1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Validation of newly derived polygenic risk scores for dementia in a prospective study of older individuals

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction:

          Recent genome-wide association studies identified new dementia-associated variants. We assessed the performance of updated polygenic risk scores (PRSs) using these variants in an independent cohort.

          Methods:

          We used Cox models and area under the curve (AUC) to validate new PRSs (PRS-83SNP, PRS-SBayesR, and PRS-CS) compared with an older PRS-23SNP in 12,031 initially-healthy participants ≥70 years of age. Dementia was rigorously adjudicated according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria.

          Results:

          PRS-83SNP, PRS-SBayesR, and PRS-CS were associated with incident dementia, with fully adjusted (including apolipoprotein E [ APOE] ε4) hazard ratios per standard deviation (SD) of 1.35 (1.23–1.47), 1.37 (1.25–1.50), and 1.42 (1.30–1.56), respectively. The AUC of a model containing conventional/non-genetic factors and APOE was 74.7%. This was improved to 75.7% ( p = 0.007), 76% ( p = 0.004), and 76.1% ( p = 0.003) with addition of PRS-83SNP, PRS-SBayesR, and PRS-CS, respectively. The PRS-23SNP did not improve AUC (74.7%, p = 0.95).

          Conclusion:

          New PRSs for dementia significantly improve risk-prediction performance, but still account for less risk than APOE genotype overall.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Comparing the Areas under Two or More Correlated Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves: A Nonparametric Approach

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Next-generation genotype imputation service and methods.

              Genotype imputation is a key component of genetic association studies, where it increases power, facilitates meta-analysis, and aids interpretation of signals. Genotype imputation is computationally demanding and, with current tools, typically requires access to a high-performance computing cluster and to a reference panel of sequenced genomes. Here we describe improvements to imputation machinery that reduce computational requirements by more than an order of magnitude with no loss of accuracy in comparison to standard imputation tools. We also describe a new web-based service for imputation that facilitates access to new reference panels and greatly improves user experience and productivity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                101231978
                33173
                Alzheimers Dement
                Alzheimers Dement
                Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association
                1552-5260
                1552-5279
                10 July 2023
                December 2023
                12 May 2023
                01 June 2024
                : 19
                : 12
                : 5333-5342
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                [2 ]Department Genetics and Genomic Sciences and Ronald M. Loeb Center for Alzheimer’s Disease, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
                [3 ]Departments of Neurology and Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
                [4 ]Cognitive Health Initiative, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                [5 ]Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                [6 ]Department of Family & Preventive Medicine and the Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
                [7 ]Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
                [8 ]Department of Neurology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                [9 ]Department of Clinical Neurosciences, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                [10 ]Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
                [11 ]Division of Geriatrics, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
                [12 ]Department of Neurology, Melbourne Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
                [13 ]Department of Neuroscience, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
                [14 ]Department of Neurology and the Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
                [15 ]Berman Center for Outcomes and Clinical Research, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Hennepin Healthcare, and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Chenglong Yu, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 5, 553 St. Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia. chenglong.yu@ 123456monash.edu
                Article
                NIHMS1912912
                10.1002/alz.13113
                10640662
                37177856
                09875c7d-15ea-4b04-845b-95ee19a1c86e

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                apoe gene,incident dementia,longitudinal study,polygenic risk score

                Comments

                Comment on this article