13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of familiarity with the format of the exam on performance in the OSCE of undergraduate medical students – an interventional study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Assessments, such as summative structured examinations, aim to verify whether students have acquired the necessary competencies. It is important to familiarize students with the examination format prior to the assessment to ensure that true competency is measured. However, it is unclear whether students can demonstrate their true potential or possibly perform less effectively due to the unfamiliar examination format. Hence, we questioned whether a 10-min active familiarization in the form of simulation improved medical students´ OSCE performance. Next, we wanted to elucidate whether the effect depends on whether the familiarization procedure is active or passive.

          Methods

          We implemented an intervention consisting of a 10-min active simulation to prepare the students for the OSCE setting. We compared the impact of this intervention on performance to no intervention in 5th-year medical students ( n = 1284) from 2018 until 2022. Recently, a passive lecture, in which the OSCE setting is explained without active participation of the students, was introduced as a comparator group. Students who participated in neither the intervention nor the passive lecture group formed the control group. The OSCE performance between the groups and the impact of gender was assessed using X 2, nonparametric tests and regression analysis (total n = 362).

          Results

          We found that active familiarization of students ( n = 188) yields significantly better performance compared to the passive comparator (Cohen´s d = 0.857, p < 0.001, n = 52) and control group (Cohen´s d = 0.473, p < 0.001, n = 122). In multivariate regression analysis, active intervention remained the only significant variable with a 2.945-fold increase in the probability of passing the exam ( p = 0.018).

          Conclusions

          A short 10-min active intervention to familiarize students with the OSCE setting significantly improved student performance. We suggest that curricula should include simulations on the exam setting in addition to courses that increase knowledge or skills to mitigate the negative effect of nonfamiliarity with the OSCE exam setting on the students.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-024-05091-0.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.

          To test the hypothesis that lecturing maximizes learning and course performance, we metaanalyzed 225 studies that reported data on examination scores or failure rates when comparing student performance in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses under traditional lecturing versus active learning. The effect sizes indicate that on average, student performance on examinations and concept inventories increased by 0.47 SDs under active learning (n = 158 studies), and that the odds ratio for failing was 1.95 under traditional lecturing (n = 67 studies). These results indicate that average examination scores improved by about 6% in active learning sections, and that students in classes with traditional lecturing were 1.5 times more likely to fail than were students in classes with active learning. Heterogeneity analyses indicated that both results hold across the STEM disciplines, that active learning increases scores on concept inventories more than on course examinations, and that active learning appears effective across all class sizes--although the greatest effects are in small (n ≤ 50) classes. Trim and fill analyses and fail-safe n calculations suggest that the results are not due to publication bias. The results also appear robust to variation in the methodological rigor of the included studies, based on the quality of controls over student quality and instructor identity. This is the largest and most comprehensive metaanalysis of undergraduate STEM education published to date. The results raise questions about the continued use of traditional lecturing as a control in research studies, and support active learning as the preferred, empirically validated teaching practice in regular classrooms.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Competency-based medical education: theory to practice.

            Although competency-based medical education (CBME) has attracted renewed interest in recent years among educators and policy-makers in the health care professions, there is little agreement on many aspects of this paradigm. We convened a unique partnership - the International CBME Collaborators - to examine conceptual issues and current debates in CBME. We engaged in a multi-stage group process and held a consensus conference with the aim of reviewing the scholarly literature of competency-based medical education, identifying controversies in need of clarification, proposing definitions and concepts that could be useful to educators across many jurisdictions, and exploring future directions for this approach to preparing health professionals. In this paper, we describe the evolution of CBME from the outcomes movement in the 20th century to a renewed approach that, focused on accountability and curricular outcomes and organized around competencies, promotes greater learner-centredness and de-emphasizes time-based curricular design. In this paradigm, competence and related terms are redefined to emphasize their multi-dimensional, dynamic, developmental, and contextual nature. CBME therefore has significant implications for the planning of medical curricula and will have an important impact in reshaping the enterprise of medical education. We elaborate on this emerging CBME approach and its related concepts, and invite medical educators everywhere to enter into further dialogue about the promise and the potential perils of competency-based medical curricula for the 21st century.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom

              Significance Despite active learning being recognized as a superior method of instruction in the classroom, a major recent survey found that most college STEM instructors still choose traditional teaching methods. This article addresses the long-standing question of why students and faculty remain resistant to active learning. Comparing passive lectures with active learning using a randomized experimental approach and identical course materials, we find that students in the active classroom learn more, but they feel like they learn less. We show that this negative correlation is caused in part by the increased cognitive effort required during active learning. Faculty who adopt active learning are encouraged to intervene and address this misperception, and we describe a successful example of such an intervention.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Hannes.Neuwirt@i-med.ac.at
                Journal
                BMC Med Educ
                BMC Med Educ
                BMC Medical Education
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6920
                23 February 2024
                23 February 2024
                2024
                : 24
                : 179
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.5361.1, ISNI 0000 0000 8853 2677, Department of Internal Medicine IV – Nephrology and Hypertension, , Medical University of Innsbruck, ; Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
                [2 ]GRID grid.5361.1, ISNI 0000 0000 8853 2677, Department of Urology, , Medical University of Innsbruck, ; Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
                [3 ]GRID grid.5361.1, ISNI 0000 0000 8853 2677, Department of Internal Medicine V – Hematology and Oncology, , Medical University of Innsbruck, ; Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
                [4 ]GRID grid.5361.1, ISNI 0000 0000 8853 2677, Department of Internal Medicine III – Cardiology and Angiology, , Medical University of Innsbruck, ; Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
                [5 ]GRID grid.5361.1, ISNI 0000 0000 8853 2677, Department of Internal Medicine I – Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, , Medical University of Innsbruck, ; Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
                [6 ]GRID grid.5361.1, ISNI 0000 0000 8853 2677, Department of Internal Medicine II, , Medical University of Innsbruck, ; Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
                [7 ]GRID grid.5361.1, ISNI 0000 0000 8853 2677, Vice Rectorate for Teaching and Study Affairs, , Medical University of Innsbruck, ; Fritz-Pregl-Strasse 3, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
                [8 ]Institute for Medical Education (IML) - Assessment and Evaluation Unit (AAE), University of Bern, ( https://ror.org/02k7v4d05) Mittelstrasse 43, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
                Article
                5091
                10.1186/s12909-024-05091-0
                10893607
                38395807
                03becee9-fb56-4c7a-b75d-a206cd0352b8
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 23 August 2023
                : 24 January 2024
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024

                Education
                osce,familiarization,elective course,performance,medical students,active participation,passive lecture

                Comments

                Comment on this article