7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Exploring the recovery curve for gastrointestinal symptoms from the acute COVID‐19 phase to long‐term post‐COVID: The LONG‐COVID‐EXP‐CM Multicenter Study

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To the editor, The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) mainly affects the respiratory system; however, extrapulmonary (e.g., gastrointestinal or musculoskeletal) symptoms are also experienced during the acute phase. 1 The presence of gastrointestinal symptoms, particularly diarrhea, at onset is associated with hospitalization 2 and represents an overall risk factor for poor hospitalization outcomes and increased severity. 3 These symptoms are also present after the acute phase. Previous studies reported a prevalence of gastrointestinal post‐COVID symptoms ranging from 10% to 25%. 4 , 5 Most studies investigating post‐COVID gastrointestinal symptoms used cross‐sectional designs. Since the presence of long‐term post‐COVID symptoms is associated with lower quality of life, 6 understanding the longitudinal pattern of gastrointestinal symptoms could have significant implications for diagnosis, triaging, and management of these patients. This Letter to the Editor analyzes the recovery curve of gastrointestinal symptoms using mosaic plots and an exponential bar plot model, showing the evolution of these symptoms from hospital admission to the first year after hospital discharge. The LONG‐COVID‐EXP‐CM is a multicenter cohort study, including patients with a diagnosis of SARS‐CoV‐2 by the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction technique and radiological findings hospitalized during the first wave of the pandemic (from March 10 to May 31, 2020) in five hospitals of Madrid (Spain). A sample of 400 patients from each hospital was randomly selected. The Ethics Committees of all hospitals approved the study (HUFA20/126, HUIL/092‐20, HCSC20/495E, HSO25112020, HUF/EC1517). Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Patients were scheduled for a telephone interview conducted by trained healthcare professionals at two follow‐up periods with a 5‐month period in between. They were systematically asked about gastrointestinal post‐COVID symptoms, particularly diarrhea. Clinical (age, gender, height, weight, comorbidities) and hospitalization (onset symptoms at hospital admission, days at hospital, intensive care unit admission) data were collected from hospital records. The exponential curves were fitted to the data according to the formula y = K e ct , where y represents the modeled prevalence of a symptom (diarrhea or gastrointestinal) at time t (in months), and K and c are the parameters of the model. From 2000 individuals randomly selected and invited to participate, a total of 1593 (age: 61.5, SD: 16 years, 46.5% women) were included at hospital admission (T0), and at 8.4 (range 6–10, T1) and 13.2 (range 11–15, T2) months after discharge. The prevalence of diarrhea decreased from 10.8% (n = 172) at hospital admission (T0) to 2.25% (n = 36) at T1, to 1% (n= 16) at T2 (Figure 1). As shown in Figure 1, 94% of patients (n = 162/172) presenting diarrhea at hospital admission (T0) had recovered at T1. Further, 71% (n = 26/36) of those with diarrhea at T1, developed it “de novo” (did not experience diarrhea at T0). The prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms was 6.7% (n = 107) at T1 and 4.5% (n = 72) at T2. Figure 2 graphs the fitted exponential curves visualizing a decreased prevalence trend over time. Figure 1  Mosaic plots of diarrhea at (from left to right): T0 (hospital admission) vs. T1 (8.4 months after hospital discharge), T1 vs. T2 (13.2 months after hospital discharge), and T0 vs. T2. Figure 2 Recovery curve of self‐reported diarrhea (in light blue) or gastrointestinal (in light red) symptoms. Vertical bars represent the percentage of patients who have diarrhea (in light blue) or gastrointestinal symptoms (light red) at any given time (opacity indicates the sample size at that follow‐up). The mean values used for the development of the mosaic plots have been marked with asterisks in the graphs. This is the first time analyzing the curve of recovery of post‐COVID gastrointestinal symptoms in previously hospitalized COVID‐19 survivors. Our prevalence rates of post‐COVID gastrointestinal symptom agree with previous data. 4 , 5 Nevertheless, most studies included smaller samples, data from single centers, and shorter follow‐up periods. 4 , 5 At hospital admission, the presence of diarrhea was noted but not the gastrointestinal symptoms since most patients specified only diarrhea. It is possible that overall gastrointestinal symptoms can be underreported at the acute phase of infection if not specifically investigated since they are not as bothersome as other COVID‐19‐related symptoms, such as fever, dyspnea, or chest pain. Since gastrointestinal cells exhibit high expression levels of the angiotensin‐converting enzyme II receptor (ACE2) and transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS3), they can be invaded by SARS‐CoV‐2, resulting in gastrointestinal inflammation. 7 , 8 Accordingly, gastrointestinal symptoms may be responsible for enhanced exposure and significant viral load for a prolonged time period. In fact, our exponential recovery curve suggests that gastrointestinal symptoms can be present until three or more years after hospitalization. Identifying the risk factors associated with the development of gastrointestinal symptoms could help to better management of long‐haulers. Limitations are as follows. First, only hospitalized patients were included. Second, we focused on gastrointestinal symptoms. Interactions between different post‐COVID symptoms are common. For instance, Blackett et al. observed that mental health was associated with gastrointestinal symptoms at the post‐COVID phase, suggesting that gastrointestinal symptoms may be partially due to heightened stress and anxiety levels. 8 Future studies should investigate interactions between different post‐COVID symptoms. In conclusion, exponential recovery curves reveal that gastrointestinal symptoms tend to recover the following 2 or 3 years after SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in previously hospitalized COVID‐19 survivors. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS All authors contributed to the study concept and design. César Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, José D. Martín‐Guerrero, and Oscar J. Pellicer‐Valero conducted literature review and did the statistical analysis. All authors recruited participants and collected data. Juan Torres‐Macho and Carlos Guijarro supervised the study. All authors contributed to the interpretation of data and drafting the paper. All authors revised the text for intellectual content and have read and approved the final version of the manuscript. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The authors declare no conflicts of interest. ETHICS STATEMENT Participants provided informed consent before collecting data.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Post‐acute COVID‐19 syndrome (PCS) and health‐related quality of life (HRQoL)—A systematic review and meta‐analysis

          Abstract There is an established literature on the symptoms and complications of COVID‐19 but the after‐effects of COVID‐19 are not well understood with few studies reporting persistent symptoms and quality of life. We aim to evaluate the pooled prevalence of poor quality of life in post‐acute COVID‐19 syndrome (PCS) and conducted meta‐regression to evaluate the effects of persistent symptoms and intensive care unit (ICU) admission on the poor quality of life. We extracted data from observational studies describing persistent symptoms and quality of life in post‐COVID‐19 patients from March 10, 2020, to March 10, 2021, following PRISMA guidelines with a consensus of two independent reviewers. We calculated the pooled prevalence with 95% confidence interval (CI) and created forest plots using random‐effects models. A total of 12 studies with 4828 PCS patients were included. We found that amongst PCS patients, the pooled prevalence of poor quality of life (EQ‐VAS) was (59%; 95% CI: 42%–75%). Based on individual factors in the EQ‐5D‐5L questionnaire, the prevalence of mobility was (36, 10–67), personal care (8, 1–21), usual quality (28, 2–65), pain/discomfort (42, 28–55), and anxiety/depression (38, 19–58). The prevalence of persistent symptoms was fatigue (64, 54–73), dyspnea (39.5, 20–60), anosmia (20, 15–24), arthralgia (24.3, 14–36), headache (21, 3–47), sleep disturbances (47, 7–89), and mental health (14.5, 4–29). Meta‐regression analysis showed the poor quality of life was significantly higher among post‐COVID‐19 patients with ICU admission (p = 0.004) and fatigue (p = 0.0015). Our study concludes that PCS is associated with poor quality of life, persistent symptoms including fatigue, dyspnea, anosmia, sleep disturbances, and worse mental health. This suggests that we need more research on PCS patients to understand the risk factors causing it and eventually leading to poor quality of life.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Extrapulmonary complications of COVID‐19: A multisystem disease?

            Abstract The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), has been recently declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. In addition to its acute respiratory manifestations, SARS‐CoV‐2 may also adversely affect other organ systems. To date, however, there is a very limited understanding of the extent and management of COVID‐19‐related conditions outside of the pulmonary system. This narrative review provides an overview of the current literature about the extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID‐19 that may affect the urinary, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, hematological, hematopoietic, neurological, or reproductive systems. This review also describes the current understanding of the extrapulmonary complications caused by COVID‐19 to improve the management and prognosis of patients with COVID‐19.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Intestinal inflammation modulates the expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and potentially overlaps with the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 related disease

              Background and Aims The presence of gastrointestinal symptoms and high levels of viral RNA in the stool suggest active Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication within enterocytes. Methods Here, in multiple, large cohorts of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), we have studied the intersections between Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), intestinal inflammation and IBD treatment. Results A striking expression of ACE2 on the small bowel enterocyte brush border supports intestinal infectivity by SARS-CoV-2. Commonly used IBD medications, both biologic and non-biologic, do not significantly impact ACE2 and TMPRSS2 receptor expression in the uninflamed intestines. Additionally, we have defined molecular responses to COVID-19 infection that are also enriched in IBD, pointing to shared molecular networks between COVID-19 and IBD. Conclusions These data generate a novel appreciation of the confluence of COVID-19- and IBD-associated inflammation and provide mechanistic insights supporting further investigation of specific IBD drugs in the treatment of COVID-19.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                cesar.fernandez@urjc.es
                Journal
                J Med Virol
                J Med Virol
                10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9071
                JMV
                Journal of Medical Virology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0146-6615
                1096-9071
                26 March 2022
                26 March 2022
                : 10.1002/jmv.27727
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (URJC) Madrid Spain
                [ 2 ] Intelligent Data Analysis Laboratory, Department of Electronic Engineering, ETSE (Engineering School) Universitat de València (UV) Valencia Spain
                [ 3 ] Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology Universitat de València (UV) València Spain
                [ 4 ] Department of Medicine Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) Madrid Spain
                [ 5 ] Department of Internal Medicine Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor‐Virgen de la Torre Madrid Spain
                [ 6 ] Department of Internal Medicine Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón Madrid Spain
                [ 7 ] Department of Medicine Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (URJC) Madrid Spain
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence César Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (URJC), Avenida de Atenas s/n, 28922 Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.

                Email: cesar.fernandez@ 123456urjc.es

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3772-9690
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9378-0285
                Article
                JMV27727
                10.1002/jmv.27727
                9088575
                35315087
                07f7308a-8f81-43c7-975c-1a8b5ac15c04
                © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                : 26 February 2022
                : 18 March 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 0, Pages: 3, Words: 1414
                Funding
                Funded by: Consejería de Sanidad, Comunidad de Madrid , doi 10.13039/501100006541;
                Categories
                Letter to the Editor
                Letter to the Editor
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.5 mode:remove_FC converted:10.05.2022

                Microbiology & Virology
                Microbiology & Virology

                Comments

                Comment on this article