7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Tradeoffs Associated With Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Women Choosing Breast Reconstruction : Results of a Prospective Multicenter Cohort

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Assess postoperative morbidity and patient-reported outcomes after unilateral and bilateral breast reconstruction in patients with unilateral breast cancer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Twenty-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy, Lumpectomy, and Lumpectomy plus Irradiation for the Treatment of Invasive Breast Cancer

          New England Journal of Medicine, 347(16), 1233-1241
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment.

            Many patients with unilateral breast cancer choose contralateral prophylactic mastectomy to prevent cancer in the opposite breast. The purpose of our study was to determine the use and trends of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in the United States. We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database to review the treatment of patients with unilateral breast cancer diagnosed from 1998 through 2003. We determined the rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy as a proportion of all surgically treated patients and as a proportion of all mastectomies. We identified 152,755 patients with stage I, II, or III breast cancer; 4,969 patients chose contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. The rate was 3.3% for all surgically treated patients; 7.7%, for patients undergoing mastectomy. The overall rate significantly increased from 1.8% in 1998 to 4.5% in 2003. Likewise, the contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rate for patients undergoing mastectomy significantly increased from 4.2% in 1998 to 11.0% in 2003. These increased rates applied to all cancer stages and continued to the end of our study period. Young patient age, non-Hispanic white race, lobular histology, and previous cancer diagnosis were associated with significantly higher rates. Large tumor size was associated with a higher overall rate, but with a lower rate for patients undergoing mastectomy. The use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in the United States more than doubled within the recent 6-year period of our study. Prospective studies are needed to understand the decision-making processes that have led to more aggressive breast cancer surgery.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Toward a Common Framework for Statistical Analysis and Development

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Annals of Surgery
                Annals of Surgery
                Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
                0003-4932
                2017
                July 2017
                : 266
                : 1
                : 158-164
                Article
                10.1097/SLA.0000000000001840
                5459619
                27355266
                095f0d70-b190-43d1-8524-314560cc749a
                © 2017
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article