31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict

      , , , , , ,
      European Journal of Marketing
      Emerald

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Partial least squares (PLS) has been introduced as a “causal-predictive” approach to structural equation modeling (SEM), designed to overcome the apparent dichotomy between explanation and prediction. However, while researchers using PLS-SEM routinely stress the predictive nature of their analyses, model evaluation assessment relies exclusively on metrics designed to assess the path model’s explanatory power. Recent research has proposed PLSpredict, a holdout sample-based procedure that generates case-level predictions on an item or a construct level. This paper offers guidelines for applying PLSpredict and explains the key choices researchers need to make using the procedure.

          Design/methodology/approach

          The authors discuss the need for prediction-oriented model evaluations in PLS-SEM and conceptually explain and further advance the PLSpredict method. In addition, they illustrate the PLSpredict procedure’s use with a tourism marketing model and provide recommendations on how the results should be interpreted. While the focus of the paper is on the PLSpredict procedure, the overarching aim is to encourage the routine prediction-oriented assessment in PLS-SEM analyses.

          Findings

          The paper advances PLSpredict and offers guidance on how to use this prediction-oriented model evaluation approach. Researchers should routinely consider the assessment of the predictive power of their PLS path models. PLSpredict is a useful and straightforward approach to evaluate the out-of-sample predictive capabilities of PLS path models that researchers can apply in their studies.

          Research limitations/implications

          Future research should seek to extend PLSpredict’s capabilities, for example, by developing more benchmarks for comparing PLS-SEM results and empirically contrasting the earliest antecedent and the direct antecedent approaches to predictive power assessment.

          Practical implications

          This paper offers clear guidelines for using PLSpredict, which researchers and practitioners should routinely apply as part of their PLS-SEM analyses.

          Originality/value

          This research substantiates the use of PLSpredict. It provides marketing researchers and practitioners with the knowledge they need to properly assess, report and interpret PLS-SEM results. Thereby, this research contributes to safeguarding the rigor of marketing studies using PLS-SEM.

          Related collections

          Most cited references75

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Estimating the Dimension of a Model

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                European Journal of Marketing
                EJM
                Emerald
                0309-0566
                0309-0566
                November 11 2019
                November 11 2019
                : 53
                : 11
                : 2322-2347
                Article
                10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189
                094fafd4-c9ed-47f4-ae6f-80eec7310dc8
                © 2019

                https://www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article