1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Instrumental reflectance values of fresh pork are dependant on aperture size.

      1 ,
      Meat science
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The effect of aperture size on instrumental pork color measurements was studied. Pork longissimus chops (n=30) were cut, aerobically packaged, and allowed to bloom overnight. Chops were measured once with each of four aperture ports (4.45, 2.54, 1.27, and 0.64cm diameter) on a HunterLab LabScan. Reflectance values measured with smaller aperture sizes were reduced (P<0.05) for most visual wavelengths (10nm intervals), and the percent reduction was greatest in the range of the longer, redder wavelengths. Values for L(∗), a(∗), b(∗), and saturation index were reduced (P<0.05) with decreasing aperture size under illuminants A, C, and D(65). Using illuminant A, hue angle increased (P<0.05) as aperture size decreased. For illuminants C and D(65), hue angles were similar (P>0.05) for the three largest aperture sizes, but negative a(∗) values found with the smallest aperture size skewed the hue angle data.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Meat Sci
          Meat science
          Elsevier BV
          0309-1740
          0309-1740
          Aug 2008
          : 79
          : 4
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
          Article
          S0309-1740(07)00377-4
          10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.11.006
          22063037
          03cfa165-36d3-497e-8565-e7a2146d6fd7
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article