1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparing Visual Performance and Subjective Outcomes with an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens When Targeted for Emmetropia or Monovision

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To evaluate relative visual performance and subjective outcomes after implantation of the TECNIS Eyhance™ intraocular lens (IOL) targeted for bilateral emmetropia or monovision.

          Methods

          This was a prospective, single-center randomized, patient-masked trial. Patients were implanted with the enhanced IOL targeted for bilateral emmetropia or slight monovision (−0.75 D in the non-dominant eye). At 3 months the binocular visual acuity (VA) was measured at distance, intermediate and near, along with low contrast VA in photopic and mesopic conditions, and the distance corrected defocus curve. Questionnaires related to spectacle independence, satisfaction, visual symptoms, and functional vision were administered.

          Results

          Data from 71 subjects (34 Emmetropia, 37 Monovision) were analyzed. There was no difference in the mean uncorrected distance VA (p = 0.11), but uncorrected intermediate and near VAs were one line better in the Monovision group (p = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively). Mesopic and photopic low contrast VA were similar between groups. There was a trend for less difficulty and higher satisfaction with near and intermediate vision in the Monovision group, but no significant differences in any of the subjective questionnaires. Difficulty reading was the most reported concern in both groups, though 93% of all subjects reported “little” or “no” difficulty with daily activities. Overall, 82% of subjects were “completely” or “very” happy with their lens choice.

          Conclusion

          Using this enhanced IOL with slight monovision in the non-dominant eye increased intermediate and near VA with no apparent effect on low contrast distance VA, subjective visual quality, or satisfaction.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.

          Good unaided distance visual acuity (VA) is now a realistic expectation following cataract surgery and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Near vision, however, still requires additional refractive power, usually in the form of reading glasses. Multiple optic (multifocal) IOLs are available which claim to allow good vision at a range of distances. It is unclear whether this benefit outweighs the optical compromises inherent in multifocal IOLs.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Visual outcome, optical quality, and patient satisfaction with a new monofocal IOL, enhanced for intermediate vision: preliminary results

            To compare visual outcomes, contrast sensitivity, optical quality, spectacle independence, and visual disturbances in patients implanted with 2 models of monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Multifocal and Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses in 2020.

              Ophthalmic surgeons have been overwhelmed by the influx of multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) options in recent years, with close to 100 IOLs on the market in 2020. This practical and technical update on a representative group of established as well as newly launched multifocal IOLs on the market focuses on multifocal IOLs, including extended depth-of-focus lenses. We also describe the optical basis of lens platforms used and thorough preoperative planning to aid decision making. This allows the surgeon the knowledge base to deliver the required relative customized spectacle independence with the least photic phenomenon and loss of contrast possible while achieving high individual patient satisfaction. Data of reviewed IOLs displayed in tabular format include mean monocular uncorrected distance, intermediate, and near visual acuities (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution), with standard deviations and ranges where available. The range of vision targeted, pupil dependence, toric availability, as well as type of optical platform, are provided as a practical guide to demystify existing terminology on the market that may create interest around a seemingly new design that is actually not novel at all. Halos and glare experienced, levels of patient satisfaction, and spectacle independence achieved also are summarized. A wide range of multifocal IOLs options are available on the market to surgeons. Comprehensive patient selection and examination, combined with knowledge of the most recent options and adequate patient counseling, including neuroadaptation, can avoid dissatisfaction. Many recently available IOLs are awaiting formal results, but the methods by which we label and compare these types of IOLs must also be standardized.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Ophthalmol
                Clin Ophthalmol
                opth
                Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
                Dove
                1177-5467
                1177-5483
                01 December 2023
                2023
                : 17
                : 3693-3702
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Carolina Eyecare Physicians / US Eye , Mt. Pleasant, SC, USA
                [2 ]Science in Vision , Frisco, TX, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Kerry D Solomon, Carolina Eyecare Physicians, LLC , 1101 Clarity Road, Suite 100, Mt. Pleasant, SC, 29464, USA, Email ksolomon@cepmd.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0964-5035
                Article
                442752
                10.2147/OPTH.S442752
                10697088
                38058694
                09ba7b7c-0a37-491a-8052-6fb26d69cfa9
                © 2023 Sandoval et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 01 October 2023
                : 29 November 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 4, References: 26, Pages: 10
                Funding
                Funded by: Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision;
                The study was supported by an investigator-initiated study grant from Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Santa Ana, USA.
                Categories
                Clinical Trial Report

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                tecnis eyhance,enhanced monofocal,monofocal plus,monovision
                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                tecnis eyhance, enhanced monofocal, monofocal plus, monovision

                Comments

                Comment on this article