17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound for the Treatment of Bone Delayed Union or Nonunion: A Review

      , ,
      Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The goal of this review is to present the most updated knowledge derived from basic science, animal studies and clinical trials, concerning biophysical stimulation of bone repair through low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS), with particular reference to the management of delayed unions and nonunions. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound LIPUS has been proved to significantly stimulate and accelerate fresh fracture healing in animal studies and in randomized controlled clinical trials. LIPUS also appears as an effective and safe home treatment of aseptic and septic delayed-unions and nonunions, with a healing rate ranging from 70% to 93% in different, nonrandomized, studies. Advantages of the use of this technology that may avoid the need for additional complex operations for the treatment of nonunions, include efficacy, safety, ease of use and favourable cost/benefit ratio. Outcomes depend on the site of nonunion, time elapsed from trauma, stability at the site of nonunion and host type. The detailed biophysical process by which low-intensity pulsed ultrasound LIPUS stimulates bone regeneration still remains unknown, even if various effects on bone cells in vitro and in vivo have been described.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
          Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
          Elsevier BV
          03015629
          April 2009
          April 2009
          : 35
          : 4
          : 529-536
          Article
          10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.09.029
          19097683
          07c2df51-6599-4ad9-823d-0ddfc2cfb357
          © 2009

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article