55
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Erlotinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Stage IIIA (N2) EGFR Mutation‐Positive Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective, Single‐Arm, Phase II Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Lessons Learned.

          • The findings of this prospective, single‐arm, phase II study showed that neoadjuvant erlotinib was well tolerated and might improve the radical resection rate in patients with stage IIIA‐N2 epidermal growth factor receptor mutation‐positive non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

          • Erlotinib shows promise as a neoadjuvant therapy option in this patient population.

          • Next‐generation sequencing may be useful for predicting outcomes with preoperative tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with NSCLC.

          • Large‐scale randomized controlled trials investigating the role of TKIs in perioperative therapy, combining neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments to enhance personalized therapy for patients in this precision medicine era, are warranted.

          Background.

          Information on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as neoadjuvant therapy in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is scarce. We evaluated whether neoadjuvant erlotinib improves operability and survival in patients with stage IIIA‐N2 EGFR mutation‐positive NSCLC.

          Methods.

          We conducted a prospective, single‐arm, phase II study. Patients received erlotinib 150 mg per day for 56 days in the neoadjuvant period. The primary endpoint was the radical resection rate.

          Results.

          Nineteen patients were included in the final analysis. After erlotinib treatment, 14 patients underwent surgery. The radical resection rate was 68.4% (13/19) with a 21.1% (4/19) rate of pathological downstaging. The objective response rate was 42.1%; 89.5% (17/19) of patients achieved disease control, with a 10.3‐month median disease‐free survival among patients who underwent surgery. Among all 19 patients who received neoadjuvant therapy, median progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 11.2 and 51.6 months, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 36.8% (7/19) of patients, with the most common AE being rash (26.3%); 15.8% experienced grade 3/4 AEs. Quality of life (QoL) improvements were observed after treatment with erlotinib for almost all QoL assessments. Effects of TP53 mutation on prognosis were evaluated in eight patients with adequate tissue samples. Next‐generation sequencing revealed that most patients had a TP53 gene mutation (7/8) in addition to an EGFR mutation. No TP53 mutation, or very low abundance, was associated with longer PFS (36 and 38 months, respectively), whereas high abundance was associated with short PFS (8 months).

          Conclusion.

          Neoadjuvant erlotinib was well tolerated and may improve the radical resection rate in this patient population. Next‐generation sequencing may predict outcomes with preoperative TKIs.

          Translated abstract

          经验获取

          • 本次前瞻性单组 II 期研究结果显示,埃罗替尼新辅助治疗在 IIIA‐N2 期表皮生长因子受体突变阳性非小细胞肺癌 (NSCLC) 患者中的耐受性良好,可以提高根治性切除率。

          • 在此患者群体中,埃罗替尼显示出了作为新辅助治疗选择的希望。

          • 对于预测 NSCLC 患者的手术前酪氨酸激酶抑制剂 (TKI) 结果而言,下一代测序可能十分有用。

          • 为了在这个精准医疗的时代提高患者的个性化治疗水平,开展旨在调查 TKI 在围术期治疗(新辅助治疗与辅助治疗相结合)中作用的大规模随机对照试验很有必要。

          摘要

          背景。 关于表皮生长因子受体 (EGFR) 酪氨酸激酶抑制剂 (TKI) 作为非小细胞肺癌 (NSCLC) 的新辅助治疗的信息十分匮乏。我们对埃罗替尼新辅助治疗能否改进 IIIA‐N2 期 EGFR 突变阳性 NSCLC 患者的可手术性和生存期进行了评估。

          方法。 我们进行了一项前瞻性单组 II 期研究。在新辅助治疗期间,患者每天服用埃罗替尼 150 mg,连续给药 56 天。主要终点是根治性切除率。

          结果。 最终分析中包含 19 名患者。在埃罗替尼治疗之后,14 名患者接受手术。根治性切除率为 68.4% (13/19),病理性降级率为 21.1% (4/19)。客观反应率为 42.1%;89.5% (17/19) 的患者病情得到控制,在接受手术的患者中,中位无病生存期为 10.3 个月。在所有接受新辅助治疗的 19 名患者中,中位无进展生存期 (PFS) 和总体生存期分别为 11.2 个月和 51.6 个月。36.8% (7/19) 的患者出现不良反应 (AE),最常见的 AE 为皮疹 (26.3%);15.8% 的患者出现 3/4 级 AE。对于几乎所有的生存质量 (QoL) 评估,在治疗后均观察到了 QoL 改善。我们针对 8 名具有适当组织样本的患者评估了 TP53 突变对预后的影响。下一代测序显示,除 EGFR 突变之外,大多数患者均有 TP53 基因突变 (7/8)。无 TP53 突变或极低丰度与较长的 PFS(分别为 36 个月和 38 个月)相关,而高丰度与短 PFS(8 个月)相关。

          结论。 埃罗替尼新辅助治疗在此患者群体中的耐受性良好,可以提高根治性切除率。下一代测序可以预测手术前 TKI 的结果。

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The impact of EGFR T790M mutations and BIM mRNA expression on outcome in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with erlotinib or chemotherapy in the randomized phase III EURTAC trial.

          Concomitant genetic alterations could account for transient clinical responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors of the EGF receptor (EGFR) in patients harboring activating EGFR mutations. We have evaluated the impact of pretreatment somatic EGFR T790M mutations, TP53 mutations, and Bcl-2 interacting mediator of cell death (BCL2L11, also known as BIM) mRNA expression in 95 patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) included in the EURTAC trial (trial registration: NCT00446225). T790M mutations were detected in 65.26% of patients using our highly sensitive method based on laser microdissection and peptide-nucleic acid-clamping PCR, which can detect the mutation at an allelic dilution of 1 in 5,000. Progression-free survival (PFS) to erlotinib was 9.7 months for those with T790M mutations and 15.8 months for those without, whereas among patients receiving chemotherapy, it was 6 and 5.1 months, respectively (P < 0.0001). PFS to erlotinib was 12.9 months for those with high and 7.2 months for those with low/intermediate BCL2L11 expression levels, whereas among chemotherapy-treated patients, it was 5.8 and 5.5 months, respectively (P = 0.0003). Overall survival was 28.6 months for patients with high BCL2L11 expression and 22.1 months for those with low/intermediate BCL2L11 expression (P = 0.0364). Multivariate analyses showed that erlotinib was a marker of longer PFS (HR = 0.35; P = 0.0003), whereas high BCL2L11 expression was a marker of longer PFS (HR = 0.49; P = 0.0122) and overall survival (HR = 0.53; P = 0.0323). Low-level pretreatment T790M mutations can frequently be detected and can be used for customizing treatment with T790M-specific inhibitors. BCL2L11 mRNA expression is a biomarker of survival in EGFR-mutant NSCLC and can potentially be used for synthetic lethality therapies. ©2014 AACR.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Quality of life (QoL) analyses from OPTIMAL (CTONG-0802), a phase III, randomised, open-label study of first-line erlotinib versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

            The OPTIMAL study found that erlotinib improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus standard chemotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This report describes the quality of life (QoL) and updated PFS analyses from this study. Chinese patients ≥ 18 years with histologically confirmed stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and a confirmed activating mutation of EGFR (exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R point mutation) received erlotinib (150 mg/day; n = 82) or gemcitabine-carboplatin (n = 72). The primary efficacy end point was PFS; QoL was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire, Trial Outcome Index (TOI) and Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS). Patients receiving erlotinib experienced clinically relevant improvements in QoL compared with the chemotherapy group in total FACT-L, TOI and LCS (P < 0.0001 for all scales). Erlotinib scored better than chemotherapy for all FACT-L subscales from baseline to cycles 2 and 4 (non-significant). In the updated analysis, PFS was significantly longer for erlotinib than chemotherapy (median PFS 13.7 versus 4.6 months; HR = 0.164, 95% CI = 0.105-0.256; P < 0.0001), which was similar to the previously reported primary analysis. Erlotinib improves QoL compared with standard chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Phase II study of biomarker-guided neoadjuvant treatment strategy for IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer based on epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status

              Background Neoadjuvant erlotinib and customized adjuvant therapy are appealing but controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of biomarker-guided neoadjuvant treatment strategy in patients with IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stratified by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status. Findings Patients with resectable histologically documented stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC were assigned to a neoadjuvant erlotinib arm or a gemcitabine/carboplatin (GC) arm based on EGFR mutation status. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Twenty-four patients with IIIA-N2 NSCLC were enrolled in the trial from January 2008 until May 2011. The overall response rate was 41.7 % and the PFS and OS were 7.9 and 23.2 months, respectively, in overall population. The RR was 58.3 % (7/12) for the erlotinib arm with mutant EGFR and 25.0 % (3/12) for the GC arm with wild type EGFR (P = 0.18). Median PFS was 6.9 months versus 9.0 months, respectively (P = 0.071). Median OS was 14.5 months for the erlotinib arm and 28.1 months for the GC arm (P = 0.201). No unexpected toxicities were observed. Conclusions The primary endpoint was met and biomarker-guided neoadjuvant treatment strategy in patients with IIIA-N2 NSCLC is feasible. Erlotinib alone in neoadjuvant setting of EGFR mutant population showed an improved response but without survival benefits. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00600587 https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00600587?term=NCT00600587&rank=1 Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13045-015-0151-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                xkyyhanbh@outlook.com
                Journal
                Oncologist
                Oncologist
                10.1002/(ISSN)1549-490X
                The Oncologist
                oncologist
                theoncologist
                The Oncologist
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                1083-7159
                1549-490X
                29 August 2018
                February 2019
                29 August 2018
                : 24
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1002/onco.v24.2 )
                : 157-e64
                Affiliations
                [ a ] Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University , Shanghai, China
                [ b ] Department of Thoracic Sugery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University , Shanghai, China
                [ c ] Department of Pathology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University , Shanghai, China
                [ d ] Best Biotech Ltd, Dalian, Liaoning , China
                [ e ] Burning Rock Biotech , Guangzhou, China
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Correspondence: Baohui Han, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, 241 West Huaihai Rd., Shanghai 200030, China. Telephone: 862122203993; e‐mail: xkyyhanbh@ 123456outlook.com
                Article
                ONCO12672
                10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0120
                6369937
                30158288
                0516544f-5c5b-4b5c-87a2-51c3cf4fca44
                © AlphaMed Press; the data published online to support this summary are the property of the authors
                History
                : 28 February 2018
                : 10 July 2018
                Page count
                Pages: 14
                Categories
                4
                14
                31
                Clinical Trial Results

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                Oncology & Radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article