0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The risk of candidiasis during treatment with bimekizumab for the management of plaque psoriasis: a 16-week multicentre real-world experience – IL PSO (Italian Landscape Psoriasis)

      Clinical and Experimental Dermatology
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Anti-interleukin 17 use has been associated with a higher risk of candidiasis, as this cytokine is involved in maintaining mucosal barriers and orchestrating immune responses to fungal pathogens. We performed a real-life retrospective multicentre study aiming to assess the risk of candidiasis in patients undergoing treatment with bimekizumab at labelled dosage for psoriasis, for at least 16 weeks.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Bimekizumab versus Secukinumab in Plaque Psoriasis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Effectiveness and safety of bimekizumab for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: a real-life multicenter study—IL PSO (Italian landscape psoriasis)

            Introduction Bimekizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets Interleukin-17 A and F, approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. While bimekizumab has been evaluated in several phase-III clinical trials, real-world evidence is still very limited. Method This multicenter retrospective study included patients affected by plaque psoriasis treated with bimekizumab from May 1, 2022 to April 30, 2023, at 19 Italian referral hospitals. Patients affected by moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis eligible for systemic treatments were included. The effectiveness of bimekizumab was evaluated in terms of reduction in psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) compared with baseline at weeks 4 and 16. The main outcomes were the percentages of patients achieving an improvement of at least 75% (PASI75), 90% (PASI90) and 100% (PASI100) in PASI score. Results The study included 237 patients who received at least one injection of bimekizumab. One hundred and seventy-one patients and 114 reached four and 16 weeks of follow-up, respectively. Complete skin clearance was achieved by 43.3% and 75.4% of patients at weeks 4 and 16, respectively. At week 16, 86.8% of patients reported no impact on their quality of life. At week 16, there were no significant differences between bio-naïve and bio-experienced patients in terms of PASI75, PASI90 and PASI100. The most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) were oral candidiasis (10.1%). No severe AEs or AEs leading to discontinuation were observed throughout the study. Conclusion Our experience supports the effectiveness and tolerability of bimekizumab in a real-world setting with similar results compared with phase-III clinical trials.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Bimekizumab treatment in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a drug safety evaluation

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clinical and Experimental Dermatology
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0307-6938
                1365-2230
                October 07 2024
                October 07 2024
                Article
                10.1093/ced/llae400
                0630dab2-2c5b-4958-b998-fd5fa2b04e66
                © 2024

                https://academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article