels may be spuriously low in CF (7,20,21,23,27,59,61), they are
generally higher in CF patients with CFRD compared with those with normal glucose
tolerance or IGT, and elevated levels are associated with increased risk of microvascular
complications (27). In one study of patients with >10-year duration CFRD, those with
retinopathy and/or microalbuminuria had average A1C levels of 8.0% compared with 5.8%
in CFRD patients with no eye or kidney changes, and 83% of those with microvascular
complications had A1C levels ≥7.0% (27), consistent with data in the general diabetes
population. For a given patient, the rise and fall in A1C may be a useful indicator
of trends in glycemic control. Thus, regular monitoring of A1C is advised.
A1C measurement is recommended quarterly for patients with CFRD. (ADA-E; Consensus)
For most patients with CFRD, the A1C treatment goal is ≤7% to reduce the risk of microvascular
complications, bearing in mind that higher or lower goals may be indicated for some
patients and that individualization is important. (ADA-B; USPSTF-B)
Diet and exercise in CFRD
CF patients have nutrition requirements which are well established (62
–64). Because adequate caloric intake to maintain BMI is critical to their health
and survival, the additional diagnosis of CFRD does not alter usual CF dietary recommendations
(Table 3). The goal is to achieve and maintain good nutritional status and normalize
blood glucose levels.
Table 3
Dietary recommendations for CFRD
Nutrient
Type 1 and type 2 diabetes
CFRD
Calories
As needed for growth, maintenance, or reduction diets
1.2–1.5 times DRI for age; individualized based on weight gain and growth
Carbohydrate
Individualized. Monitor carbohydrates to achieve glycemic control; choose from fruits,
vegetables, whole grains and fiber-containing foods, legumes, and low-fat milk. Sugar
alcohols and nonnutritive sweeteners are safe within U.S. Food and Drug Administration–established
consumption guidelines.
Individualized. Carbohydrates should be monitored to achieve glycemic control. Artificial
sweeteners should be used sparingly due to lower calorie content.
Fat
Limit saturated fat to <7% of total calories; intake of trans fat should be minimized;
limit dietary cholesterol to <200 mg/day. Consume two or more servings per week of
fish high in n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids.
No restriction on type of fat. High fat necessary for weight maintenance. Aim for
35–40% total calories.
Protein
15–20% of total calories; reduction to 0.8–1.0 g/kg with nephropathy
Approximately 1.5–2.0 times the DRI for age; no reduction for nephropathy
Sodium
<2,300 mg/day for blood pressure control
Liberal, high salt diet, especially in warm conditions and/or when exercising
Vitamins, minerals
No supplementation necessary unless deficiency noted
Routine supplementation with CF-specific multivitamins or a multivitamin and additional
fat-soluble vitamins A, D, E, and K
Alcohol
If consumed, limit to a moderate amount; one drink per day for women and two or less
drinks per day for men.
Consult with physician because of the higher prevalence of liver disease in CF and
possible use of hepatotoxic drugs.
Special circumstances
Gestational diabetes mellitus
Restricted calories/carbohydrate for weight and blood glucose control
No calorie or carbohydrate restriction; adequate kcals for weight gain
IGT
Weight loss of 5–10% recommended; low-fat diet
No weight loss. Spread carbohydrates throughout the day; consume nutrient-dense beverages.
DRI, daily recommended intake.
CF patients require a very high-calorie diet that is usually 120–150% of the daily
recommended intake for age because they have both increased resting energy expenditure
and increased loss of calories through malabsorption. Thus, calories should almost
never be restricted. The need for high caloric intake, however, does not replace well-established
principles of good nutrition and a healthy, well-balanced diet. A BMI ≥50th percentile
for ages 2–20 years and for adults a BMI ≥22 kg/m2 for female subjects and ≥23 kg/m2
for male subjects is the goal for all persons with CF (64). The use of carbohydrate
counting and insulin-to-carbohydrate ratios in conjunction with the usual CF diet
to guide insulin therapy can help to optimize glycemic control.
CFF evidence–based guidelines for nutritional management are recommended for patients
with CFRD. (ADA-E; Consensus)
Exercise is beneficial and is known to play a vital role in overall health. Most CF
patients including those with severe pulmonary disease (<40% predicted FEV1) are capable
of engaging in strength and aerobic exercise activities (65).
Patients with CFRD should be advised to do moderate aerobic exercise for at least
150 min per week. (ADA-E; Consensus)
COMPLICATIONS
Acute complications of CFRD
Acute complications of CFRD include hypoglycemia and, rarely, diabetic ketoacidosis
(DKA) or hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state. Because DKA is so uncommon (66), patients
are not routinely taught to measure ketones and any CF patient with DKA should be
screened for diabetes autoantibodies to rule out type 1 diabetes.
Hypoglycemia that is not severe (i.e., not requiring assistance from another individual)
is common even in CF patients without CFRD. It occurs both in the fasting state, where
it may reflect malnutrition and/or increased energy needs due to inflammation and
infection, and postprandially, where it is related to delayed and disordered insulin
secretion (67). Insulin-induced hypoglycemia can occur in CFRD as in any patient on
insulin therapy, although severe hypoglycemia may be less common in CF (68). While
CF patients do not have a good glucagon response to hypoglycemia (69), they have a
brisk catecholamine response and normal hypoglycemia awareness. Hypoglycemia education
including the use of glucagon is important for patients and their families. Regular
SMBG, especially during unusual activity, diet changes, or illness is the best protection
against insulin-induced hypoglycemia (5). Patients should be counseled regarding the
hypoglycemic effects of alcohol and the risks of driving or operating machinery while
hypoglycemic. They should be encouraged to exercise; however, they should be counseled
to check their glucose level before vigorous physical activity and to potentially
consume extra carbohydrate or alter their insulin dose, depending on the glucose level
and the intensity and duration of the planned exercise.
Education about the symptoms, prevention, and treatment of hypoglycemia, including
the use of glucagon, is recommended for patients with CFRD and their care partners.
(ADA-E; Consensus)
Chronic complications of CFRD
Microvascular disease does not typically become clinically apparent in CFRD until
patients have had the disease for at least 5 years and have developed FH (27,41,70).
Tight glycemic control and treatment of microalbuminuria with ACE inhibitors or angiotensin
receptor blockers combined with optimal control of hypertension delay progression
of diabetic renal disease in the general diabetes population (5). They are assumed
to also be beneficial in CFRD although there are no specific data in this population.
ACE inhibitors are associated with development of cough in ∼10% of subjects, and this
can occur months after drug initiation—a side effect with special significance in
CF as increased cough is among the symptoms of a pulmonary exacerbation (71). Cough
may also occur with angiotensin receptor blockers but is less frequent (∼1%).
Early diabetic nephropathy is characterized by microalbuminuria (a spot urine ACR
of 30–299 μg/mg creatinine) (5). Macroalbuminuria (≥300 μg/mg creatinine) indicates
clinically significant nephropathy that is progressing toward renal failure. A patient
must demonstrate two out of three abnormal tests within a 3- to 6-month period to
receive a diagnosis. Renal failure due solely to diabetes is uncommon in CF, but microalbuminuria
has been reported to occur in 4–21% of individuals with CFRD (27,41,70). Recent strenuous
exercise, fever, hypertension, congestive heart failure, infection, menstruation,
and orthostatic proteinuria can result in a positive screen. It is therefore important
to exclude other causes before concluding that microalbuminuria is CFRD related.
Diabetic retinopathy is seen in ∼10–23% of patients with CFRD and is seldom severe,
although isolated severe cases have been reported (27,41,43,70,72). As in all persons
with diabetes, dilated retinal exams are necessary in patients with CFRD to evaluate
for the presence of retinopathy and the need for treatment.
Annual neurologic assessment and foot evaluation are recommended for the general diabetes
population (5). Current data suggest that the severity of this microvascular complication
may be less in CFRD (27). Gastroparesis is common in CF patients with and without
CFRD, and the role that CFRD plays in aggravating this condition can be difficult
to determine (27). Gastroparesis may make good glycemic control difficult to achieve.
Hypertension is not uncommon in adult CF patients, particularly after transplantation
(41). Although atherosclerotic vascular disease has not been described in CF, hypertension
is a known risk factor for diabetic kidney disease. As for all persons with diabetes,
the recommended systolic and diastolic blood pressure goals are ≤130 mmHg and ≤80
mmHg, respectively, or <90th percentile for age and sex for pediatric patients (5).
Hyperlipidemia is rare in CF but may occur, especially after transplantation or in
pancreatic-sufficient individuals. While cholesterol levels are typically quite low,
isolated triglyceride elevation has been noted. Because CF patients are at low risk
for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, it is not clear that lipid elevation requires
treatment in this population, and there are no data regarding the efficacy or safety
of medical therapy for CF dyslipidemia. CFRD is not an autoimmune disease; thus, there
is no increased risk of other autoimmune endocrinopathies.
Patients with CFRD should have their blood pressure measured at every routine diabetes
visit as per ADA guidelines. Patients found to have systolic blood pressure ≥130 mmHg
or diastolic blood pressure ≥80 mmHg or >90th percentile for age and sex for pediatric
patients should have repeat measurement on a separate day to confirm a diagnosis of
hypertension. (ADA-E; Consensus)
Annual monitoring for microvascular complications of diabetes is recommended using
ADA guidelines, beginning 5 years after the diagnosis of CFRD or, if the exact time
of diagnosis is not known, at the time that fasting hyperglycemia is first diagnosed.
(ADA-E; Consensus)
Patients with CFRD diagnosed with hypertension or microvascular complications should
receive treatment as recommended by ADA for all people with diabetes, except that
there is no restriction of sodium and, in general, no protein restriction. (ADA-E;
Consensus)
An annual lipid profile is recommended for patients with CFRD and pancreatic exocrine
sufficiency or if any of the following risk factors are present: obesity, family history
of coronary artery disease, or immunosuppressive therapy following transplantation.
(ADA-E; Consensus)
FUTURE RESEARCH CONSIDERATIONS
The CFRD Guidelines Committee identified the following as the most pressing research
questions in CFRD: 1) Do nondiabetic CF patients with abnormal glucose tolerance benefit
from diabetes therapy and, if so, what method of treatment has the greatest impact
on nutritional and pulmonary status? 2) What are the obstacles to OGTT screening of
the CF population and how can they best be overcome? 3) What are the mechanisms by
which CFRD impacts pulmonary function and survival in CF? 4) Should target goals for
glucose and/or A1C in CFRD differ from ADA target goals? 5) How can we assess and
improve patient acceptance of the diagnosis of CFRD to improve diabetes self-management
and psychosocial well-being?