5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A Phase III multicentre, randomized, double-blind trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral contezolid versus linezolid in adults with complicated skin and soft tissue infections

      , , , ,
      Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          Contezolid is a novel oxazolidinone antibacterial agent for managing infections caused by aerobic and anaerobic Gram-positive bacteria including methicillin-resistant strains. A Phase III, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of contezolid versus linezolid in adults with complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs).

          Methods

          Adult patients with cSSTI were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to receive contezolid 800 mg or linezolid 600 mg q12h for 7–14 days. Clinical cure rate and safety were assessed at the test of cure (TOC) visit in the full analysis set (FAS) and clinical evaluable (CE) population. Non-inferiority was defined as a lower limit of the 95% CI around the treatment difference of clinical cure rates greater than −10%. Chinadrugtrials.org.cn registration identifier: CTR20150855.

          Results

          Clinical cure rates at TOC indicated non-inferiority of contezolid 800 mg to linezolid 600 mg q12h for patients in the FAS with clinical evaluation, FAS, and CE populations: 92.8% (271/292) versus 93.4% (284/304) (difference −0.6%, 95% CI: −4.7% to 3.5%), 81.4% (271/333) versus 84.5% (284/336) (difference −3.1%, 95% CI: −8.8% to 2.6%) and 90.5% (267/295) versus 90.1% (282/313) (difference 0.4%, 95% CI: −4.3% to 5.1%). Contezolid and linezolid showed similar efficacy for the cSSTIs caused by methicillin-susceptible or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Contezolid demonstrated significant lower incidence of leucopenia (0.3% versus 3.4%) and thrombocytopenia (0% versus 2.3%) than linezolid. The frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events was comparable between the two groups.

          Conclusions

          Contezolid 800 mg q12h is as effective as linezolid for treatment of cSSTIs in adults, but safer than linezolid in terms of haematological abnormalities.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of america for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children.

          Evidence-based guidelines for the management of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections were prepared by an Expert Panel of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). The guidelines are intended for use by health care providers who care for adult and pediatric patients with MRSA infections. The guidelines discuss the management of a variety of clinical syndromes associated with MRSA disease, including skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), bacteremia and endocarditis, pneumonia, bone and joint infections, and central nervous system (CNS) infections. Recommendations are provided regarding vancomycin dosing and monitoring, management of infections due to MRSA strains with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin, and vancomycin treatment failures.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Complicated skin and soft tissue infection.

            S Dryden (2010)
            Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are common, and complicated SSTIs (cSSTIs) are the more extreme end of this clinical spectrum, encompassing a range of clinical presentations such as deep-seated infection, a requirement for surgical intervention, the presence of systemic signs of sepsis, the presence of complicating co-morbidities, accompanying neutropenia, accompanying ischaemia, tissue necrosis, burns and bites. Staphylococcus aureus is the commonest cause of SSTI across all continents, although its epidemiology in terms of causative strains and antibiotic susceptibility can no longer be predicted with accuracy. The epidemiology of community-acquired and healthcare-acquired strains is constantly shifting and this presents challenges in the choice of empirical antibiotic therapy. Toxin production, particularly with Panton-Valentine leucocidin, may complicate the presentation still further. Polymicrobial infection with Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms and anaerobes may occur in infections approximating the rectum or genital tract and in diabetic foot infections and burns. Successful management of cSSTI involves prompt recognition, timely surgical debridement or drainage, resuscitation if required and appropriate antibiotic therapy. The mainstays of treatment are the penicillins, cephalosporins, clindamycin and co-trimoxazole. β-Lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations are indicated for polymicrobial infection. A range of new agents for the treatment of methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections have compared favourably with the glycopeptides and some have distinct pharmacokinetic advantages. These include linezolid, daptomycin and tigecycline. The latter and fluoroquinolones with enhanced anti-Gram-positive activity such as moxifloxacin are better suited for polymicrobial infection.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus therapy: past, present, and future.

              Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) continues to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Vancomycin was the "gold standard" of treatment for serious MRSA infections; however, the emergence of less-susceptible strains, poor clinical outcomes, and increased nephrotoxicity with high-dose therapy are challenging its current role as first-line therapy. Linezolid is recommended for PO or IV treatment of skin and skin structure infections (SSSIs) and pneumonia caused by MRSA. Daptomycin (IV) should be considered in patients with MRSA bacteremia and right-sided endocarditis as well as in complicated SSSIs, but should not be used to treat MRSA pneumonia. Tigecycline and telavancin are alternative (IV) treatments for SSSIs caused by MRSA; however, safety concerns have limited use of these agents. Ceftaroline is the newest of the approved parenteral agents for SSSIs caused by MRSA. Several investigational agents with activity against drug-resistant gram-positive pathogens are being developed primarily for treatment of MRSA infections, including tedizolid, dalbavancin, and oritavancin.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0305-7453
                1460-2091
                June 01 2022
                May 29 2022
                March 10 2022
                June 01 2022
                May 29 2022
                March 10 2022
                : 77
                : 6
                : 1762-1769
                Article
                10.1093/jac/dkac073
                35265985
                07c21aa5-1b55-4657-824b-396b5ee1c051
                © 2022

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article