35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Active and passive stabilization of body pitch in insect flight

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Flying insects have evolved sophisticated sensory–motor systems, and here we argue that such systems are used to keep upright against intrinsic flight instabilities. We describe a theory that predicts the instability growth rate in body pitch from flapping-wing aerodynamics and reveals two ways of achieving balanced flight: active control with sufficiently rapid reactions and passive stabilization with high body drag. By glueing magnets to fruit flies and perturbing their flight using magnetic impulses, we show that these insects employ active control that is indeed fast relative to the instability. Moreover, we find that fruit flies with their control sensors disabled can keep upright if high-drag fibres are also attached to their bodies, an observation consistent with our prediction for the passive stability condition. Finally, we extend this framework to unify the control strategies used by hovering animals and also furnish criteria for achieving pitch stability in flapping-wing robots.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight.

          The enhanced aerodynamic performance of insects results from an interaction of three distinct yet interactive mechanisms: delayed stall, rotational circulation, and wake capture. Delayed stall functions during the translational portions of the stroke, when the wings sweep through the air with a large angle of attack. In contrast, rotational circulation and wake capture generate aerodynamic forces during stroke reversals, when the wings rapidly rotate and change direction. In addition to contributing to the lift required to keep an insect aloft, these two rotational mechanisms provide a potent means by which the animal can modulate the direction and magnitude of flight forces during steering maneuvers. A comprehensive theory incorporating both translational and rotational mechanisms may explain the diverse patterns of wing motion displayed by different species of insects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The aerodynamics of free-flight maneuvers in Drosophila.

            Using three-dimensional infrared high-speed video, we captured the wing and body kinematics of free-flying fruit flies as they performed rapid flight maneuvers. We then "replayed" the wing kinematics on a dynamically scaled robotic model to measure the aerodynamic forces produced by the wings. The results show that a fly generates rapid turns with surprisingly subtle modifications in wing motion, which nonetheless generate sufficient torque for the fly to rotate its body through each turn. The magnitude and time course of the torque and body motion during rapid turns indicate that inertia, not friction, dominates the flight dynamics of insects.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The First Takeoff of a Biologically Inspired At-Scale Robotic Insect

              R.J. Wood (2008)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J R Soc Interface
                J R Soc Interface
                RSIF
                royinterface
                Journal of the Royal Society Interface
                The Royal Society
                1742-5689
                1742-5662
                6 August 2013
                6 August 2013
                : 10
                : 85
                : 20130237
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Physics, Cornell University , Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
                [2 ]School of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University , Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
                [3 ]Department of Mathematics, Cornell University , Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
                [4 ]School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University , Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
                [5 ]IJK Controls , Dallas, TX 75231, USA
                [6 ]Department of Engineering, Brown University , Providence, RI 02912, USA
                Author notes
                Article
                rsif20130237
                10.1098/rsif.2013.0237
                4043156
                23697713
                06552c57-b7b3-4152-a29f-f161fe3cba76

                © 2013 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 13 March 2013
                : 29 April 2013
                Categories
                1004
                25
                29
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                August 6, 2013

                Life sciences
                insect flight,flapping flight,stability,control,fruit fly,flight dynamics
                Life sciences
                insect flight, flapping flight, stability, control, fruit fly, flight dynamics

                Comments

                Comment on this article