11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Tobacco smoking and the risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Several studies have found that smoking increases the risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm, however, the strength of the association has differed between studies and data from cohort studies have not yet been summarized. A systematic review and meta-analysis was therefore conducted to clarify this association. We searched PubMed and Embase databases up to May 2 nd 2018. A random effects model was used to estimate summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Twenty three prospective studies were included. Comparing current, former and ever smokers with never smokers the summary RRs were 4.87 (95% CI: 3.93–6.02, I 2 = 92%, n = 20), 2.10 (95% CI: 1.76–2.50, I 2 = 71%, n = 15) and 3.28 (95% CI: 2.60–4.15, I 2 = 96%, n = 18), respectively. The summary RR was 1.87 (95% CI: 1.45–2.40, I 2 = 97%) per 10 cigarettes per day, 1.78 (95% CI: 1.54–2.06, I 2 = 83%) per 10 pack-years was and 0.45 (95% CI: 0.32–0.63, I 2 = 92.3%) per 10 years of smoking cessation. There was evidence of nonlinearity for cigarettes per day and pack-years (p nonlinearity < 0.0001 and p nonlinearity = 0.02, respectively), but not for smoking cessation, p nonlinearity = 0.85. Among smokers who quit, the RR was similar to that of never smokers by 25 years of smoking cessation. These findings confirm a strong association between smoking and the risk of developing abdominal aortic aneurysms.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Body mass index, abdominal fatness and pancreatic cancer risk: a systematic review and non-linear dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.

          Questions remain about the shape of the dose-response relationship between body mass index (BMI) and pancreatic cancer risk, possible confounding by smoking, and differences by gender or geographic location. Whether abdominal obesity increases risk is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies of the association between BMI, abdominal fatness and pancreatic cancer risk and searched PubMed and several other databases up to January 2011. Summary relative risks (RRs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Twenty-three prospective studies of BMI and pancreatic cancer risk with 9504 cases were included. The summary RR for a 5-unit increment was 1.10 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-1.14, I(2) = 19%] and results were similar when stratified by gender and geographic location. There was evidence of a non-linear association, P(non-linearity) = 0.005; however, among nonsmokers, there was increased risk even within the 'normal' BMI range. The summary RR for a 10-cm increase in waist circumference was 1.11 (95% CI 1.05-1.18, I(2) = 0%) and for a 0.1-unit increment in waist-to-hip ratio was 1.19 (95% CI 1.09-1.31, I(2) = 11%). Both general and abdominal fatness increases pancreatic cancer risk. Among nonsmokers, risk increases even among persons within the normal BMI range.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Low prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm among 65-year-old Swedish men indicates a change in the epidemiology of the disease.

            Screening elderly men with ultrasound is an established method to reduce mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA; Evidence Level 1a). Such programs are being implemented and generally consist of a single scan at 65 years of age. We report the results from screening 65-year-old men for AAA in middle Sweden. All 65-year-old men (n=26,256), identified through the National Population Registry, were invited to an ultrasound examination. An AAA was defined as a maximum infrarenal aortic diameter of ≥30 mm. In total, 22 187 (85%) accepted, and 373 AAAs were detected (1.7%; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 1.9). With 127 previously known AAAs (repaired/under surveillance) included, the total prevalence of the disease in the population was 2.2% (95% confidence interval, 2.0 to 2.4). Self-reported smoking (odds ratio, 3.4; P<0.001), coronary artery disease (odds ratio, 2.0; P<0.001), and hypertension (odds ratio, 1.6; P=0.001) were independently associated with AAA in a multivariate logistic regression model. Thirteen percent of the entire population reported to be current smokers, one third of the frequency reported in the 1980s. The observed low prevalence of AAA was explained mainly by this change in smoking habits. On the basis of the observed reduced exposure to risk factors, lower-than-expected prevalence of AAA among 65-year-old men, unchanged AAA repair rate, and significantly improved longevity of the elderly population, the current generally agreed-on AAA screening model can be questioned. Important issues to address are the threshold diameter for follow-up, the possible need for rescreening at a higher age, and selective screening among smokers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Risk factors for asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm: systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based screening studies.

              The incidence of and mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is increasing. There is uncertainty regarding the indicators which could be used to identify groups at high risk. This issue has been addressed in a systematic review of population-based screening studies. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched, reference lists scanned and manual searches made of eight journals. The search was restricted to four languages (English, German, French and Italian). Population-based studies investigating risk factors associated with screening-detected AAA were included. The following risk factors were considered: sex, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, a history myocardial infarction, and peripheral vascular disease. Fourteen cross-sectional studies met our inclusion criteria. Most studies screened people aged 60 years or older. The prevalence of AAA ranged from 4.1% to 14.2% in men and from 0.35% to 6.2% in women. Male sex showed a strong association with AAA (OR 5.69), whereas smoking (OR 2.41), a history of myocardial infarction (OR 2.28) or peripheral vascular disease (OR 2.50) showed moderate associations. Hypertension was only weakly associated with AAA (OR 1.33) and no association was evident with diabetes (OR 1.02). The efficacy of screening men aged 60 years or older and women of the same age who smoke or have a history of peripheral or coronary artery disease should be evaluated in randomized controlled trials.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                d.aune@imperial.ac.uk
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                3 October 2018
                3 October 2018
                2018
                : 8
                : 14786
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2113 8111, GRID grid.7445.2, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, , School of Public Health, Imperial College London, ; London, United Kingdom
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0389 8485, GRID grid.55325.34, Department of Endocrinology, , Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, ; Oslo, Norway
                [3 ]Department of Nutrition, Bjørknes University College, Oslo, Norway
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2176 9917, GRID grid.411327.2, Institute for Biometry and Epidemiology, German Diabetes Center, , Leibniz Institute for Diabetes Research at the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, ; Düsseldorf, Germany
                Article
                32100
                10.1038/s41598-018-32100-2
                6170425
                30283044
                069ee312-acdc-4961-ac71-669bd5d1648c
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 31 August 2017
                : 23 August 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: The Imperial College National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC).
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article