40
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      On the effects of L2 perception and of individual differences in L1 production on L2 pronunciation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The speech of late second language (L2) learners is generally marked by an accent. The dominant theoretical perspective attributes accents to deficient L2 perception arising from a transfer of L1 phonology, which is thought to influence L2 perception and production. In this study we evaluate the explanatory role of L2 perception in L2 production and explore alternative explanations arising from the L1 phonological system, such as for example, the role of L1 production. Specifically we examine the role of an individual’s L1 productions in the production of L2 vowel contrasts. Fourteen Spanish adolescents studying French at school were assessed on their perception and production of the mid-close/mid-open contrasts, /ø-œ/ and /e-ε/, which are, respectively, acoustically distinct from Spanish sounds, or similar to them. The participants’ native productions were explored to assess (1) the variability in the production of native vowels (i.e., the compactness of vowel categories in F1/F2 acoustic space), and (2) the position of the vowels in the acoustic space. The results revealed that although poorly perceived contrasts were generally produced poorly, there was no correlation between individual performance in perception and production, and no effect of L2 perception on L2 production in mixed-effects regression analyses. This result is consistent with a growing body of psycholinguistic and neuroimaging research that suggest partial dissociations between L2 perception and production. In contrast, individual differences in the compactness and position of native vowels predicted L2 production accuracy. These results point to existence of surface transfer of individual L1 phonetic realizations to L2 space and demonstrate that pre-existing features of the native space in production partly determine how new sounds can be accommodated in that space.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: a review

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Brain structure predicts the learning of foreign speech sounds.

            Previous work has shown a relationship between parietal lobe anatomy and nonnative speech sound learning. We scanned a new group of phonetic learners using structural magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging. Voxel-based morphometry indicated higher white matter (WM) density in left Heschl's gyrus (HG) in faster compared with slower learners, and manual segmentation of this structure confirmed that the WM volume of left HG is larger in the former compared with the latter group. This finding was replicated in a reanalysis of the original groups tested in Golestani and others (2002, Anatomical correlates of learning novel speech sounds. Neuron 35:997-1010). We also found that faster learners have a greater asymmetry (left > right) in parietal lobe volumes than slower learners and that the right insula and HG are more superiorly located in slower compared with faster learners. These results suggest that left auditory cortex WM anatomy, which likely reflects auditory processing efficiency, partly predicts individual differences in an aspect of language learning that relies on rapid temporal processing. It also appears that a global displacement of components of a right hemispheric language network, possibly reflecting individual differences in the functional anatomy and lateralization of language processing, is predictive of speech sound learning.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Patterns of Sounds

              Maddieson (2010)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                05 November 2014
                2014
                : 5
                : 1246
                Affiliations
                [1]Laboratory of Experimental Psycholinguistics, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva Geneva, Switzerland
                Author notes

                Edited by: Noël Nguyen, Aix-Marseille Université, France

                Reviewed by: Anna J. Simmonds, Imperial College London, UK; Shari Salzhauer Berkowitz, Mercy College, USA

                *Correspondence: Natalia Kartushina, Laboratory of Experimental Psycholinguistics, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, 40 Boulevard du Pont-d’Arve, 1204 Geneva, Switzerland e-mail: natalia.kartushina@ 123456unige.ch

                This article was submitted to Language Sciences, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology.

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01246
                4220632
                24474945
                06fba14e-f5f7-499a-ac35-e329924181bc
                Copyright © 2014 Kartushina and Frauenfelder.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 13 June 2014
                : 14 October 2014
                Page count
                Figures: 8, Tables: 4, Equations: 2, References: 74, Pages: 17, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research Article

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                l2 perception,l2 production,transfer,l1 production,variability in production,l2 phonology

                Comments

                Comment on this article