11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reorganisation of Hoxd regulatory landscapes during the evolution of a snake-like body plan

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Within land vertebrate species, snakes display extreme variations in their body plan, characterized by the absence of limbs and an elongated morphology. Such a particular interpretation of the basic vertebrate body architecture has often been associated with changes in the function or regulation of Hox genes. Here, we use an interspecies comparative approach to investigate different regulatory aspects at the snake HoxD locus. We report that, unlike in other vertebrates, snake mesoderm-specific enhancers are mostly located within the HoxD cluster itself rather than outside. In addition, despite both the absence of limbs and an altered Hoxd gene regulation in external genitalia, the limb-associated bimodal HoxD chromatin structure is maintained at the snake locus. Finally, we show that snake and mouse orthologous enhancer sequences can display distinct expression specificities. These results show that vertebrate morphological evolution likely involved extensive reorganisation at Hox loci, yet within a generally conserved regulatory framework.

          DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16087.001

          eLife digest

          Animals with a backbone can look remarkably different from one another, like fish and birds, for example. Nevertheless, these animals – which are also known as vertebrates – have many genes in common that shape their bodies during development. These genes include a family called the Hox genes, which control how an animal’s body parts develop from its head to its tail and are needed to shape the animal’s limbs. Hox genes are found clustered in groups within a vertebrate’s DNA, and large regions of DNA on either side of a Hox cluster can, in some cases, physically interact with the Hox genes to regulate their expression.

          So how do the same genes produce different body shapes? Different vertebrates regulate where and when their Hox genes are switched off and on in different ways. As such, it is likely that differences in gene regulation, rather than in the genes themselves, lead embryos to develop into the distinct shapes seen across the animal kingdom.

          Snakes – for example – evolved from a lizard-like ancestor into elongated limbless animals as they have adapted to a burrowing lifestyle. However, it was not known if changes in how Hox genes are regulated have played a role in shaping the distinct body plan of snakes.

          Guerreiro et al. have now compared how Hox genes are regulated in snakes, mice and other vertebrates, focusing on corn snakes and one particular cluster of Hox genes called the HoxD cluster. The comparison revealed that these Hox genes are regulated differently in developing snakes than in other vertebrate embryos. This is particularly the case for tissues that show the most differences when compared with other animals (such as the torso and genitals) or that are absent (such as the limbs). Although Hoxd genes are activated at different times and places in snakes than in other vertebrates, snake Hox genes appear to be regulated using the same general mechanisms as mouse Hox genes.

          Guerreiro et al. suggest that changes to Hoxd gene regulation have contributed to the evolution of the snake’s shape and have most likely influenced the body shapes of other vertebrates as well. However, the findings also suggest that these gene regulatory changes have been constrained by an existing regulatory mechanism that has been maintained throughout evolution. It remains for future work to address whether these changes in Hox gene regulation are a cause or a consequence of the snake’s extreme body shape, or indeed a combination of the two.

          DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16087.002

          Related collections

          Most cited references72

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila.

          E B Lewis (1978)
          The bithorax gene complex in Drosophila contains a minimum of eight genes that seem to code for substances controlling levels of thoracic and abdominal development. The state of repression of at least four of these genes is controlled by cis-regulatory elements and a separate locus (Polycomb) seems to code for a repressor of the complex. The wild-type and mutant segmentation patterns are consistent with an antero-posterior gradient in repressor concentration along the embryo and a proximo-distal gradient along the chromosome in the affinities for repressor of each gene's cis-regulatory element.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A highly efficient Escherichia coli-based chromosome engineering system adapted for recombinogenic targeting and subcloning of BAC DNA.

            Recently, a highly efficient recombination system for chromosome engineering in Escherichia coli was described that uses a defective lambda prophage to supply functions that protect and recombine a linear DNA targeting cassette with its substrate sequence (Yu et al., 2000, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 5978-5983). Importantly, the recombination is proficient with DNA homologies as short as 30-50 bp, making it possible to use PCR-amplified fragments as the targeting cassette. Here, we adapt this prophage system for use in bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) engineering by transferring it to DH10B cells, a BAC host strain. In addition, arabinose inducible cre and flpe genes are introduced into these cells to facilitate BAC modification using loxP and FRT sites. Next, we demonstrate the utility of this recombination system by using it to target cre to the 3' end of the mouse neuron-specific enolase (Eno2) gene carried on a 250-kb BAC, which made it possible to generate BAC transgenic mice that specifically express Cre in all mature neurons. In addition, we show that fragments as large as 80 kb can be subcloned from BACs by gap repair using this recombination system, obviating the need for restriction enzymes or DNA ligases. Finally, we show that BACs can be modified with this recombination system in the absence of drug selection. The ability to modify or subclone large fragments of genomic DNA with precision should facilitate many kinds of genomic experiments that were difficult or impossible to perform previously and aid in studies of gene function in the postgenomic era. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Zebrafish hox clusters and vertebrate genome evolution.

              HOX genes specify cell fate in the anterior-posterior axis of animal embryos. Invertebrate chordates have one HOX cluster, but mammals have four, suggesting that cluster duplication facilitated the evolution of vertebrate body plans. This report shows that zebrafish have seven hox clusters. Phylogenetic analysis and genetic mapping suggest a chromosome doubling event, probably by whole genome duplication, after the divergence of ray-finned and lobe-finned fishes but before the teleost radiation. Thus, teleosts, the most species-rich group of vertebrates, appear to have more copies of these developmental regulatory genes than do mammals, despite less complexity in the anterior-posterior axis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Reviewing editor
                Journal
                eLife
                Elife
                eLife
                eLife
                eLife
                eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
                2050-084X
                01 August 2016
                2016
                : 5
                : e16087
                Affiliations
                [1 ]deptDepartment of Genetics and Evolution , University of Geneva , Geneva, Switzerland
                [2 ]Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência , Lisbon, Portugal
                [3 ]deptSchool of Life Sciences , Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne , Lausanne, Switzerland
                [4]Stowers Institute for Medical Research , United States
                [5]Stowers Institute for Medical Research , United States
                Author notes
                [†]

                Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9744-0912
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9961-2960
                Article
                16087
                10.7554/eLife.16087
                4969037
                27476854
                085885e0-df6d-4166-9790-4e566ad71c96
                © 2016, Guerreiro et al

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 16 March 2016
                : 10 July 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001871, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia;
                Award ID: PTDB/BEX-BID/0899/2014
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001711, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung;
                Award ID: 310030B_138662
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000781, European Research Council;
                Award ID: 232790
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Claraz Foundation;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100006389, Université de Genève;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003992, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Espírito Santo;
                Award Recipient :
                The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
                Categories
                Developmental Biology and Stem Cells
                Genomics and Evolutionary Biology
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                2.5
                Despite their extreme morphologies, snakes display a global regulatory strategy of their Hox genes similar to that implemented by mammals with, however, important modifications in enhancer specificity.

                Life sciences
                snakes,squamata,reptiles,mouse
                Life sciences
                snakes, squamata, reptiles, mouse

                Comments

                Comment on this article