25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ocular Trauma: An Overview

      editorial
      1 , *
      Archives of Trauma Research
      Kowsar
      WHO, Blindness

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Blindness, especially when bilateral, is a serious public health problem that affects a person's quality of life and imposes major socioeconomic and psychological impacts on patients and their relatives. The number of blind peoples increases to 76 million in year 2020 if no active preventive measure is installed. Incidence of blindness varies in different communities ranging from 0.2-1.0 percent by WHO sub region (1). The most common cause of unilateral blindness in pediatric age groups, especially in developing countries, is ocular trauma. It is simply preventable by the supervision of the parents and baby caregivers (2). The epidemiology of eye injuries varies in different parts of the world and different age groups and depends on many factors including life style, socioeconomic status, traffic state, sport and creative activities and type of registration and recording of data (3). About half a million people in the world are blind as a result of eye injuries. About 30-40% of monocular blindness is due to ocular trauma (2, 3). Ocular injuries, even minor types, may result in significant economic burdens to families and countries due to time lost from work, or school and family care giving, expensive hospitalization, specialist visit and treatment, prolonged follow-up and visual rehabilitation (4). Estimation of direct and indirect costs of ocular trauma is difficult because it needs accurate data which is not accessible without definite strategies and planning. In many descriptive studies in the world, the major risk factors and epidemiologic features are age, gender, socioeconomic status and life styles. Review of literature from 1992–2013 showed no significant changes in pattern, etiology and location of occurrence of eye injuries (5-10). High rates of eye trauma occur in young males (age 18-25 years), and this is related to work, sport, assaults and traffic (2-4). Less common causes of eye injuries are BB gun shot which usually leads to severe visual impairment despite modern surgical techniques (2, 4), war- related ocular injuries (8) and fireworks in children (6). Contact lens- induced keratitis and decreased vision is increasing due to wide–spread use of contact lenses (7). About 38-52% of all cases presenting to ophthalmic emergency rooms are ocular trauma and 0.9-1.8% of them need to be admitted due to severe trauma (4). Although most cases of traumatic eye injuries are preventable, current preventable strategies for them need more effective implementation. Today, preventive measures and protective eye wears have reached to work places, sport and leisure facilities; however, they are neither readily available for use, nor comfortable during related activities. It is hopefully supposed that training about hazards associated with specific activities, facilitating the availability of eye wears, accident prevention and training baby care givers for prevention of children trauma may prevent or decrease mortality and morbidity of ocular injuries. A standardized international design for recording of eye injuries seems to be mandatory to permit accurate planning for the prevention and management of this disastrous incident.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002.

          This paper presents estimates of the prevalence of visual impairment and its causes in 2002, based on the best available evidence derived from recent studies. Estimates were determined from data on low vision and blindness as defined in the International statistical classification of diseases, injuries and causes of death, 10th revision. The number of people with visual impairment worldwide in 2002 was in excess of 161 million, of whom about 37 million were blind. The burden of visual impairment is not distributed uniformly throughout the world: the least developed regions carry the largest share. Visual impairment is also unequally distributed across age groups, being largely confined to adults 50 years of age and older. A distribution imbalance is also found with regard to gender throughout the world: females have a significantly higher risk of having visual impairment than males. Notwithstanding the progress in surgical intervention that has been made in many countries over the last few decades, cataract remains the leading cause of visual impairment in all regions of the world, except in the most developed countries. Other major causes of visual impairment are, in order of importance, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy and trachoma.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Epidemiological patterns of ocular trauma.

            Ocular trauma is the cause of blindness in approximately half a million people worldwide, and many more have suffered partial loss of sight. Trauma is often the most important cause of unilateral loss of vision, particularly in developing countries. There is a cumulative risk of ocular trauma and visual loss during life, but the true incidence of accidents involving the eyes is not known. Males tend to have more eye trauma than females, and this is already apparent from childhood; lower socioeconomic classes are also more associated with ocular trauma. The setting for the occurrence of trauma is most commonly the workplace and, increasingly, road accidents. On the other hand, domestic accidents are probably under-reported. Of particular importance in some developing countries is the occurrence of superficial corneal trauma in agricultural work, often leading to rapidly progressing corneal ulceration and visual loss. The impact of ocular trauma, in terms of need for medical care, loss of income and cost of rehabilitation services when indicated, clearly makes the strengthening of preventive measures very worthwhile.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Combat ocular trauma visual outcomes during operations iraqi and enduring freedom.

              To report the visual and anatomic outcomes as well as to predict the visual prognosis of combat ocular trauma (COT) during Operations Iraqi and Enduring Freedom. Retrospective, noncomparative, interventional, consecutive case series. Five hundred twenty-three consecutive globe or adnexal combat injuries, or both, sustained by 387 United States soldiers treated at Walter Reed Army Medical Center between March 2003 and October 2006. Two hundred one ocular trauma variables were collected on each injured soldier. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was categorized using the ocular trauma score (OTS) grading system and was analyzed by comparing initial and 6-month postinjury BCVA. Best-corrected visual acuity, OTS, and globe, oculoplastic, neuro-ophthalmic, and associated nonocular injuries. The median age was 25+/-7 years (range, 18-57 years), with the median baseline OTS of 70+/-25 (range, 12-100). The types of COT included closed-globe (n = 234; zone 1+2, n = 103; zone 3, n = 131), open-globe (n = 198; intraocular foreign body, n = 86; perforating, n = 61; penetrating, n = 32; and rupture, n = 19), oculoplastic (n = 324), and neuro-ophthalmic (n = 135) injuries. Globe trauma was present in 432 eyes, with 253 eyes used for visual acuity analysis. Comparing initial versus 6-month BCVA, 42% of eyes achieved a BCVA of 20/40 or better, whereas 32% of eyes had a BCVA of no light perception. Closed-globe injuries accounted for 65% of BCVA of 20/40 or better, whereas 75% of open-globe injuries had a BCVA of 20/200 or worse. The ocular injuries with the worst visual outcomes included choroidal hemorrhage, globe perforation or rupture, retinal detachment, submacular hemorrhage, and traumatic optic neuropathy. Additionally, COT that combined globe injury with oculoplastic or neuro-ophthalmologic injury resulted in the highest risk of final BCVA worse than 20/200 (odds ratio, 11.8; 95% confidence interval, 4.0-34.7; P<0.0005). Nonocular injuries occurred in 85% of cases and included traumatic brain injury (66%) and facial injury (58%). Extremity injuries were 44% (170 of 387 soldiers). Amputation is a subset of extremity injury with 12% (46 of 387) having sustained a severe extremity injury causing amputation. Combat ocular trauma has high rates of nonocular injuries with better visual outcomes in closed-globe compared with open-globe trauma. The OTS is a valid classification scheme for COT and correlates the severity of injury with the final visual acuity and prognosis. Globe combined with oculoplastic or neuroophthalmologic injuries have the worst visual prognosis. The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Arch Trauma Res
                Arch Trauma Res
                10.5812/atr
                Kowsar
                Archives of Trauma Research
                Kowsar
                2251-953X
                2251-9599
                29 June 2014
                June 2014
                : 3
                : 2
                : e21639
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Trauma Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, IR Iran
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author: Dawood Aghadoost, Trauma Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, IR Iran. Tel: +98-3615342020; +98-9131613628, Fax: +98-36153389, E-mail: dawood_aghadoost@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                10.5812/atr.21639
                4139697
                25147781
                039f5056-3504-4e2a-9708-bc21c97a6e5c
                Copyright © 2014, Kashan University of Medical Sciences; Published by Kowsar Corp.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 25 June 2014
                : 25 June 2014
                Categories
                Editorial

                who,blindness
                who, blindness

                Comments

                Comment on this article