3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance on monitoring and management of Barrett’s oesophagus and stage I oesophageal adenocarcinoma

      other

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Barrett’s oesophagus is the only known precursor to oesophageal adenocarcinoma, a cancer with very poor prognosis. The main risk factors for Barrett’s oesophagus are a history of gastro-oesophageal acid reflux symptoms and obesity. Men, smokers and those with a family history are also at increased risk. Progression from Barrett’s oesophagus to cancer occurs via an intermediate stage, known as dysplasia. However, dysplasia and early cancer usually develop without any clinical signs, often in individuals whose symptoms are well controlled by acid suppressant medications; therefore, endoscopic surveillance is recommended to allow for early diagnosis and timely clinical intervention. Individuals with Barrett’s oesophagus need to be fully informed about the implications of this diagnosis and the benefits and risks of monitoring strategies. Pharmacological treatments are recommended for control of symptoms, but not for chemoprevention. Dysplasia and stage 1 oesophageal adenocarcinoma have excellent prognoses, since they can be cured with endoscopic or surgical therapies. Endoscopic resection is the most accurate staging technique for early Barrett’s-related oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic ablation is effective and indicated to eradicate Barrett’s oesophagus in patients with dysplasia. Future research should focus on improved accuracy for dysplasia detection via new technologies and providing more robust evidence to support pathways for follow-up and treatment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references92

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett's oesophagus.

            These guidelines provide a practical and evidence-based resource for the management of patients with Barrett's oesophagus and related early neoplasia. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument was followed to provide a methodological strategy for the guideline development. A systematic review of the literature was performed for English language articles published up until December 2012 in order to address controversial issues in Barrett's oesophagus including definition, screening and diagnosis, surveillance, pathological grading for dysplasia, management of dysplasia, and early cancer including training requirements. The rigour and quality of the studies was evaluated using the SIGN checklist system. Recommendations on each topic were scored by each author using a five-tier system (A+, strong agreement, to D+, strongly disagree). Statements that failed to reach substantial agreement among authors, defined as >80% agreement (A or A+), were revisited and modified until substantial agreement (>80%) was reached. In formulating these guidelines, we took into consideration benefits and risks for the population and national health system, as well as patient perspectives. For the first time, we have suggested stratification of patients according to their estimated cancer risk based on clinical and histopathological criteria. In order to improve communication between clinicians, we recommend the use of minimum datasets for reporting endoscopic and pathological findings. We advocate endoscopic therapy for high-grade dysplasia and early cancer, which should be performed in high-volume centres. We hope that these guidelines will standardise and improve management for patients with Barrett's oesophagus and related neoplasia.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Endoscopic management of Barrett's esophagus: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement.

              Current practices for the management of Barrett's esophagus (BE) vary across Europe, as several national European guidelines exist. This Position Statement from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) is an attempt to homogenize recommendations and, hence, patient management according to the best scientific evidence and other considerations (e.g. health policy). A Working Group developed consensus statements, using the existing national guidelines as a starting point and considering new evidence in the literature. The Position Statement wishes to contribute to a more cost-effective approach to the care of patients with BE by reducing the number of surveillance endoscopies for patients with a low risk of malignant progression and centralizing care in expert centers for those with high progression rates.Main statements MS1 The diagnosis of BE is made if the distal esophagus is lined with columnar epithelium with a minimum length of 1 cm (tongues or circular) containing specialized intestinal metaplasia at histopathological examination. MS2 The ESGE recommends varying surveillance intervals for different BE lengths. For patients with an irregular Z-line/columnar-lined esophagus of < 1 cm, no routine biopsies or endoscopic surveillance is advised. For BE ≥ 1 cm and < 3 cm, BE surveillance should be repeated every 5 years. For BE ≥ 3 cm and < 10 cm, the interval for endoscopic surveillance should be 3 years. Patients with BE with a maximum extent ≥ 10 cm should be referred to a BE expert center for surveillance endoscopies. Patients with limited life expectancy and advanced age should be discharged from endoscopic surveillance. MS3 The diagnosis of any degree of dysplasia (including "indefinite for dysplasia") in BE requires confirmation by an expert gastrointestinal pathologist. MS4 Patients with visible lesions in BE diagnosed as dysplasia or early cancer should be referred to a BE expert center. All visible abnormalities, regardless of the degree of dysplasia, should be removed by means of endoscopic resection techniques in order to obtain optimal histopathological staging MS5 All patients with a BE ≥ 10 cm, a confirmed diagnosis of low grade dysplasia, high grade dysplasia (HGD), or early cancer should be referred to a BE expert center for surveillance and/or treatment. BE expert centers should meet the following criteria: annual case load of ≥10 new patients undergoing endoscopic treatment for HGD or early carcinoma per BE expert endoscopist; endoscopic and histological care provided by endoscopists and pathologists who have followed additional training; at least 30 supervised endoscopic resection and 30 endoscopic ablation procedures to acquire competence in technical skills, management pathways, and complications; multidisciplinary meetings with gastroenterologists, surgeons, oncologists, and pathologists to discuss patients with Barrett's neoplasia; access to experienced esophageal surgery; and all BE patients registered prospectively in a database.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Gut
                Gut
                gutjnl
                gut
                Gut
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                0017-5749
                1468-3288
                June 2024
                29 March 2024
                : 73
                : 6
                : 897-909
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentEarly Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology , Ringgold_2152University of Cambridge , Cambridge, UK
                [2 ] departmentDepartment of Gastroenterology , Ringgold_1731Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust , West Bromwich, UK
                [3 ] departmentInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences , University of Birmingham , Birmingham, UK
                [4 ] Ringgold_13985National Institute for Health and Care Excellence , London, UK
                [5 ] departmentDepartment of Gastroenterology , Ringgold_6698Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust , Portsmouth, UK
                [6 ] departmentDepartment of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences , Ringgold_6697University of Portsmouth , Portsmouth, UK
                [7 ] departmentDepartment of Surgery , Ringgold_5983Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
                [8 ] departmentDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery , Ringgold_111988St Thomas' Hospital , London, UK
                [9 ] departmentDepartment of Histopathology , Ringgold_9820Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust , Nottingham, UK
                [10 ] departmentDivision of Cancer and Genetics , Ringgold_2112Cardiff University , Cardiff, Cardiff, UK
                [11 ] departmentDepartment of Clinical Oncology , Ringgold_9477Velindre University NHS Trust , Cardiff, UK
                [12 ] departmentKenmore Medical Centre , Ringgold_5293Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust , Manchester, UK
                [13 ] Ringgold_8912Powys Teaching Health Board , Bronllys, UK
                [14 ] departmentDepartment of Surgery , Ringgold_105634University of Southampton , Southampton, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Massimiliano di Pietro, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; md460@ 123456cam.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4866-7026
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8040-8158
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9899-9948
                Article
                gutjnl-2023-331557
                10.1136/gutjnl-2023-331557
                11103346
                38553042
                07993a39-edcc-49a0-8e18-02ef0fd29848
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See:  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 16 November 2023
                : 15 February 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000289, Cancer Research UK;
                Award ID: CTRQQR-2021\100012
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010377, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence;
                Award ID: Not applicable
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265, Medical Research Council;
                Award ID: G111260, MR/W014122/1
                Categories
                Guideline
                1506
                2312
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                barrett's oesophagus,oesophageal cancer,proton pump inhibition,anti-reflux surgery,surveillance

                Comments

                Comment on this article