11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Decision-related activity in sensory neurons reflects more than a neuron’s causal effect

      research-article
      1 , 1
      Nature

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          During perceptual decisions, the activity of sensory neurons correlates with a subject’s percept, even when the physical stimulus is identical 19. The origin of this correlation is unknown. Current theory proposes a causal effect of noise in sensory neurons on perceptual decisions 1012, but it could result from different brain-states associated with the perceptual choice 13 (top-down). These two schemes have very different implications for the role played by sensory neurons in forming decisions 14. Here, we used white-noise analysis 15 to measure tuning-functions of V2 neurons associated with choice and simultaneously measure how the variation in the stimulus affects subjects’ (two macaques) perceptual decisions 1618. In causal models stronger effects of the stimulus upon decisions, mediated by sensory neurons, are associated with stronger choice-related activity. However, we find that over the timecourse of the trial, these measures change in different directions—at odds with causal models. An analysis of effect of reward size supports the same conclusion. Finally, choice was associated with changes in neuronal gain that are incompatible with causal models. All three results are readily explained if choice is associated with changes in neuronal gain caused by top-down phenomena that closely resemble attention 19. We conclude that top-down processes contribute to choice-related activity. Thus even forming simple sensory decisions involves complex interactions between cognitive processes and sensory neurons.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dynamics of ongoing activity: explanation of the large variability in evoked cortical responses.

          Evoked activity in the mammalian cortex and the resulting behavioral responses exhibit a large variability to repeated presentations of the same stimulus. This study examined whether the variability can be attributed to ongoing activity. Ongoing and evoked spatiotemporal activity patterns in the cat visual cortex were measured with real-time optical imaging; local field potentials and discharges of single neurons were recorded simultaneously, by electrophysiological techniques. The evoked activity appeared deterministic, and the variability resulted from the dynamics of ongoing activity, presumably reflecting the instantaneous state of cortical networks. In spite of the large variability, evoked responses in single trials could be predicted by linear summation of the deterministic response and the preceding ongoing activity. Ongoing activity must play an important role in cortical function and cannot be ignored in exploration of cognitive processes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex.

            Changes in neural responses based on spatial attention have been demonstrated in many areas of visual cortex, indicating that the neural correlate of attention is an enhanced response to stimuli at an attended location and reduced responses to stimuli elsewhere. Here we demonstrate non-spatial, feature-based attentional modulation of visual motion processing, and show that attention increases the gain of direction-selective neurons in visual cortical area MT without narrowing the direction-tuning curves. These findings place important constraints on the neural mechanisms of attention and we propose to unify the effects of spatial location, direction of motion and other features of the attended stimuli in a 'feature similarity gain model' of attention.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Brain states: top-down influences in sensory processing.

              All cortical and thalamic levels of sensory processing are subject to powerful top-down influences, the shaping of lower-level processes by more complex information. New findings on the diversity of top-down interactions show that cortical areas function as adaptive processors, being subject to attention, expectation, and perceptual task. Brain states are determined by the interactions between multiple cortical areas and the modulation of intrinsic circuits by feedback connections. In perceptual learning, both the encoding and recall of learned information involves a selection of the appropriate inputs that convey information about the stimulus being discriminated. Disruption of this interaction may lead to behavioral disorders, including schizophrenia.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0410462
                6011
                Nature
                Nature
                0028-0836
                1476-4687
                16 July 2010
                8 March 2009
                7 May 2009
                9 August 2010
                : 459
                : 7243
                : 89-92
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Laboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, 49 Convent Dr, Bethesda MD, 20892
                Author notes
                Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to H.N. ( hnienb@ 123456gmail.com )
                Article
                nihpa102694
                10.1038/nature07821
                2917918
                19270683
                04045f50-8b93-479c-bb3b-918d81721758
                History
                Funding
                Funded by: National Eye Institute : NEI
                Award ID: ZIA EY000404-08 ||EY
                Funded by: National Eye Institute : NEI
                Award ID: Z99 EY999999 ||EY
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article