10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Analgesic efficacy of dexamethasone versus dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for post-operative pain relief in caesarean section: A prospective randomised controlled study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and Aims:

          Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is commonly used to treat post-operative pain after lower abdominal surgeries. The aim of this randomised controlled study was to assess the efficacy of addition of dexmedetomidine or dexamethasone to ropivacaine in TAP block and compare the two for post-operative pain relief in caesarean section.

          Methods:

          A hundred parturients (18–45 years) undergoing caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia received ultrasound-guided (USG) bilateral TAP block with 50ml of 3mg/kg ropivacaine along with 0.1mg/kg dexamethasone (Group A) or 1μg/kg dexmedetomidine (Group B) in this prospective, randomised, double-blind study. Time to initial self-reporting of post-operative pain, time to first rescue analgesic demand, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain haemodynamic parameters and adverse effects if any were noted, anda P value < 0.005 was considered as statistically significant.

          Results:

          Time to initial self-reporting of post-operative pain (411.35 vs. 338.20 min, P < 0.005) and time to first rescue analgesic (474.30 vs. 407.30 min, P < 0.005) were significantly longer in group B as compared to group A. VAS score at the time of initial self-reporting of pain was significantly lower in group B. No significant haemodynamic changes or side-effects were noted.

          Conclusion:

          Addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine as compared with dexamethasone in bilateral TAP block following caesarean section prolongs the time to initial post-operative pain and time to first rescue analgesic consumption.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block: description of a new technique and comparison with conventional systemic analgesia during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

          The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is usually performed by landmark-based methods. This prospective, randomized, and double-blinded study was designed to describe a method of ultrasound-guided TAP block and to evaluate the intra- and postoperative analgesic efficacy in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia with or without TAP block. Forty-two patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized to receive standard general anaesthetic either with (Group A, n=21) or without TAP block (Group B, n=21). Ultrasound-guided bilateral TAP block was performed with a high frequent linear ultrasound probe and an in-plane needle guidance technique with 15 ml bupivacaine 5 mg ml(-1) on each side. Intraoperative use of sufentanil and postoperative demand of morphine using a patient-controlled analgesia device were recorded. Ultrasonographic visualization of the relevant anatomy, detection of the shaft and tip of the needle, and the spread of local anaesthetic were possible in all cases where a TAP block was performed. Patients in Group A received significantly less [corrected] intraoperative sufentanil and postoperative morphine compared with those in Group B [mean (SD) 8.6 (3.5) vs 23.0 (4.8) microg, P<0.01, and 10.5 (7.7) vs 22.8 (4.3) mg, P<0.05]. Ultrasonographic guidance enables exact placement of the local anaesthetic for TAP blocks. In patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under standard general anaesthetic, ultrasound-guided TAP block substantially reduced the perioperative opioid consumption.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            C-fiber mechanical stimulus-response functions are different in inflammatory versus neuropathic hyperalgesia in the rat.

            To compare changes in primary afferent nociceptors associated with inflammatory versus neuropathic hyperalgesia, we evaluated in rats the mechanical stimulus-response function of isolated C-fiber primary afferent nociceptors to 10-s stimuli of differing mechanical strengths; 36 fibers after prostaglandin E2, 28 fibers from streptozotocin-diabetic rats and 46 fibers from control, non-treated rats were examined. Intradermal injection of prostaglandin E2 decreased mechanical threshold of 19 of 35 (54%) C-fibers. C-fibers that demonstrated a decrease in the mechanical threshold after prostaglandin E2 also showed an increased response to suprathreshold stimuli. The increase in the number of action potentials in prostaglandin E2-treated C-fibers was greatest at lower magnitude stimulus intensities, i.e. near threshold; the response to higher magnitude stimulus intensities was unchanged from that in control animals. In contrast, an increase in the number of action potentials seen in C-fibers from streptozotocin-diabetic rats was not seen at low-magnitude stimulus intensities; rather, a pronounced increase in response was seen at high-magnitude stimulus intensities. The von Frey hair thresholds for C-fibers in streptozotocin-diabetic rats were not different from those in control C-fibers. These data suggest that the changes in mechanical stimulus-response function of C-fibers are different in inflammatory compared to neuropathic mechanical hyperalgesia. These differences may underlie some of the differences in clinical features between inflammatory and neuropathic hyperalgesias.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to local anesthetic mixture in intercostal nerve block for thoracoscopic pneumonectomy: a prospective randomized study

              Background and objectives Perineural dexamethasone or dexmedetomidine prolongs the duration of single-injection peripheral nerve block when added to the local anesthetic solution. In a randomized, controlled, double-blinded study in patients undergoing thoracoscopic pneumonectomy, we tested the hypothesis that combined perineural dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine prolonged the duration of analgesia as compared with either perineural dexamethasone or perineural dexmedetomidine after intercostal nerve block (INB). Methods Eighty patients were randomized to receive INB using 28 mL 0.5% ropivacaine, with 2 mL normal saline (R group), with 10 mg dexamethasone in 2 mL (RS group) or 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine in 2 mL (RM group), or with 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine and 10 mg dexamethasone in 2 mL (RSM group) administrated perineurally. The INB was performed by the surgeon under thoracoscopic direct vision; a total of six intercostal spaces were involved, each with an injection of 5 mL. The primary outcome was the duration of analgesia. Secondary outcomes included total postoperative fentanyl consumption, visual analog scale pain score and safety assessment (adverse effects). Results The duration of analgesia in RSM (824.2±105.1 min) was longer than that in RS (611.5±133.0 min), RM (602.5±108.5 min) and R (440.0±109.6 min) (p<0.001). Total postoperative fentanyl consumption was lower in RSM (106.0±84.0 µg) compared with RS (243.0±175.2 µg), RM (237.0±98.7 µg) and R (369.0±134.2 µg) (p<0.001). No significant difference was observed in the incidences of adverse effects between the four groups. Conclusion The addition of combined perineural dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone to ropivacaine for INB seemed to be an attractive method for prolonged analgesia with almost no adverse effects. Trial registration number ChiCTR-IOR-17012183.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Indian J Anaesth
                Indian J Anaesth
                IJA
                Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
                Wolters Kluwer - Medknow (India )
                0019-5049
                0976-2817
                September 2021
                15 September 2021
                : 65
                : Suppl 3
                : S121-S126
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Anaesthesiology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
                [1 ]Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Dr. Kamakshi Garg, House no. 4, Professor Colony, Barewal Road, Ludhiana. Punjab - 141 012, India. E-mail: drkamakshigarg@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                IJA-65-121
                10.4103/ija.IJA_228_21
                8500199
                34703057
                0791345f-7426-4557-9bd4-a6722f48bc57
                Copyright: © 2021 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia

                This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                : 16 March 2021
                : 29 July 2021
                : 18 August 2021
                Categories
                Original Article

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                dexamethasone,dexmedetomidine,post-operative pain,transversus abdominis plane block

                Comments

                Comment on this article