3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Dietary feeding pattern does not modulate the loss of muscle mass or the decline in metabolic health during short-term bed rest

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Short periods of bed rest lead to the loss of muscle mass and quality. It has been speculated that dietary feeding pattern may have an impact upon muscle protein synthesis rates and, therefore, modulate the loss of muscle mass and quality. We subjected 20 healthy men (age: 25 ± 1 yr, body mass index: 23.8 ± 0.8 kg/m 2) to 1 wk of strict bed rest with intermittent (4 meals/day) or continuous (24 h/day) enteral tube feeding. Participants consumed deuterium oxide for 7 days before bed rest and throughout the 7-day bed rest period. Prior to and immediately after bed rest, lean body mass (dual energy X-ray absorptiometry), quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA; CT), maximal oxygen uptake capacity (V̇o 2peak), and whole body insulin sensitivity (hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp) were assessed. Muscle biopsies were collected 7 days before, 1 day before, and immediately after bed rest to assess muscle tracer incorporation. Bed rest resulted in 0.3 ± 0.3 vs. 0.7 ± 0.4 kg lean tissue loss and a 1.1 ± 0.6 vs. 0.8 ± 0.5% decline in quadriceps CSA in the intermittent vs. continuous feeding group, respectively (both P < 0.05), with no differences between groups (both P > 0.05). Moreover, feeding pattern did not modulate the bed rest-induced decline in insulin sensitivity (−46 ± 3% vs. 39 ± 3%; P < 0.001) or V̇o 2peak (−2.5 ± 2.2 vs. −8.6 ± 2.2%; P < 0.010) (both P > 0.05). Myofibrillar protein synthesis rates during bed rest did not differ between the intermittent and continuous feeding group (1.33 ± 0.07 vs. 1.50 ± 0.13%/day, respectively; P > 0.05). In conclusion, dietary feeding pattern does not modulate the loss of muscle mass or the decline in metabolic health during 1 wk of bed rest in healthy men.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Percutaneous needle biopsy of skeletal muscle in physiological and clinical research.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Timing and distribution of protein ingestion during prolonged recovery from resistance exercise alters myofibrillar protein synthesis.

            Quantity and timing of protein ingestion are major factors regulating myofibrillar protein synthesis (MPS). However, the effect of specific ingestion patterns on MPS throughout a 12 h period is unknown. We determined how different distributions of protein feeding during 12 h recovery after resistance exercise affects anabolic responses in skeletal muscle. Twenty-four healthy trained males were assigned to three groups (n = 8/group) and undertook a bout of resistance exercise followed by ingestion of 80 g of whey protein throughout 12 h recovery in one of the following protocols: 8 × 10 g every 1.5 h (PULSE); 4 × 20 g every 3 h (intermediate: INT); or 2 × 40 g every 6 h (BOLUS). Muscle biopsies were obtained at rest and after 1, 4, 6, 7 and 12 h post exercise. Resting and post-exercise MPS (l-[ring-(13)C6] phenylalanine), and muscle mRNA abundance and cell signalling were assessed. All ingestion protocols increased MPS above rest throughout 1-12 h recovery (88-148%, P INT>PULSE hierarchy in magnitude of phosphorylation. MuRF-1 and SLC38A2 mRNA were differentially expressed with BOLUS. In conclusion, 20 g of whey protein consumed every 3 h was superior to either PULSE or BOLUS feeding patterns for stimulating MPS throughout the day. This study provides novel information on the effect of modulating the distribution of protein intake on anabolic responses in skeletal muscle and has the potential to maximize outcomes of resistance training for attaining peak muscle mass.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              One week of bed rest leads to substantial muscle atrophy and induces whole-body insulin resistance in the absence of skeletal muscle lipid accumulation.

              Short (<10 days) periods of muscle disuse, often necessary for recovery from illness or injury, lead to various negative health consequences. The present study investigated mechanisms underlying disuse-induced insulin resistance, taking into account muscle atrophy. Ten healthy, young males (age: 23±1 y, BMI: 23.0±0.9 kg·m(-2)) were subjected to one week of strict bed rest. Prior to and after bed rest, lean body mass (DXA) and quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA; CT) were assessed, and VO2peak and leg strength were determined. Whole-body insulin sensitivity was measured using a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp. Additionally, muscle biopsies were collected to assess muscle lipid (fraction) content and various markers of mitochondrial and vascular content. Bed rest resulted in 1.4±0.2 kg lean tissue loss and a 3.2±0.9% decline in quadriceps CSA (both P<0.01). VO2peak and 1RM declined by 6.4±2.3 (P<0.05) and 6.9±1.4% (P<0.01), respectively. Bed rest induced a 29±5% decrease in whole-body insulin sensitivity (P<0.01). This was accompanied by a decline in muscle oxidative capacity, without alterations in skeletal muscle lipid content or saturation level, markers of oxidative stress, or capillary density. In conclusion, one week of bed rest substantially reduces skeletal muscle mass and lowers whole-body insulin sensitivity, without affecting mechanisms implicated in high-fat diet-induced insulin resistance.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
                American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
                American Physiological Society
                0193-1849
                1522-1555
                March 01 2019
                March 01 2019
                : 316
                : 3
                : E536-E545
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Human Biology, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
                Article
                10.1152/ajpendo.00378.2018
                30645176
                072c8972-96d8-4fa4-80bc-840e425f5691
                © 2019
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article